God Bless President Bush

For discussion of news and events from http://www.canadiansforbush.org.

Postby Monorprise » 10/ 17/ 06 4:00 am

tothechase wrote:well put-- I've always liked President Bush.--- 1 and 2.

The pressure he is under must be crushing--- which is manageable, but the insulting so called humor and hate toward him in face of the situation in the world must really hurt.

God Bless the man, President Bush.

I was too young to really know much about 1 I remember him, sadly I don’t remember Ronald region, as I was only 4 when he left office.

To be honest I’m mixed on his father in Hine site, I think his father had assume really bad policy's partially on immigration, which negated the need for assimilation, by removing Country quotas.

Although we would defiantly have been better off partially in regards to North Korea had he not lost to Clinton.
Who basically paid North Korea off, with our tax dollars and stop all intelligences estimates apparently because he didn’t want to know whether they were actually keeping to their agreements(never did).
It would have been better to let their regent collapse while they were still far enough from a real nuke or more serous weapon and we still had a huge military to beat them down, and nonthing else we had to be doing with it at the moment.
It would have saved money and Millions of North Koreans life’s and suffering from the yoke of their incompetent communist dictatorship being maintained.
It was as with most things in the Clinton administration a stupid and corrupt deal but classic Clinton as to try and get them problems off the front page to avoid having to deal with any of them, and instead just put them off.

Bush 41’s had his faults but it would have been much better for the sake of freedom and prosperity that he had remained to deal with that, responsibility, then when we could have relatively more easily, and really helped clean up and end the cold war’s remnants.
Theses are things I learned thou research after the fact, I don’t remember much beyond that as I was very young and didn’t start really paying attention to this until about the 2000 election recount thing, when I learned of Bush 43.

Although I do remember the first golf war, when I mistakenly though it was in the Golf of Mexico, until corrected by my father, as I we sometimes we referred to it simply as “the golf” which was, near where I lived at the time in back in Texas.
I was trying to figure out where the U.S. Aircraft carrier could be that they were reporting on TV to be “Somewhere in the gulf.”
lol
Freedom is worth defending whatever the cost!!
User avatar
Monorprise
 
Posts: 2688
Joined: 03/ 08/ 04 2:05 am
Location: New Mexico a United State

Postby Roy Wilson » 10/ 21/ 06 2:07 pm

Transcript: President Bush's Radio Address

Saturday , October 21, 2006


Good morning. Earlier this week, I spoke with Prime Minister Maliki of Iraq. We discussed the recent increase in violence in his country. Attacks have grown significantly during the first weeks of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

There are a number of reasons for this increase in violence. One reason is that Coalition and Iraqi forces have been conducting focused operations to bring security to Baghdad. Side by side, Iraqi and American forces are operating in the city's most violent areas to disrupt Al Qaeda, capture enemy fighters, crack down on IED makers, and break up death squads.

As we engage our enemies in their stronghold, these enemies are putting up a tough fight. In a briefing in Iraq on Thursday, General William Caldwell said the operation to secure Baghdad has "not met our overall expectations." He also explained, "It's no coincidence that the surge in attacks against coalition forces coincides with our increased presence in the streets in Baghdad."

Our goal in Iraq is clear and unchanging: Our goal is victory. What is changing are the tactics we use to achieve that goal. Our commanders on the ground are constantly adjusting their approach to stay ahead of the enemy, particularly in Baghdad.

General Pete Pace, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, recently put it this way: "From a military standpoint, every day is a reassessment day." We have a strategy that allows us to be flexible and to adapt to changing circumstances. We've changed the way we train the Iraqi security forces. We have changed the way we deliver reconstruction assistance in areas that have been cleared of terrorist influence. And we will continue to be flexible, and make every necessary change to prevail in this struggle.

Iraq's new leaders are beginning to take the difficult steps necessary to defeat the terrorists and unite their country. The Prime Minister recently met with tribal leaders from Anbar Province, who told him they are ready to stand up and fight the terrorists. He's also taken action to clean up the Iraqi national police.

His government suspended a national police unit after allegations that some of its members were linked to militias and death squads. A battalion commander was arrested for possible complicity in sectarian deaths. And earlier this week, two of Iraq's most senior police commanders were reassigned as part of a major restructuring of the national police force.

Another reason for the recent increase in attacks is that the terrorists are trying to influence public opinion here in the United States. They have a sophisticated propaganda strategy. They know they cannot defeat us in the battle, so they conduct high-profile attacks, hoping that the images of violence will demoralize our country and force us to retreat. They carry video cameras and film their atrocities, and broadcast them on the Internet. They e-mail images and video clips to Middle Eastern cable networks like al-Jazeera, and instruct their followers to send the same material to American journalists, authors, and opinion leaders. They operate websites, where they post messages for their followers and readers across the world.

