The time now is 09/ 02/ 10 10:21 pm 
Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum Index
Home  ∴ Forum  ∴ Recent  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in
FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Donate ∴  Activist's Toolbox ∴  FD Links ∴  FD Swag  

[ Login to join chat ]  FD Arcade - Click Here-->    
   

Warman's Latest Trick
mckenzie
Edward Kennedy
C2C Journal
 The Official Live Warman vs Lemire CHRT Decision Thread Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 Page 3 of 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  

 

 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexCensorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OfflineGerry T. Neal
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Total posts: 1216
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Age: 34
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jay Currie wrote:
The practical effect of the ruling in Lemire will, I expect, be tested almost immediately in the Topham matter. If he hasn't already I would expect Topham will file an application to have Harry's complaint dismissed on the basis that the Tribunal, based on today's decision, does not have the constitutional authority to breach Tophams s. 2 rights.

Tribunal members are not, strictly speaking, bound by the decisions of other members; but as a matter of practice the Tribunal tends to cite its own decisions as precedental. We'll see what happens in Topham.


What do you suppose the complainant's response will be to the decision today? Accept the decision? Appeal it if he can? Pretend it didn't happen and file another Section 13 complaint against somebody else?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
OfflineMaikeru
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Total posts: 4880
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jay Currie wrote:
The practical effect of the ruling in Lemire will, I expect, be tested almost immediately in the Topham matter. If he hasn't already I would expect Topham will file an application to have Harry's complaint dismissed on the basis that the Tribunal, based on today's decision, does not have the constitutional authority to breach Tophams s. 2 rights.

Tribunal members are not, strictly speaking, bound by the decisions of other members; but as a matter of practice the Tribunal tends to cite its own decisions as precedental. We'll see what happens in Topham.
One wonders whether Harry himself won't make an application to dismiss for the same reasons.
It would be face-saving, and convey the impression of being on top of evolving legal issues.

Harry's foray into the so-called 'right-wing' arena of the blogosphere has likely been a bit of an eye-opener.
_________________
“There were not six million Jews murdered; there was one murder, six million times.— Holocaust survivor Abel Herzberg
"Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like." - Chesterton -
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineGerry T. Neal
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Total posts: 1216
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Age: 34
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maikeru wrote:
One wonders whether Harry himself won't make an application to dismiss for the same reasons.
It would be face-saving, and convey the impression of being on top of evolving legal issues.

Harry's foray into the so-called 'right-wing' arena of the blogosphere has likely been a bit of an eye-opener.


Judging from his last post over at Jay's blog, I doubt it. He seems to be interpreting the decision differently than most of us are. But I suppose only time and Harry himself will tell.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
OfflineMaikeru
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Total posts: 4880
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maikeru wrote:
Jay Currie wrote:
The practical effect of the ruling in Lemire will, I expect, be tested almost immediately in the Topham matter. If he hasn't already I would expect Topham will file an application to have Harry's complaint dismissed on the basis that the Tribunal, based on today's decision, does not have the constitutional authority to breach Tophams s. 2 rights.

Tribunal members are not, strictly speaking, bound by the decisions of other members; but as a matter of practice the Tribunal tends to cite its own decisions as precedental. We'll see what happens in Topham.
One wonders whether Harry himself won't make an application to dismiss for the same reasons.
It would be face-saving, and convey the impression of being on top of evolving legal issues.

Harry's foray into the so-called 'right-wing' arena of the blogosphere has likely been a bit of an eye-opener.

Update - A Huge Win No Matter What:

Harry Abrams wrote:
truewest wrote:
Long story short: Hadjis distinguishes Taylor on the grounds that s. 54 of the Act, which provides for fines of up to $10,000, payable to the state, for breaches of s. 13, was not part of the legislation when Taylor was heard and that, as a result of this penal consequence, s. 13 no longer meets the minimal impairment leg of the Oakes test and is unconstitutional. Since a tribunal does not have the power to issue a formal declaration of constitutional invalidity, Hadjis simply refused to apply s. 13 to Lemire.
Will the CHRC appeal? Unlikely, given that it recommended the repeal of s. 54 in its recent report to Parliament. Will Warman? Probably not. Will Parliament repeal s.13, s.54 or both? My bet would be on the repeal of s.54, but not s.13. But we shall see.
Just finished reading the decision, and IMHO Truewest’s observation above sounds right.

Penalties to be imposed only after contempt of a cease and desist order.

I’m good with that.

_________________
“There were not six million Jews murdered; there was one murder, six million times.— Holocaust survivor Abel Herzberg
"Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like." - Chesterton -
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineJ.B. Stone
Avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2003
Total posts: 42064
Location: Northwest Montana
Age: 61
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK....

