View topic - Court Papers from Richard Warman :: Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 3:47 pm Post subject:

Go forth and multiply, bloggers.

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 3:48 pm Post subject:

oops wrong one
_________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS THEY KEEP YOU FREE. SUPPORT FARMERS, THEY FEED YOU.

SUPPORT ISRAEL

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 3:54 pm Post subject:

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:05 pm Post subject:

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:09 pm Post subject:

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:16 pm Post subject:

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:35 pm Post subject:

Looks like I am in very good company.
_________________
Hall Monitor of the Shadowy Group^TM
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks.

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:36 pm Post subject:

So far, I have seen nothing libelous in that document. Every allegation, every accusation is true.
_________________
"There are some opinions so stupid, only liberals could hold them"
-- after George Orwell

General Militia of Flight 93 reporting for duty!
"Let's Roll!"

"Groyser Chochem" of the Shadowy Group^TM

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:36 pm Post subject:

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:39 pm Post subject:

never even mention my organization. Racist bastad.

_________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS THEY KEEP YOU FREE. SUPPORT FARMERS, THEY FEED YOU.

SUPPORT ISRAEL

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:46 pm Post subject:

Wait a minute... isn't klinxx RW? he has finally sued himself... WTG
_________________
My Canada does not include Quebec bring on the vote

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:46 pm Post subject:

...continued from Page 1.

Posting 44

101. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by HR-101 on 23 September 2007 at 4:16 am:

Richard Warman is no more than a cheap-jack, cyber-bullying pseudo Nazi... the antisemites, Neo-Nazis, and white supremacists he has pursued are soft targets- only kooks and moonbats support crazies like that.

All this "legend in his own ( simply retarded) mind" is doing here is attempting to censor and suppress what he disagrees with.

If you never believe another word I write, believe this, and believe it well:

If he is allowed to get away with this travesty, it will not stop here. Others will be silenced, one by one...

...until no-one is left to speak, but jackals like himself.

All he needs is a broken cross ( Swastika) on an armband to complete his image...

( And a brown shirt...
...and a skull, with lightning bolts-- do you all remember that the SS was called "protection services?" )

Right! A Nazi hunter who turned Nazi himself. Adopting their tactics and using them against everyone in sight that doesn't agree with him.

102. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a bully who attempts to censor and suppress anything he disagrees with.

b. Plaintiff is a jackal, someone who commits base acts.

c. Plaintiff is a Nazi, comparable to the Nazi SS (Shutzstaffel), and uses Nazi-like tactics against those that don't agree with him.

Posting 45

103. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the
Freedominion website by backwoods on 23 September 2007 at 1:33 pm:

"Good point. I think he is a coward."

104. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly
stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding
circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by
innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a coward.

Posting 46

105. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the
Freedominion website by Padraigh on 9 October 2007 at 4:39 am:

"Warman is really trying to to censor all negative opinions about himself it seems.

Some Backstory: Fromm has already spent thousands battling a Warman Libel suit because Fromm called Warman a "Censor".

106. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a censor.

b. Plaintiff is attempting to censor all negative opinions about himself

Posting 47

107. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by backwoods on 12 October 2007 at 4:32 pm:

"YEah, but some people who are minding their own business and some f head like Cryman sticks his nose in their face and like the coward I think he is, uses the system to harass them, definitely would have a much different reaction than the typical MGH who are intimidated by the system.

I think he is a real idiot because sooner or later he will pick the wrong guy and suffer the consequences. I know some people, and if they were bothered, I would say that the idiot who bothered them, would have to be tired of living."

108. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a coward.

Posting 48

109. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by HR-101 on 19 October 2007 at 7:13 pm:

"Warman is absolutely insane. I said it before and I'll say it again, who the hell does think he is to abuse by lawsuit anyone who would dare to critique him.

Even God is up for critique, warman you idiot!

I went to the link and he IS acting exactly what he's complaining about others pointing out

And going to sue just because someone pointed it out to him.

He IS acting exactly like A dictatorial tyrant. An Nazi SS thug, a Stalin thug, a commie thug, an Iranian thug

And no one here is responsible for the labels he's collected.

He is the one who is solely responsible for those labels by his very own actions.

That warman has a mind of an a squawking tantrum throwing little infantile 10 year old.

He has the mind of an infant in a adult body.

That jerk badly needs a couple hundred visits to a shrink!

He is one sick person.!"

110. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a dictatorial tyrant, a Nazi, and a Stalinist.