In one recent message, the Global Islamic Media Front — a group that often posts al Qaeda propaganda on websites — said their goal is to, "carry out a media war that is parallel to the military war." This is the same strategy the terrorists launched in Afghanistan following 9/11. In a letter to the Taliban leader Mullah Omar, Osama bin Laden wrote that Al Qaeda intended to wage "a media campaign, to create a wedge between the American people and their government."

The terrorists are trying to divide America and break our will, and we must not allow them to succeed. So America will stand with the democratic government of Iraq. We will help Prime Minister Maliki build a free nation that can govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself. And we will help Iraq become a strong democracy that is a strong ally in the war on terror.

There is one thing we will not do: We will not pull our troops off the battlefield before the mission is complete. There are some in Washington who argue that retreating from Iraq would make us safer. I disagree. Retreating from Iraq would allow the terrorists to gain a new safe haven from which to launch new attacks on America. Retreating from Iraq would dishonor the men and women who have given their lives in that country, and mean their sacrifice has been in vain. And retreating from Iraq would embolden the terrorists, and make our country, our friends, and our allies more vulnerable to new attacks.

The last few weeks have been rough for our troops in Iraq, and for the Iraqi people. The fighting is difficult, but our Nation has seen difficult fights before. In World War II and the Cold War, earlier generations of Americans sacrificed so that we can live in freedom. This generation will do its duty as well. We will defeat the terrorists everywhere they make their stand, and we will leave a more hopeful world for our children and our grandchildren.

Thank you for listening.
SUPPORT THE TROOPS THEY KEEP YOU FREE. SUPPORT FARMERS, THEY FEED YOU.

ImageSUPPORT ISRAEL

Image
User avatar
Roy Wilson
 
Posts: 27723
Joined: 04/ 04/ 04 12:53 pm
Location: Peterborough

Postby tothechase » 10/ 21/ 06 4:09 pm

Being a hate filled nut job doesn't make you stupid---they are focusing on THE most important area---public sentiment, propaganda=through the media.

The libs have been dominate in this game from the beginning.
The Conservatives are holding there nose, trying to get there. its going to be a long battle-- 3 steps forward--2 steps back kinda thing.


Conservatives should never vote for a left wing party to make a point against a right wing party.


try and look at the big picture--- the details will fall into place in there right time.

me thinks :)
http://www.jesusclips.com/view_video.ph ... ca1b52d373

Ephesians 2 (KJV)
8- For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9- Not of works, lest any man should boast.

James 2 (NIV)
18- But someone will say, "You have faith; I have deeds."
Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.
19- You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.
User avatar
tothechase
 
Posts: 1692
Joined: 06/ 14/ 06 8:32 am

Postby moufflon » 10/ 21/ 06 8:35 pm

I heard that the REPUBLICANS in the US have been caught with their "pants down" as far as the evangelicals are concerned - someone reported that behind doors evangelicals are mocked & cynically used by the US administration... I am trying to verify this .. heard about it on PBS - the program where Pat Buchannan & others debate issues (forgot the name of the program & the moderator)
User avatar
moufflon
 
Posts: 214
Joined: 11/ 04/ 05 10:58 pm
Location: Montréal

Postby ccrb » 10/ 21/ 06 8:47 pm

I heard that the REPUBLICANS in the US have been caught with their "pants down" as far as the evangelicals are concerned - someone reported that behind doors evangelicals are mocked & cynically used by the US administration...


uh. This is October, and that was just another October Suprise courtesy of our left wing media. They're doing what they can to discourage evangelicals from voting this fall. It's nothing more than a repeat of the grade school conversation "Georgie says you're stoooopid".

This happened in other election year. The story that broke about his drunk driving was incorrect and irrelevant, but it was released just a day or two before the election. Again, to discourage and dishearten evangelicals.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Whether the evangelicals get offended by the fact the Foley (apparrently did NOT) have sex with a page under legal age... or whether they get offended because someone said evangelicals were loopy - it remains to be seen.

Maybe the saying will become, Fool me four times, shame on me.

But the Christians I know are not being taken in by these October surprises.
User avatar
ccrb
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: 11/ 26/ 04 2:50 pm

Postby ccrb » 10/ 21/ 06 8:48 pm

And by the way, the media has NO CLUE what goes on in the minds of evangelicals - we're all aliens in their eyes, just like the amish
User avatar
ccrb
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: 11/ 26/ 04 2:50 pm

Postby Caper29b » 10/ 21/ 06 9:40 pm

moufflon wrote:I heard that the REPUBLICANS in the US have been caught with their "pants down" as far as the evangelicals are concerned - someone reported that behind doors evangelicals are mocked & cynically used by the US administration... I am trying to verify this .. heard about it on PBS - the program where Pat Buchannan & others debate issues (forgot the name of the program & the moderator)


The guy's name is David Kuo and the program was 60 minutes on CBS.

