The time now is 09/ 02/ 10 10:22 pm 
Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum Index
Home  ∴ Forum  ∴ Recent  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in
FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Donate ∴  Activist's Toolbox ∴  FD Links ∴  FD Swag  

[ Login to join chat ]  FD Arcade - Click Here-->    
   

Walker
Armory
Edward Kennedy
C2C Journal
 Charter of Rights and Freedoms Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  

 

 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexRepublic of Canada
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Offlinedibattista
Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Total posts: 16
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 5:39 pm    Post subject: Charter of Rights and Freedoms Reply with quote

OK, because it's contained in the constitution, I thought I'd stick this question here.

Currently I'm a first year BBA student at Wilfred Laurier Univeristy, I've been a supporter of the Reform Party (Back in the Day), then the Alliance, and now sit on my EDA's board of directors as well as being actively involved in the campaign.

For my poli-sci class this term we are required to write an essay, and I found the list of topics last night.

My topic is, "Does the Charter of Rights give unelected judges too much power in the Canadian political system?"

Now natually I think it does give judges too much power, but I'm wondering if anyone can recommend good books/journal articles where I can find credible quotes and opinions of "scholars" as to the validity of this statement.

Thanks,

Julian DiBattista
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
littleharbour
Avatar

Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 5:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Charter of Rights and Freedoms Reply with quote

dibattista wrote:
OK, because it's contained in the constitution, I thought I'd stick this question here.

Currently I'm a first year BBA student at Wilfred Laurier Univeristy, I've been a supporter of the Reform Party (Back in the Day), then the Alliance, and now sit on my EDA's board of directors as well as being actively involved in the campaign.

For my poli-sci class this term we are required to write an essay, and I found the list of topics last night.

My topic is, "Does the Charter of Rights give unelected judges too much power in the Canadian political system?"

Now natually I think it does give judges too much power, but I'm wondering if anyone can recommend good books/journal articles where I can find credible quotes and opinions of "scholars" as to the validity of this statement.

Thanks,

Julian DiBattista


I'm sure there is something out there. Do we get co-authorship if we help you out? Cheesy
Back to top
View user's profile 
WereYouAware
PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Call Ian Hunter - Professor Emeritus of Law at Univ of Western Ontario. He has written a lot on the subject of the Charter and its impact on Canada. Rory Leishman a columnist for the London Free Press is an expert on the issue you mention. Google either of these men and find some articles they wrote. Call UWO or London free Press if you need to be in contact with them personally.
Best of luck
Back to top
View user's profile 
littleharbour
Avatar

Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got these links in about 5 minutes on google. You kids really need to learn how to research Cool

http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?snav=nr&id=540

http://www.journal.law.mcgill.ca/abs/vol48/3choud.html

http://www2.clarku.edu/research/access/government/millerD.shtml

http://www.fathersforlife.org/Sodhi/remarks_McLachlin4.htm

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_1741500815_3/Supreme_Court_of_Canada.html

http://osgoode.yorku.ca/pdpwebsite.nsf/0/96ef37871f8d350585256d5900711950?OpenDocument

http://www.journal.law.mcgill.ca/abs/vol49/3manfr.html

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/aboutcourt/judges/speeches/DemocraticRoles_e.asp

http://www.chp.ca/CHP-Communique/Comm-12-48.htm

Quote:

http://www.irwinlaw.com/books.cfm?series_id=5&pub_id=55&review_id=58

The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue

The Supreme Court of Canada has been accused of allowing criminals to go free; of permitting tobacco companies to advertise; of being too sympathetic to Aboriginal people; and of usurping democracy on abortion and gay rights. Some critics claim that the nine unelected judges on Canada's highest Court have used the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to impose their own views on public policy over those of elected governments. This book joins the crucial debate about the Charter, the Court, and Canadian democracy.

What is judicial activism?

Is the Charter making us like America where the politics of the judges can determine the outcome of a national election?

