The time now is 02/ 08/ 10 10:00 pm 
Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum Index
Home  ∴ Forum  ∴ Recent  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in
FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Donate ∴  Activist's Toolbox ∴  FD Links ∴  FD Swag  

[ Login to join chat ]  FD Arcade - Click Here-->    
   

Doomed Canadian
Edward Kennedy
CRU Documents
Warman's Latest Trick
C2C Journal
 Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2  Next Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  

 

 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexReligion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OfflineStephenBoissoin
Avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Total posts: 379
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Age: 42
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 9:21 am    Post subject: Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court Reply with quote

We are heading to court On Sept 16th. Many Canadians have supported our freedom by contributing to my legal defence over the last seven years. The outcome of this case is very important for Canadians at large.

You can read the legal brief prepared by my attorney Gerald D. Chipeur Q.C. of Miller Thomson LLP at the link below.

http://stephenboissoin.com/downloads/scan002_20090715_164508.pdf

I owe many a great deal of gratitude for getting us this far.

Blessings,

Stephen Boissoin
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
OnlineMark Fournier
Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 15060
Location: Kingston, ON
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for your dedication to the freedom of all Canadians, Mr. Boissoin. Those who would take away our freedom will always be among us so we fight an eternal battle, but fight we must.
_________________
"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you. If you are willing to use violence to impose your ideas on your fellow man, you are a menace to society." - Entropy Squared
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
OfflineNarrow Back
Avatar

Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Total posts: 2106
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 9:37 am    Post subject: Re: Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court Reply with quote

StephenBoissoin wrote:
We are heading to court On Sept 16th. Many Canadians have supported our freedom by contributing to my legal defence over the last seven years. The outcome of this case is very important for Canadians at large.

You can read the legal brief prepared by my attorney Gerald D. Chipeur Q.C. of Miller Thomson LLP at the link below.

http://stephenboissoin.com/downloads/scan002_20090715_164508.pdf

I owe many a great deal of gratitude for getting us this far.

Blessings,

Stephen Boissoin


Hi Stephen,

I wish you all the best in this very important case.


Would you mind commenting on this? It's from an FD thread about Harry Abrams where your name is mentioned and Abrams replies:

Harry Abrams wrote:


If I remember correctly, that Pastor, if that's what he was, wrote some
pretty nasty stuff that specifically inspired someone to commit a
hatefully violent act. Unfortunately, this wasn't the first nor will it be
the last time that religious scripture is selectively and fanatically
quoted and/or misinterpreted in a way that justifies harm in the mind of
the perpetrator, anyway.

The Charter says we have the right to speak our views subject to reasonable
constraints in a democratic society.

In any case, to me, religious leaders who incite hatred or violence make
poor role models.

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121039&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15



Do you think comments like this impact your chances of a fair trial? Given Mr. Abrams standing in the "pro section 13.1" crowd I would think the answer is yes.
_________________
I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
John Diefenbaker (From the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.)
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineStephenBoissoin
Avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Total posts: 379
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Age: 42
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My opinion is that Mr. Abrams has most likely never read my letter nor investigated my case or any other opinion of mine.

1. I was an ordained and licensed Minister able to perform all duties including those requiring Provincial license.

2. Nowhere in my 2002 letter did I advocate violence at anytime. Through my lifestyle, ministry, volunteer position with the RCMP etc, it was clear that I did not advocate violence against any people group. By the grace of God, He has used me to impacts thousands of young lives.

3. My Legal brief clearly addressed the fallacious accusation that I had anything to do with a supposed assualt which by the way was never investigated by the Police nor was any witness made available at my Human Rights hearing to provide proof of this crime or its link to my letter. This is addressed clearly in the brief and will be addressed in court.

I would speculate that Mr. Abrams is pro-gay, that he has not investigated my case or me and yet still spews his opinions as if he has because that is what people like him do.

Regards,

Stephen Boissoin
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
OfflineNarrow Back
Avatar

Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Total posts: 2106
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

StephenBoissoin wrote:
My opinion is that Mr. Abrams has most likely never read my letter nor investigated my case or any other opinion of mine.

1. I was an ordained and licensed Minister able to perform all duties including those requiring Provincial license.

2. Nowhere in my 2002 letter did I advocate violence at anytime. Through my lifestyle, ministry, volunteer position with the RCMP etc, it was clear that I did not advocate violence against any people group. By the grace of God, He has used me to impacts thousands of young lives.