The Third Thread - "FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO CARE ABOUT FD"

Posting 49
111. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by conscience on 20 September 2007 at 1:59 pm: "This poster is of the opinion that Richard Warman is a felching fecalphiliac."

112. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a sexual deviant.

The Fourth Thread –
"Human rights tribunal order Calgary woman to stop spreading hate on Internet"

Posting 50

113. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Connie Fournier on 27 October 2007 at 9:35 pm:

"What an absolute sleazeball!!!

I have no doubt that I would despise this girl's political philosophy, but I'm tired of watching this human wrecking ball use the system to destroy people's lives and to make money for himself!!"

114. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a human wrecking ball using the legal system to destroy people's lives for the purposes of financial gain.

Posting 51

115. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Dave From Alberta on 27 October 2007 at 10:04 pm:

"Now that is something I did not understand. A person can actually profit, even make a living, by making CHRC Complaints. Would be a good way to get some extra pocket money if a person were completely lacking in scruples."

116. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff's motivation in his human rights work is profiteering.

b. Plaintiff is completely lacking in scruples.

Posting 52

117. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by TomFoolery on 27 October 2007 at 10:11 pm:

"From: http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?ld=Oble968b¬7eda-4d7f-aae4-d3305e6929b5&k=55879

wrote:

Mr. Warman said he was "somewhat disappointed" that the fines weren't higher, but added: "It's the decision and the permanent cease and desist order that is the important thing."

In July 2006, the RCMP's hate crimes unit raided the Coquitlam, B.C. home that Ms. Beaumont shared with her then boyfriend, Ciaran Donnelly, after a complaint by Mr. Warman.

The police, acting under Criminal Code provisions dealing with hate propaganda and advocating genocide, seized computers, clothes, books and Nazi memorabilia. To date, no charges have been laid.

I hope I'm wrong - but it appears the litigation strategy being employed looks like this:

a) File a Criminal Charge against a target - therefore giving the police access to the target's home to enter and seize property and information;

b) Then, press charges in a Civil Lawsuit where the target is sued for (financial) damages (hurt feelings) ... All this while the threat of potential Criminal Charges lingers;

c) Note, criminal charges were not actually laid !!! but appear to have been used to facilitate the civil action.

Does anybody know the technical legal definition for extortion ?

If this is a correct interpretation - the misappropriation of state power is getting uglier and more abusive by the day

118. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff has committed the criminal offence of extortion.

b. Plaintiff misappropriates state power in an ugly and abusive fashion.

Posting 53

119. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by WestViking on 27 October 2007 at 11:34 pm:

TomFoolery wrote:

From: http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.htmi?ld=Oble968b¬7eda-4d7f-aae4-d3305e6929b5&k=55879

wrote:

Mr. Warman said he was "somewhat disappointed" that the fines weren't higher, but added: "It's the decision and the permanent cease and desist order that is the important thing."

In July 2006, the RCMP's hate crimes unit raided the Coquitlam, B.C. home that Ms. Beaumont shared with her then boyfriend, Ciaran Donnelly, after a complaint by Mr. Warman.

The police, acting under Criminal Code provisions dealing with hate propaganda and advocating genocide, seized computers, clothes, books and Nazi memorabilia. To date, no charges have been laid.

I hope I'm wrong - but it appears the litigation strategy being employed looks like this:

a) File a Criminal Charge against a target - therefore giving the police access to the target's home to enter and seize property and information;

b) Then, press charges in a Civil Lawsuit where the target is sued for (financial) damages (hurt feelings) ... All this while the threat of potential Criminal Charges lingers;

c) Note, criminal charges were not actually laid H! but appear to have been used to facilitate the civil action.

Does anybody know the technical legal definition for extortion ?

If this is a correct interpretation - the misappropriation of state power is getting uglier and more abusive by the day.

120. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff has committed the criminal offence of extortion.

b. Plaintiff misappropriates state power in an ugly and abusive fashion.

Posting 54

121. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by TomFoolery on 28 October 2007 at 10:18 pm:

"Or he may have ancestors that perished under the rule of the Nazi's, and is trying to continue a war that ended over 60 years ago, and unwittingly is using the same tools of Statism against his enemy as what happened in reverse."

122. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff's human rights work is comparable to the acts committed by the Nazis.

Posting 55

123. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Mark Fournier (Entropy Squared) on 28 October 2007 at 11:29 pm:

"A litigating predator."

124. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a legal predator, a lawyer who lives by the destruction of others.

The Fifth Thread
- "Richard Warman has made $48,500 through the CHRC so far!"

