| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Connie FournierMember
Joined: 06 Jan 2001 Total posts: 22169 Location: Kingston, Ontario Age: 44 Gender: Female
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 12:12 pm Post subject: CHRC taking submissions on issue of closed hearing! WRITE! |
|
|
CHRC taking submissions on issue of closed hearing! WRITE!
The CHRC has said that they will take submissions from the public on the issue of the closed Warman v Lemire tribunal hearing, but the submissions must be made by March 17th.
Please write a polite and professional letter to Ms Jessie Cyr outlining why you believe the hearing should be public.
If you can't write a polite letter, PLEASE DON'T WRITE. You will only hurt our case.
Here is my submission:
| Quote: |
March 12, 2008
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
160 Elgin Street
11th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4
Tel: (613) 995-1707
Email: gcyr@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Attn: Ghislaine (Jessie) Cyr - Registry Officer
Re: Warman v Lemire (T1073/5405)
Dear Ms Cyr
I am writing to request that the Warman v Lemire tribunal hearing that is scheduled for March 25, 2008 be open to the public.
It has come to our attention that evidence will be given that suggests that CHRC investigator Dean Steacy created an anonymous account on a website we owned shortly before a CHRC complaint was filed against us.
In addition, the Warman v Lemire case has become widely known on the Canadian internet, and many website owners feel that the outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications in regard to their free speech, and that of their members.
We feel that the presence of media and public observers would serve to increase security at the hearing. Since members of the internet community wish to see this matter dealt with in a speedy and professional manner, it is our desire to help maintain a safe and peaceful environment so that the Tribunal feels safe keeping the hearing open and public, so many sets of eyes will be on the lookout for disruptors.
Thank you very much in advance for considering this request.
Sincerely,
Connie and Mark Fournier |
_________________ "...single men must have access to donor eggs and “gestational carriers.” - David Johnston, Governor General Appointee
(The man Stephen Harper calls "the best of Canada") |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sponsor
|
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
|
 |
blueconJoined: 06 Aug 2007 Total posts: 6711 Location: Windsor,Ont Gender: Male
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Perhaps we should also write the Conservatives and make it known that they will not receive donations if they will be supporting the HRC holding tribunals closed to the public. Is this right out of the KGB manual? Kind of funny that Ayn Rand foresaw this in Atlas Shrugged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blueconJoined: 06 Aug 2007 Total posts: 6711 Location: Windsor,Ont Gender: Male
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wlyonmackenzie
Joined: 30 Oct 2002 Total posts: 14830 Location: Knee deep in Progressivist BS Gender: Male
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Polite hand-written letter have far more impact than signed computer print outs. _________________ Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive; those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. - C.S. Lewis, In Freedom .
Celebrate Hard Likker and Handgun week here at the Shadowy GroupTM  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Connie FournierMember
Joined: 06 Jan 2001 Total posts: 22169 Location: Kingston, Ontario Age: 44 Gender: Female
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wlyonmackenzie wrote: | | Polite hand-written letter have far more impact than signed computer print outs. |
True. But, remember, they have to have them in their hands by March 17th. _________________ "...single men must have access to donor eggs and “gestational carriers.” - David Johnston, Governor General Appointee
(The man Stephen Harper calls "the best of Canada") |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seraphim
Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Total posts: 391 Gender: Unknown
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I sent a letter via email just now.
Thanks for letting us know about this, Connie. _________________ "Someone who does not know the difference between good and evil is worth nothing.”
— Miecyslaw Kasprzyk, Polish rescuer of Jews during the Holocaust, New York Times, Jan. 30, 2005 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| cinyc Location: New York Gender: Unknown
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The key provisions that were used in the original order to close the hearing are Sections 52(1)(c) and (d) of the Human Rights Act:
"52. (1) An inquiry shall be conducted in public, but the member or panel conducting the inquiry may, on application, take any measures and make any order that the member or panel considers necessary to ensure the confidentiality of the inquiry if the member or panel is satisfied, during the inquiry or as a result of the inquiry being conducted in public, that
(c) there is a real and substantial risk that the disclosure of personal or other matters will cause undue hardship to the persons involved such that the need to prevent disclosure outweighs the societal interest that the inquiry be conducted in public; or
(d) there is a serious possibility that the life, liberty or security of a person will be endangered."
It might make sense mention those sections in any submission to the Tribunal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WestViking
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sent _________________ Hall Monitor of the Shadowy GroupTM
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fourhorses
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sent _________________ Freedom really does not evolve, it revolts.