Can judges simply read their own political preferences into the Charter?

Does the Court have the last word over democratically elected legislatures?

Are our judges captives of special interests?

What can Canadians and their governments do if they think the Court has got it wrong?

These are some of the questions that Kent Roach considers in this important and timely book. In a clear, engaging, and thought-provoking manner, Roach strips away the rhetoric that has characterized much of the debate over judicial activism. As counsel who has appeared before the Court in several of its most important Charter cases, he provides unique insights into the work of the Court. As a leading professor of Constitutional and Criminal Law, he offers an informed assessment of the Court's decisions and their impact on our legal and political system. In short, The Supreme Court on Trial makes an important contribution to understanding the role of the Court and the Charter in our democracy.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlinedibattista
Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Total posts: 16
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

littleharbour wrote:
I got these links in about 5 minutes on google. You kids really need to learn how to research Cool



I think I know how to research Razz

My method, post a thread on a related message board. The sources just come flying in. Very Happy

BTW, thanks to everyone who responded.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlinemynameishuynh
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Total posts: 2209
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlinemynameishuynh
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Total posts: 2209
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nice gun
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineImperialNationalist
Avatar

Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Total posts: 334

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grab just about any book written by F.L. Morton & Rainer Knoff. Law, Politics & The Judicial Process in Canada; Charter Politics; The Charter Revolution & The Court Party in Canada; etc. All of those should provide you with some good material.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineLiberallyConservative
Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Total posts: 3935
Location: Liberal-central - Toronto ON
Age: 26
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It may also be useful to read up on the issue of judicial activism (either in Canada or in the U.S. - the U.S. particularly should yield a bevy of articles and works) and then apply what your findings to determine how we stack up.

It may also be useful to point out that the whole purpose of Constitutional documents is to prevent arbitrary judgments or moves by the people in power, which is not to say that there can be no amendments, but obviously these amendments ought to reflect the wishes of the majority, instead of the unelected and unaccountable few.

You might also want to point out some examples where the judgments of our justices have (whether intentionally or not) been used to justify things not found in the actual Charter of Rights and Freedoms (i.e. same-sex marriage, or even the whole idea of gay rights - as far as the Charter goes, it seems that gays, lesbians, and transgendered folk have the exact same rights as the rest of us - hence their omission from Article 15 of the Charter, which discusses minority rights).

You could also discuss how the judges are overwhelmingly liberal, and that this bias is reflected in their initiatives and rulings.
_________________
http://dai-head-jai.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlinedibattista
Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Total posts: 16
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mynameishuynh wrote:


Wow!! You're pretty good with you're research Razz
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineI am Conservative
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Total posts: 206
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
OK, because it's contained in the constitution, I thought I'd stick this question here.

Currently I'm a first year BBA student at Wilfred Laurier Univeristy, I've been a supporter of the Reform Party (Back in the Day), then the Alliance, and now sit on my EDA's board of directors as well as being actively involved in the campaign.

For my poli-sci class this term we are required to write an essay, and I found the list of topics last night.

My topic is, "Does the Charter of Rights give unelected judges too much power in the Canadian political system?"

Now natually I think it does give judges too much power, but I'm wondering if anyone can recommend good books/journal articles where I can find credible quotes and opinions of "scholars" as to the validity of this statement.

Thanks,

Julian DiBattista


Where have I heard your name before? It sounds very familiar.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineCelebrateLife
Joined: 13 Apr 2005
Total posts: 1244
Location: Not far from Queen's Park
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 7:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Charter of Rights and Freedoms Reply with quote

dibattista wrote:
My topic is, "Does the Charter of Rights give unelected judges too much power in the Canadian political system?"

Now natually I think it does give judges too much power, but I'm wondering if anyone can recommend good books/journal articles where I can find credible quotes and opinions of "scholars" as to the validity of this statement.