Posting 56

125. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Connie Fournier on 30 October 2007 at 8:12 am:

"How is it even legal for an individual to enrich himself by using a government agency to attack people who are usually too poor to even hire a lawyer??"

126. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff uses the Canadian Human Rights Commission to attack the poor and defenceless with the desire of enriching himself.

Posting 57

127. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Mark Fournier (Entropy Squared) on 30 October 2007 at 9:28 am:

"It appears this guy is using the CHRC and the civil courts to attack people who are too poor to mount a legal defense, all for personal gain."

128. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff uses the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the courts to attack the poor and defenceless with the sole desire of obtaining personal gain.

Posting 58

129. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Fabulous Fred on 30 October 2007 at 10:05 am:

Entropy Squared wrote:

It appears this guy is using the CHRC and the civil courts to attack people who are too poor to mount a legal defense, all for personal gain.
People say military intelligence is an oxymoron, but could the DND really not know what Warman has been up to? Or do they know and approve?

We have done some searches of IPs from emails we've received from Richard Warman. Most of these emails arrived during regular working hours and several bore an IP address that leads to 100 Constellation, Ottawa.

This address appears to house the Provincial Courts and the Ottawa municipal offices. Does anyone from Ottawa know if the DND also has an office there?

130. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff uses the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the courts to attack the poor and defenceless with the sole desire of obtaining personal gain.

The Sixth Thread
- "Hate message posted by Richard Warman ? warning****"

Posting 59

131. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by fourhorses on 30 October 2007 at 1:58 pm: Hate message posted by Richard Warman ? warning ****

Note:
I found this on a political forum blog.
I have left the EXACT wording as-is. Although the language is iinappropriate for family viewing on FD, it seemed necessary to archive this as Warman has requested this posting not be archived.

The first quote below appears to be posted by the forum administrator. The second quote below is attributed to Richard Warman.

Clicking on the "view profile" comes up empty as Google says:
This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use.
-------------------------------
Quote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 2 days (Nov 1, 6:51 pm).

Richard Warman wrote:

I, Richard Warman, do hereby challenge you degenerate, scumbag, racist White motherfuckers to a duel to the death. If you want to find out more about me, and what I stand for, just do a Google search on my name. My reputation speaks for itself! I'm so afraid of you that I'm **publicly** publishing my home address and telephone number:

xxx address,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, KIN IA7 Phone: (613) xxx-xxxx
E-mail: somename@,vahoo.ca

I **DARE** you assholes to stop by and say hello!! I hope you do, because I'll kick your blasted cowardly, racist asses! I know you creeps talk the talk, but do you walk the walk? I **know** you don't have the guts to confront me face to face! I'm waiting, you sorry, chickenshit White crackers, I'm waiting!! I don't need the Ottawa police to protect me from you snivelling slimeballs! Go ahead, make my day! Richard Warman is my name, "Maximum Disruption" is my game!

132. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff posted a profanity-strewn message to the Google website forum containing threats of violence.

Posting 60

133. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by fourhorses on 30 October 2007 at 1:58 pm:

"That was my first thought, Styky. You are right, Warman is not a stupid guy. But anyone who would pose as someone else to inflame other posters on different web forums, then use that to pursue legal avenues to their own monetary advantage ...

That's why I posted option (c) ????

Is he playing the victim here ?'

134. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Posting 59 above was an attempt by the Plaintiff to falsely portray himself as a victim.

Posting 61

135. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by Doug on the Right Side on 30 October 2007 at 3:02 pm:

" The Address is correct. It has been posted on several of the sites I have visited while researching this guy. He lives in an OTTAWA PUBLIC HOUSING UNIT FOLKS!!! That is TAXPAYER funded housing. I repeat ... how can it be justified that a gainfully employed lawyer can qualify for Rent-to-income SUBSIDIZED housing? That is absolutely an abuse."

136. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a lawyer who abuses social assistance and has committed fraud against the public purse.

The Seventh Thread
- "Enter the Free Dominion / Western Standard Writing Contest!"

Posting 62

137. The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by brityank58 on 20 September 2007 at 6:07 pm:

Peter O'Donnell wrote:
Here's some topics you can use if you need inspiration:

1. All hail Paul Martin, leader for life

2. Ezra Levant is Canada's smartest person

3. Why I Wish I Had Never Dated Rachel Marsden

4. Except for the Communist mind-control, Canada is a pretty cool place

5. Belinda, You Forgot Your Handcuffs

6. My Global Warming Lesbian Wedding

7. Ein reich, ein volk, ein Harper

8. This gulag sucks

Y'all forgot one:

9. Richard Warman Terrorist

138. The Posting in question contained serious allegations against the Plaintiff, clearly stating, in its plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo that:

a. Plaintiff is a terrorist.