Today`s rebel is a conservative and fiscal responsibility has become the new counterculture! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Connie FournierMember
Joined: 06 Jan 2001 Total posts: 22169 Location: Kingston, Ontario Age: 44 Gender: Female
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a fax number: 613-995-3484 _________________ "...single men must have access to donor eggs and “gestational carriers.” - David Johnston, Governor General Appointee
(The man Stephen Harper calls "the best of Canada") |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve
Joined: 24 Jan 2003 Total posts: 134 Location: Whitby, Ontario Age: 51 Gender: Male
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paycheck
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You know when my wife gets involved, it’s just GOT TO BE important.
If she can write a letter with four little ones to manage all day, you can sure as hell find the time too!
| Quote: | Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
160 Elgin Street, 11th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4
Tel: (613) 995-1707
Email: gcyr@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Attention: Ghislaine Cyr - Registry Officer
Re: Warman v Lemire (T1073/5405)
Dear Ms. Cyr,
I am writing in regards to the Warman vs. Lemire tribunal hearing that is scheduled for March 25, 2008.
This case has become very well known in Canada through the Internet. It has the potential to directly impact freedom of speech on thousands of Canadian websites and blogs. Therefore, I am asking that this tribunal hearing be open to the public.
I was born in Malawi, Africa. As a child I moved all over the world with my family due to my father’s career. Often we lived in countries with limited freedoms. When I was a teenager, my parents chose to emigrate to Canada because they admired its many freedoms. I sincerely hope that as a proud Canadian I can continue to live in a free and open society.
Out of respect for our democratic freedoms, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal should allow the Canadian media and public observers to attend the Warman vs. Lemire tribunal hearing.
I thank you for your consideration in this important matter.
Sincerely, |
_________________ Socon Or Bust: http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/
This triangle of truisms, of father, mother and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it. - G. K. Chesterton (The Superstition of Divorce) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paycheck
|
Posted: 03/ 12/ 08 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Social Conservatives United
March 13, 2008
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
160 Elgin Street, 11th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4
Tel: (613) 995-1707
Fax: (613) 995-3484
Email: gcyr@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Attention: Ghislaine Cyr
RE: Registry Officer Re: Warman v Lemire (T1073/5405)
_____________________________________________________
Dear Ms. Cyr,
I am writing in regards to the Warman vs. Lemire tribunal hearing that is scheduled for March 25, 2008.
The current conduct of the various human rights commissions in Canada, especially the Canadian Human Rights Commission, has come into serious question.
The credibility of any government organ is dependant on the ability to sustain transparency and fairness. To lose these qualities is to lose the support of the people and the moral authority to operate.
Over the past several weeks, there have been many serious and credible allegations made against the questionable tactics of the Canadian Human Rights Commissions. Since the controversial complaints and the questionable tactics of the CHRC impact all Canadians and their inalienable rights of free speech which are guaranteed under the Charter of Rights of Freedoms, it would be, in my humble opinion, a grave mistake to hold the above hearing behind closed doors. To do so in the current heated environment would only further damage the reputation of the Commission in a very significant way.
A government tribunal which has the power to levy significant fines and cause extreme hardship to their respondents must demonstrate an impeccable and just procedural mechanism for its operations. These necessary qualities are contingent on complete transparency and openness to the public.
If the Commission’s tactics are above reproach, then it has nothing to fear from the public.
John Pacheco, Director
Social Conservatives United
http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/?p=753 _________________ Socon Or Bust: http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/
This triangle of truisms, of father, mother and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it. - G. K. Chesterton (The Superstition of Divorce) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter O'Donnell
Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Total posts: 9072 Location: BC Age: 61 Gender: Male
|
Posted: 03/ 13/ 08 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
See my new thread entitled
It's official -- Harper blows us off.
There is no real hope of fighting these star chambers within the rules because they will do whatever they want to punish conservatives for holding conservative opinions, and our so-called Conservative government will stand idly by and watch, not even daring to say a negative word about the situation.
It would make better sense politically to resist by non-participation and a consistent stand which states that we hold the CHRC and for that matter, any courts seeking to try political opinions simply because they offend socialists, as evidence of an illegal and undeclared socialist revolution.
It is the duty of citizens to resist illegal revolutionary activity, and it is treason to engage in such activity. The consequences of that analysis of the situation would suggest that
(1) our government is derelict in its duty to uphold the spirit of the constitution, by allowing the judiciary extraordinary powers without challenge,
and (2) the citizens would be justified in any form of resistance to the people engaging in social revolution.
Just because the socialist revolution is undeclared does not change anything. We need to have the wisdom to understand that this is the situation, and react accordingly. Trying to work within their rules will get us nowhere, because they are not even disguising the fact that they are biased and in favour of punishment for those who violate the revolutionary principles they espouse.
Watch for more action on this alternative point of view in the coming days. There is a different way to proceed, and there seems little point in trying to talk sense into socialists -- this has never worked before. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|