I'm CERTAINLY no "expert" on Canadian laws, statutes, and the like....

But, it DOES appear that Little Dickie Warbaby has just run out of ammo..... Army Smokin'


....gee.....how sad....!!!!

ROTFL

Can someone explain, in simple terms, how this effects Connie & Mark....???

It sounds all the while that Warman's lawsuit is circling the drain in respect to them and the economic HARM he has attempted to perpetrate against them.

I guess everyone owes Marc LeMire [sp?] a vote of gratitude for HIS foresight and forbearance against all odds..... Applause

Horrors.....it just occurred to me.....is this "decision" appealable....???

Think
_________________
The Shadowy Group, bringing

you the.... BEST... In



BEAVER PRODUCTS

For over 200 Years...!!!

~~~~~

Our Motto: We DO give a dam!!!

Opinions posted on Free Dominion are those of the individual posters and are not necessarily the opinion of Free Dominion or its operators. Free Dominion does not advocate violence, hate speech or an overthrow of the government.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
RedDog
Avatar

Location: High Plains
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Further, can Lemire, and for that matter the Fourniers immediately initiate action against Warman to recover legal expenses?
_________________
MORE ALBERTA. Less Ottawa.
Opinions expressed by RedDog on Free Dominion are those of RedDog alone and are in no way intended to represent the views of Free Dominion, its principals or moderators.
"If it wasn''t for pizza and other fine Italian foods there would be no happiness" John Goodman
Back to top
View user's profile 
fourhorses
PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



Fire
Them
All

Close their doors

Open their files

Hold those responsible, accountable for their actions.

Compensate those unjustly persecuted.



_________________
Freedom really does not evolve, it revolts.

Today`s rebel is a conservative and fiscal responsibility has become the new counterculture!
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineMaikeru
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Total posts: 4880
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gerry T. Neal wrote:
Maikeru wrote:
One wonders whether Harry himself won't make an application to dismiss for the same reasons.
Judging from his last post over at Jay's blog, I doubt it. He seems to be interpreting the decision differently than most of us are. But I suppose only time and Harry himself will tell.
By now, Harry should know that time wounds all heels...
_________________
“There were not six million Jews murdered; there was one murder, six million times.— Holocaust survivor Abel Herzberg
"Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like." - Chesterton -
Back to top
View user's profile 
styky
PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's Rob Breakenridge Response.... http://www.am770chqr.com/Blogs/RobBreakenridge/BlogEntry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10049186
_________________
FREE DOMINION FORUM RULES
All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom; justice; honor; duty; mercy; hope ~ Sir Winston Churchill
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people''''s money." Margaret Thatcher
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineDrWright
Avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Total posts: 2495
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It sounds all the while that Warman's lawsuit is circling the drain in respect to them


Lets hope so
Mad


_________________
re thought police, witch hunts & the Charter.

http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/?p=855

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

a) freedom of conscience and religion; b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and d) freedom of association.

Are you in violation CHRC commies?
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineJ.B. Stone
Avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2003
Total posts: 42064
Location: Northwest Montana
Age: 61
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RedDog wrote:
Further, can Lemire, and for that matter the Fourniers immediately initiate action against Warman to recover legal expenses?


Excellent Concept..... Applause
_________________
The Shadowy Group, bringing

you the.... BEST... In



BEAVER PRODUCTS

For over 200 Years...!!!

~~~~~

Our Motto: We DO give a dam!!!

Opinions posted on Free Dominion are those of the individual posters and are not necessarily the opinion of Free Dominion or its operators. Free Dominion does not advocate violence, hate speech or an overthrow of the government.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
OfflineNarrow Back
Avatar

Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Total posts: 2588
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One thing I came away after reading the decision is that Warman handled this in an unprofessional and incompetent way. He also made his assistant/trainee look pretty foolish too.
_________________
I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
John Diefenbaker (From the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.)
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineJ.B. Stone
Avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2003
Total posts: 42064
Location: Northwest Montana
Age: 61
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 09/ 02/ 09 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Narrow Back wrote:
One thing I came away after reading the decision is that Warman handled this in an unprofessional and incompetent way. He also made his assistant/trainee look pretty foolish too.


Incompetence ALWAYS flows downhill......!!!!

Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Display posts from previous:   
 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexCensorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack


 

 The Official Live Warman vs Lemire CHRT Decision Thread Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 Page 3 of 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
  Home ∴  Forum ∴  Recent ∴  FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in



Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs topic RSS feed 
Google Sitemap Generator
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group