How much power is "too much"? How "unelected" is unelected and is that a good or a bad thing? What are the consequences/implications of giving judges "too much power" via the Charter of Rights?

You've plainly stated your own view and appear to be looking for someone else to give their blessing that your view is correct. That's not exactly what research is about, nor the basis for a "principled" discussion.

Judges in Canada are "unelected" -- as they are in most jurisdictions. However they are appointed by a system which is accountable to elected officials and who, ultimately, do appoint the Judges That Matter.

I'm not crazy about the notion of voting for a judge (or a local sherrif) on the ballot alongside my member of parliament. I frankly DO NOT want politics playing a role in the judiciary.

Laws are created by men and women elected regularly by you and me. They are rarely legal experts and they certainly don't have time to weigh the pros and cons of every law. The judiciary, however, are charged with exactly that: are new laws "legal"? Do they respect community standards and generations of precedent? Are these laws set out as knee-jerk reactions or do they merit reinforcement?

Take the SSM issue. Legal experts -- judges -- have ruled in several jurisdictions that the long-held view that the term "marriage" could ONLY embody an opposite sex couple no longer met community standards -- in this case, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as set out five generations after Canada's founding.

These rulings did not come about because judges decided the law needed changing: living, breathing citizens brought the case to court because they believed the community standard had changed. The rest of the people, as represented by provincial attorneys general, argued the standards had NOT changed -- and lost. Repeatedly.

Absolutely nothing compelled Parliament to change the federal law, despite the provinicial judges asking for it. Parliament could well have written a new law to re-apply federal standards provincially or appeal the provincial rulings to the federal court which has the power to over-turn the (appointed by elected politicians) provincial judges.

In fact, the feds still have the power to overturn SSM with a simple act of Parliament and test the validity of their new law against the Charter. If they don't like that outcome they still have the opportunity to amend the Charter (which has been amended a few times already, despite the rhetoric to the contrary).

So, do "unelected" judges have "too much" power since the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? I, for one, would be interested in reading your final paper.

Democracy is a funny thing: the reality is any one of us is unlikely to be happy with every decision which flows out of it all the time. However when we examine the facts closely, most of us can agree that the present system -- evolving as the rest of society evolves -- protects all of us equally and gives all of us equal opportunities to make changes and influence the world we live in for the better.

Some things do keep me awake at night: "activist judges" in Canada do not.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineCdnRepublican
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Total posts: 9432
Location: Jerusalem, beating back the hordes of the anti-christ.
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin and Knopf, The Charter Revolution and the Court Party.

Ever wonder how Gay rights became a Cdn value?
Read this book and find out why.
CoR is a opaque text of legalese that give gasp! lawyers more work to do and gov't more things to regulate.
Big surprise.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Offlinerbacon
Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Total posts: 11061
Location: At The Oars of the Slave Ship Canada
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could start off your paper by stating this fact. It was cobbled up by Jean Chretien and the Liberal Party of Canada and not one single adult Canadian man or woman was ever allowed to vote for or against the Charter or anyother Constitutional Document at anytime in the history of Canada.
_________________
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. -- Samuel Adams, speech at the Philadelphia State House, August 1, 1776--"If You Haven't Suffered Enough It Is Your God Given Right To Suffer Some More" Wm. Aberhart Alberta Premier
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflinePeter O'Donnell
Avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Total posts: 9072
Location: BC
Age: 61
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 12/ 29/ 05 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Canada is a borderline judicial dictatorship. You bet unelected judges have too much power. They meddle in social policy on behalf of a federal government too afraid of electoral consequences to do the dirty work, and on the other hand they impose light sentences on repeat criminals. I wish we could elect our judges in Canada and get rid of most of this bunch.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
Display posts from previous:   
 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexRepublic of Canada


 

 Charter of Rights and Freedoms Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
  Home ∴  Forum ∴  Recent ∴  FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in



Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs topic RSS feed 
Google Sitemap Generator
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group