3. My Legal brief clearly addressed the fallacious accusation that I had anything to do with a supposed assualt which by the way was never investigated by the Police nor was any witness made available at my Human Rights hearing to provide proof of this crime or its link to my letter. This is addressed clearly in the brief and will be addressed in court.

I would speculate that Mr. Abrams is pro-gay, that he has not investigated my case or me and yet still spews his opinions as if he has because that is what people like him do.

Regards,

Stephen Boissoin


Thank you Stephen.

See Harry, that wasn't so hard was it? You just have to ask. But I guess throwing around damning innuendo is more favorable to people like you though. What disgraceful behavior.
_________________
I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
John Diefenbaker (From the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.)
Back to top
View user's profile 
OnlineMark Fournier
Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 15060
Location: Kingston, ON
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Look at every one of these CHRC cases (or their provincial counterparts) and you see a steady stream of lies, deceits and manipulations of the facts by one side and one side only. That side is invariably the HRCs and their supporters.

If these human rights commissions and their enabling legislation were legitimate there would be no need for them to be constantly lying. Of course they have already admitted that the truth has no bearing in what they do so it should not be surprising that it has no bearing on what they say.
_________________
"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you. If you are willing to use violence to impose your ideas on your fellow man, you are a menace to society." - Entropy Squared
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
fourhorses
PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BUMP

read the legal brief
_________________
Freedom really does not evolve, it revolts.

Today`s rebel is a conservative and fiscal responsibility has become the new counterculture!
Back to top
View user's profile 
OnlineMark Fournier
Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 15060
Location: Kingston, ON
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 07/ 23/ 09 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Harry Abrams responds:

From: Harry Abrams habrams@pacificcoast.net
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:14:08 -0700
To: connie@freedominion.ca
Subject: Boisson


Connie,
I just received a copy of the original Boisson decision, which I had never
seen before, and which I'll be studying today. I'd appreciate it if you
posted it on this thread so everybody else can see it too.

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121136

I also would like to express that I responded extemporaneously to a
question on another thread about the Boisson matter with an opinion
based on something that I'd read some time ago and did not specifically
check before answering. Also I prefaced my personal response with the phrase:

"...If I remember correctly..."

and before I was aware of an appeal.


H.

_________________________________________________________

So now that you know the truth, Harry, will you stop repeating the lies about Stephen Boissoin?
_________________
"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you. If you are willing to use violence to impose your ideas on your fellow man, you are a menace to society." - Entropy Squared
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
OfflinePeter O'Donnell
Avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Total posts: 7995
Location: BC
Age: 60
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 07/ 24/ 09 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

An important case which could help to establish the supremacy of traditional law over the arbitrary rules of quasi-legal structures that in essence form an extension of academic groupthink (as in, this is what you must think to graduate).

We have already graduated, and are not looking for a third degree.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Tory_canuck
Avatar

Location: Red Deer, AB
Age: 23
Gender: Female

PostPosted: 07/ 24/ 09 3:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

StephenBoissoin wrote:
My opinion is that Mr. Abrams has most likely never read my letter nor investigated my case or any other opinion of mine.

1. I was an ordained and licensed Minister able to perform all duties including those requiring Provincial license.

2. Nowhere in my 2002 letter did I advocate violence at anytime. Through my lifestyle, ministry, volunteer position with the RCMP etc, it was clear that I did not advocate violence against any people group. By the grace of God, He has used me to impacts thousands of young lives.

3. My Legal brief clearly addressed the fallacious accusation that I had anything to do with a supposed assualt which by the way was never investigated by the Police nor was any witness made available at my Human Rights hearing to provide proof of this crime or its link to my letter. This is addressed clearly in the brief and will be addressed in court.

I would speculate that Mr. Abrams is pro-gay, that he has not investigated my case or me and yet still spews his opinions as if he has because that is what people like him do.

Regards,

Stephen Boissoin



I wish you luck...btw.....I can be found some days working at the superstore here in Red Deer
_________________




Waffle House: Because it's 2 a.m., and there's still enough time to make another bad decision. Pancakebunny
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Tory_canuck
Avatar

Location: Red Deer, AB
Age: 23
Gender: Female

PostPosted: 07/ 24/ 09 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tory_canuck wrote:
StephenBoissoin wrote:
My opinion is that Mr. Abrams has most likely never read my letter nor investigated my case or any other opinion of mine.