The fact that 60 minutes and CBS is pushing his new book says it all and doesn't merit any further comment. :roll:
"Since you have chosen to elect a man with a timber toe to succeed me, you may all go to hell and I will go to Texas." Davy Crockett

"Well, I could have stayed to take the Dole, but I'm not one of those.
I take nothing free, and that makes me an idiot, I suppose."
Stan Rogers :angel: The Idiot
User avatar
Caper29b
 
Posts: 930
Joined: 01/ 11/ 06 10:11 pm
Location: New Yawk

Postby Caper29b » 10/ 21/ 06 9:48 pm

ccrb wrote:And by the way, the media has NO CLUE what goes on in the minds of evangelicals - we're all aliens in their eyes, just like the amish


In the David Kuo interview on 60 minutes he actually has the nerve to say that Christians should step back and take a break from politics for awhile. :shake: Hmmmm isn't that funny. That's what the democrats want Christians to do as well. :roll:
"Since you have chosen to elect a man with a timber toe to succeed me, you may all go to hell and I will go to Texas." Davy Crockett

"Well, I could have stayed to take the Dole, but I'm not one of those.
I take nothing free, and that makes me an idiot, I suppose."
Stan Rogers :angel: The Idiot
User avatar
Caper29b
 
Posts: 930
Joined: 01/ 11/ 06 10:11 pm
Location: New Yawk

Postby ccrb » 10/ 22/ 06 9:18 pm

I just love it when some agnostic moron presumes to tell me it's more spiritual to sit this one out...
User avatar
ccrb
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: 11/ 26/ 04 2:50 pm

Postby Caper29b » 10/ 22/ 06 9:43 pm

ccrb wrote:I just love it when some agnostic moron presumes to tell me it's more spiritual to sit this one out...


I don't know if you would call Kuo an agnostic. He was the former number two in Bush's Faith Based Initiative.

That said. I believe you'll see him come out as the head of some Christian Democrat group in the near future based on some of the crap he was saying during the 60 minute interview.

You can watch the interview here. That's if you haven't eaten yet. Since it will want to make your diner come up. :)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/ ... 9778.shtml
"Since you have chosen to elect a man with a timber toe to succeed me, you may all go to hell and I will go to Texas." Davy Crockett

"Well, I could have stayed to take the Dole, but I'm not one of those.
I take nothing free, and that makes me an idiot, I suppose."
Stan Rogers :angel: The Idiot
User avatar
Caper29b
 
Posts: 930
Joined: 01/ 11/ 06 10:11 pm
Location: New Yawk

Postby Faramir » 10/ 24/ 06 12:55 am

Roy Wilson, thanks for the post. I have no doubt that that is exactly what the insurgents are counting on. What many miss is that a good number of these people we are fighting are NOT Iraqis. They are Syrians, Saudis, Iranians, ect.... The enemy sees Iraq as the battleground to test our resolve. I could care a rat's ass about democracy building in Iraq. If we have to partion, heck, let's do that.

BTW, the claim of 600,000 dead Iraqis has been proven to be an outright fabrication. It's more like 60,000.
CPC: Censorship Party of Canada
User avatar
Faramir
 
Posts: 19899
Joined: 12/ 01/ 04 11:19 pm
Location: Victoria, House of War

Postby Chocolate Tennis Balls » 10/ 24/ 06 2:38 am

How about a new strategy, like the following: The U.S. announces that it is withdrawing from Iraq, and leaves. The Islamofascists will celebrate in the streets of Baghdad, and thump their chests, fire their AK47's into the air etc... Then, just at the height of their celebrations, the U.S. does a surprise nuke attack of Baghdad.
Chocolate Tennis Balls
 
Posts: 2221
Joined: 04/ 16/ 05 10:07 pm
Location: Niagara Falls

Postby fourhorses » 04/ 10/ 07 9:11 pm

Chocolate Tennis Balls wrote:How about a new strategy, like the following: The U.S. announces that it is withdrawing from Iraq, and leaves. The Islamofascists will celebrate in the streets of Baghdad, and thump their chests, fire their AK47's into the air etc... Then, just at the height of their celebrations, the U.S. does a surprise nuke attack of Baghdad.


Monday, April 02, 2007

The Ugly Anti-American

When I hear all the Anti-American venom in the world, when I hear that people blame Bush because the leaders of Iran are delusional, psychopathic killers and have kidnapped some limeys, when I hear that the majority in Eurotrash idiot-pits like Germany and France think that the US is more dangerous than Iran, I want the Americans to go home.