Defamation

139. The Plaintiff complains of the words set out in paragraphs 13 through 138 that were intended to mean and were understood to mean that:

a. That the Plaintiff's honesty, integrity, ethics, and professionalism as a lawyer should be questioned;

b. That the Plaintiff has committed acts of criminal misconduct and/or illegal activities;

c. The Plaintiff is engaged in unscrupulous activities;

d. The Plaintiff is a sexual deviant;

e. The Plaintiff is a censor, or an advocate of censorship;

f. The Plaintiff is immoral;

g. The Plaintiff is a coward;

h. The Plaintiff is a Nazi, fascist, and Stalinist;

i. The Plaintiff is a terrorist and involved with the support and financing of a terrorist group;

j. The Plaintiff has committed treason;

k. The Plaintiff is a homosexual and homosexuality is associated with paedophilia.

Actual Malice

140. The Plaintiff pleads that the Defendants acted maliciously in that:

a. After the notices of libel were sent to the Defendants, they not only published the libel notices containing all of the defamatory material in condensed form, but they continue to post and publish new defamatory materials;

b. The Defendants have not, as of this date, removed any of the Postings;

c. The Defendants have not, as of this date, retracted the Postings and/or apologized to the Plaintiff for having defamed him.

d. The Defendants have incited others to post further defamatory material.

e. The Defendants have sought to attack the Plaintiff's employment.

f. The Defendants have published threats of violence against the Plaintiff.

141. The Plaintiff pleads that as a result of the Postings, his personal and professional reputation have suffered; the Plaintiff has been brought into ridicule, scandal and contempt both personally and by way of his professional as a lawyer, the Plaintiff's livelihood has been threatened; and the Plaintiff has suffered damages.

142. The Plaintiff states that the conduct of the Defendants towards him has been malicious, reckless and reprehensible and in complete and total disregard for his personal and professional reputation and that such conduct warrants the imposition of aggravated and punitive damages.

143. The Plaintiff pleads and relies on the Libel and Slander Act, R.S.O. 1990, c-L.12.

144. The Plaintiff pleads and relies on the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C-43, as amended, and more specifically on Rule 1.05 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194 as amended, to obtain an order from this Honorable Court forcing the Defendants to have the Postings removed from the website; the posting of a full retraction with as much clarity and prominence as the defamatory and libelous words spoken and/or written and/or published; and, a permanent injunction prohibiting the publication of further defamatory material.

145. The Plaintiff agrees to reduce his claim to $50,000.00 to bring this action within the Simplified Procedure found under rule 76 of the Rules of Civil Procedure R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194 as amended.

146. The Plaintiff requests that this action be tried in Ottawa, Ontario.

DOCUMENT #2

ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

IN THE MATTER OF an intended action

BETWEEN

RICHARD WARMAN
Plaintiff

and

CONSTANCE WILKINS-FOURNIER
and
MARK FOURNIER
and
JOHN DOES 1-8
Defendants

NOTICE

Pursuant to section 5(1) of the Libel and Slander Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.12,

PLEASE BE ADVISED that you have written words and/or published words that are defamatory and libellous to me appearing on the website "www.freedominion.ca".

The material appears on web pages within the following thread:

1) Richard Warman attacks free speech...

This material is located at:

www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=87357&start=495&sid=8565716cdffc7f 297cc80faf0660466d

The Plaintiff complains of the following words, as were posted on the Freedominion website by HR-101 on 19 October 2007 at 7:13 pm:

"Warman is absolutely insane. I said it before and I'll say it again, who the hell does think he is to abuse by lawsuit anyone who would dare to critique him.

Even God is up for critique, warman you idiot!.

I went to the link and he IS acting exactly what he's complaining about others pointing out

And going to sue just because someone pointed it out to him.

He IS acting exactly like A dictatorial tyrant. An Nazi SS thug, a Stalin thug, a commie thug, an Iranian thug

And no one here is responsible for the labels he's collected.

He is the one who is solely responsible for those labels by his very own actions.

That warman has a mind of an a squawking tantrum throwing little infantile 10 year old.

He has the mind of an infant in a adult body.

That jerk badly needs a couple hundred visits to a shrink! He is one sick person.!"

This material first came to my knowledge at some point between 19 October 2007 and today.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT you have written words and/or published words that contain serious allegations against me, clearly stating among other things to the readers of the website www.freedominion.ca in their plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of the surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo, that you are questioning my morality, integrity, and professionalism; that I am a dictatorial tyrant; a Nazi SS thug, and a Stalinist thug.

You have defamed and libelled me in my skill, judgement, and/or capacity in my profession.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT the words spoken and/or written and/or published, in their plain and ordinary meaning or by virtue of the surrounding circumstances which give the words a defamatory meaning inferentially or by innuendo, are completely and absolutely false, defamatory, and libellous.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT I request a complete retraction be published on the website www.freedominion.ca with as much clarity and prominence as the defamatory and libellous words spoken and/or written and/or published.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT it is my intention to commence an action for libel against you.

THIS NOTICE is served upon you pursuant to the paragraph 5(1) of the Libel and Slander Act, R. S.O. 1990, ch. L-12.

Date: 13 November 2007

Richard Warman
Barrister and Solicitor

Agent for service only:
Heenan Blaikie LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
55 Metcalfe Street
Suite 300
Ottawa, Ontario, KIP 6L5
F. 613 236.9632

TO:
CONSTANCE WILKINS-FOURNIER
Kingston, Ontario

and
MARK FOURNIER
Kingston, Ontario

DOCUMENT #3

Court file number: 07-CV-39927SR

Ontario
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

BETWEEN:

RICHARD WARMAN
Plaintiff

and

CONSTANCE WILKINS-FOURNIER and MARK FOURNIER and JOHN DOES 1-8
Defendants

OFFER TO SETTLE BY PLAINTIFF

The Plaintiff offers to settle this proceeding with Constance Wilkins-Fournier and Mark Fournier ('Defendants' for the purposes of this offer to settle) on the following terms:

1. The Defendants will pay the Plaintiff the sum of $10,000.00 for general, aggravated, and punitive damages.

2. Within one week of accepting this offer, the Defendants will remove or have removed the words that are defamatory and libellous to Richard Warman from their website and any other websites where they have published defamatory and libellous material about Richard, Warman. Within one week of accepting this offer the Defendants will also publish a retraction of all of the material alleged in this claim to be defamatory and libellous to Richard Warman. The Defendants will also publish in the same means as the libellous material was originally published, to any and all others to whom the Defendant may have sent the defamatory material. All retractions will be published with as much clarity and prominence as the defamatory and libellous words were published.

3. If the Defendants accept this offer prior to December 13, 2007 at 5:00 pm the Defendants will pay $900.00 in costs to the Plaintiff. If the Defendant accepts this offer after December 13, 2007 at 5:00 pm the Defendant will pay the Plaintiffs' costs incurred after December 13, 2007 at 5:00 pm to the date of acceptance on a substantial indemnity basis as agreed by the parties or as assessed.

4. This offer is open for acceptance until it is withdrawn by the Plaintiff or until 5 minutes after the commencement of the trial of this matter.

Dated this 19th day of November, 2007.

Richard Warman
Barrister and Solicitor

Agent for service only:

Heenan Blaikie LLP
Barristers & Solicitors 55 Metcalfe Street
Suite 300
Ottawa, Ontario, KIP 6L5 F. 613 236.9632

TO:

CONSTANCE WILKINS-FOURNIER and MARK FOURNIER
Kingston, Ontario
_________________
"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you." - Entropy Squared

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:52 pm Post subject:

Nope. Can't find a single untruth, lie, or slander in that last post.

Every single allegation is true, and provable.
_________________
"There are some opinions so stupid, only liberals could hold them"
-- after George Orwell

General Militia of Flight 93 reporting for duty!
"Let's Roll!"

"Groyser Chochem" of the Shadowy Group^TM

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:54 pm Post subject:

Ah yes but did the document contan the official seal?

_________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS THEY KEEP YOU FREE. SUPPORT FARMERS, THEY FEED YOU.

SUPPORT ISRAEL

Posted: 11/ 23/ 07 4:54 pm Post subject:

Hey, Connie and Mark... edit this past post to take your address off it at the bottom... you never know the kind of moonbats that will visit.
_________________
The above is MY OPINION, and DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINIONS OF THE OWNERSHIP OF FREE DOMINION.
Proud
If the Canadian flag offends you, or if you don't like being a part of Canada, then you should consider another Canadian freedom: the right to leave"

	The time now is 07/ 29/ 10 5:41 am
	Home ∴ Forum ∴ Recent ∴ Register ∴ Profile ∴ Log in to check your private messages ∴ Log in FAQ ∴ Search ∴ Donate ∴ Activist's Toolbox ∴ FD Links ∴ FD Swag [ Login to join chat ] FD Arcade - Click Here-->