1. I was an ordained and licensed Minister able to perform all duties including those requiring Provincial license.

2. Nowhere in my 2002 letter did I advocate violence at anytime. Through my lifestyle, ministry, volunteer position with the RCMP etc, it was clear that I did not advocate violence against any people group. By the grace of God, He has used me to impacts thousands of young lives.

3. My Legal brief clearly addressed the fallacious accusation that I had anything to do with a supposed assualt which by the way was never investigated by the Police nor was any witness made available at my Human Rights hearing to provide proof of this crime or its link to my letter. This is addressed clearly in the brief and will be addressed in court.

I would speculate that Mr. Abrams is pro-gay, that he has not investigated my case or me and yet still spews his opinions as if he has because that is what people like him do.

Regards,

Stephen Boissoin



I wish you luck...btw.....I can be found some days working at the superstore here in Red Deer


I meant I wish you luck with your case Mr.Bosisson...sorry...quoted the wrong post. Embarassed
_________________




Waffle House: Because it's 2 a.m., and there's still enough time to make another bad decision. Pancakebunny
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Offlinefree_life2
Avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Total posts: 7506

PostPosted: 07/ 24/ 09 1:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court Reply with quote

StephenBoissoin wrote:
We are heading to court On Sept 16th. Many Canadians have supported our freedom by contributing to my legal defence over the last seven years. The outcome of this case is very important for Canadians at large.

You can read the legal brief prepared by my attorney Gerald D. Chipeur Q.C. of Miller Thomson LLP at the link below.

http://stephenboissoin.com/downloads/scan002_20090715_164508.pdf

I owe many a great deal of gratitude for getting us this far.

Blessings,

Stephen Boissoin


Good legal brief Stephen and breath of fresh air in the stifling atmosphere of present day Canada. I have followed your case persecution with great interest. May you have total success, I will continue to pray for this, for all our sakes.

When have Canadians ever given any government the authority to take away our right to free speech? The government has never owned this right nor the right to parcel it out to whom 'they' choose, we the people of Canada own this right.
_________________
.
.
.
.
.
Pray this prayer.
Jesus I believe You died for my sins and were raised from the dead 3 days later. Forgive me and save me. Jesus be my Lord and Saviour. Help me to follow You from this day forward. Thank You God. Amen.

.
.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineVlad the Impaler
Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Total posts: 374
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 07/ 25/ 09 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To say this is an important case is an understatement. We will see if the real courts will be willing to uphold the validity of the kangaroo court of Alberta. If they do, Lord help us all. Of course our political leadership has the power to legislate, but sadly we all know where the Stelmach government stands on persecuting Christians.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineNarrow Back
Avatar

Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Total posts: 2106
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 07/ 25/ 09 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mark Fournier wrote:
Harry Abrams responds:

From: Harry Abrams habrams@pacificcoast.net
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:14:08 -0700
To: connie@freedominion.ca
Subject: Boisson


Connie,
I just received a copy of the original Boisson decision, which I had never
seen before, and which I'll be studying today. I'd appreciate it if you
posted it on this thread so everybody else can see it too.

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121136

I also would like to express that I responded extemporaneously to a
question on another thread about the Boisson matter with an opinion
based on something that I'd read some time ago and did not specifically
check before answering. Also I prefaced my personal response with the phrase:

"...If I remember correctly..."

and before I was aware of an appeal.


H.

_________________________________________________________

So now that you know the truth, Harry, will you stop repeating the lies about Stephen Boissoin?


Laughing This guy is so predictable. "...If I remember correctly..." Weasel words.

In my opinion Harry Abrams has prejudiced this case. This is especially damaging in that Abrams is, for reasons I do not understand, respected by the supporters of Section 13.1. And he did not apologize for his comments either. All he ever offers is bafflegab.
_________________
I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
John Diefenbaker (From the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.)
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflinePadraigh
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Total posts: 171
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 07/ 25/ 09 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I remember correctly, Harry Abrams killed a man in Reno just to watch him die.


Wow, I love these 4 words, they completely obsolve me of whatever I say after it according to Harry.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
Display posts from previous:   
 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexReligion Forum


 

 Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2  Next Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
  Home ∴  Forum ∴  Recent ∴  FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in



Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs topic RSS feed 
Google Sitemap Generator
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group