Now let me explain. I don't want the Americans to go home because they've done anything wrong. In fact, by supporting the capitalist model, they've done enough.

I want the Americans to go home so that the rest of the world will have no other choice but to grow the f-word up!!! The ROTW (rest of the world) have been turned into pathetic, cowardly, unmanned eunuchs too afraid to assert their own cultures and too reliant on the US to protect them. We've been turned into amoral children unable to see what kind of responsibilities that the adults have to deal with.

I don't mean that the US should go home from Iraq only. I mean from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Europe and every other place on the planet kept free by the blood, treasure and sacrifice of the world's most benevolent superpower. These places listed above (as well as every other place including here in Canada,) have been kept safe despite their unworthiness to be protected.

The US has suffered protests and insults about the military presence in these countries by the very ungrateful peons that the US has protected since they joined WWII (late - so much for the warmonger label!) and yet US military personnel continue to die for the rights of little ingrate Huns and Frogs and other Eurowennie Appeasers to denigrate their protectors.

If I was the US president, I'd be flipping you all the bird and telling you to enjoy your impending slavery. I'd be telling you ingrate assholes that you are not worthy of protecting and that it is no longer worth a single further US life to protect you.

I would also disband the UN and expel all personnel from US soil and then dismantle the buildings so that none of the stink of corruption remains.

I want the rest of the world to suffer what the absence of the US would inevitably bring so that the vermin of the world can understand what the US has sacrificed for their ungrateful asses.

Let the Muslim civil war in Europe begin in earnest. I look forward to the Eurocowards trying to surrender to people who won't take prisoners. I don't look forward to the burning of the Louvre. It's unfortunate that such shameful and unworthy people have inherited so much of the western world's cultural wealth (before all of Europe's best and brightest left for the new world.)

The barbarians aren't at the gates as the gates have been left open. The barbarians are already raping and pillaging while the Eurotrash cower. Get used to being the slaves and bitches of people who don't hide behind "international" law but instead work with the laws of human nature. Islamofascism may be evil and cruel but it at least has the cultural confidence to insist on its own survival. What does Europe have?

I would then put the world on notice that the US is not to be messed with in any way. Any nation that tries to harm the US or US interests will be bombed to rubble in a way not seen since Japan circa 1945. No "smart bombs." No surgical strikes. Utter destruction. It's a simple message that everyone can understand: mess with the US and die. Leave the US alone and live. Even "red" Ken Livingston and "Lawrence of Arabia's retarded cousin" Galloway can understand a message that simple.

What sets this plan apart from the reality is that the US would never abandon the world - they have too much honour and they respect their responsibilities as the only sane world power. The US would never let the world down. Sure, they make mistakes. But unlike the malicious, lying, vermin propagandists of the world (and I include the treasonous media in this category as much as the islamofascists) the US always means well. They truly believe that given the chance, most people will choose to live peacefully while trying to provide for their families. This is their cardinal virtue and their worst folly. People are vermin. We can thank the naivety of the US that they haven't figured it out yet for our continuing existence.

If you are one of the anti-American retards of which I speak: you shame your forbearers and your country's history. You shame your families and your friends and your communities. You're too pathetic to live. Go and die a slave. Go and die on your knees.


http://warwicknews.blogspot.com/2007/04 ... rican.html
User avatar
fourhorses
 
Posts: 23902
Joined: 01/ 23/ 06 9:23 pm

Postby Ipberg2 » 04/ 10/ 07 9:36 pm

In January 2009 someone else will inherit a much tougher situation as president than Bush encountered back in January 2001. And for two months after September 11, 2001 President Bush had a 60%+ approval rating among Americans and respect around the world. I see a lot of political capital and financial capital squandered by President Bush in the build up to the Iraq War and during the Occupation since declaring Mission Accomplished on May 1, 2003. The next decade will be spent by other presidents, Republican or Democrat, repairing the damage.
Ipberg2
 
Posts: 10550
Joined: 11/ 17/ 05 9:22 pm

Postby Vigilance » 04/ 10/ 07 9:52 pm

CultureWarrior wrote:
Chocolate Tennis Balls wrote:He's had good intentions, but whats' he actually accomplished in 6 years besides racking up a huge government debt, and toppling a couple of two-bit dictatorships?


The man liberated 50 million people and chased the butcher of Baghdad into a spider hole... What have you accomplished over the past 6 years?


Yet, Iraq is on the verge of civil war, and the country is in a state of confusion and disarray. I'm not saying, however, that the liberation of the country is a bad thing. I remain silent and reserved on my opinions of Mr. Bush. I'm not sure what to think right now.
Vigilance
 
Posts: 1213
Joined: 12/ 07/ 05 8:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC

PreviousNext

Return to Canadians for Bush

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests