View topic - Alberta Christian Pastor Hauled Before Human Rights Tribunal :: Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics

Posted: 09/ 20/ 05 8:36 pm Post subject:

leewgrant wrote:

Posted: 09/ 20/ 05 8:40 pm Post subject:

Posted: 09/ 20/ 05 8:52 pm Post subject:

Here is my copy and paste from the intellectual wanna be’s , Real women. Very Happy

http://www.realwomenca.com/newsletter/2000_May_Jun/article_7.html

"Hate" Crime Against Catholic Church
A group of feminists, calling themselves the "Collectif Autonome Feministe," were in Phillips Square in Montreal to protest their supposed oppression by the patriarchy. Following their protest, they donned ski masks and launched an assault on nearby Mary Queen of the World Catholic Cathedral. They spray-painted on the church, "Religion - A Trap for Fools," and erected a burning cross outside. Inside, they disrupted worshippers by spray-painting slogans on the altar, overturning flower pots, sticking used sanitary napkins on pictures and walls, and throwing condoms around the sanctuary ¯ while screaming in foul language their opposition to religion and claiming the right to abortion and freedom of speech. Since Quebec has the highest abortion rate in the Western world, their protests seem to come from somewhere in the Twilight Zone!
What is particularly striking about their ugly demonstration, however, is the reaction to it by police and the media.
The Police
The gallant Montreal police did not lay charges of hatred against an identifiable group (Catholics) as explicitly set out in S.318 of the Criminal Code. Instead, the police laid a single charge of "unlawful assembly" against seven of the demonstrators ¯ a charge for which it is notoriously difficult to obtain a conviction. Other possible offenses such as disrupting a clergyman in the performance of his duties; interrupting persons assembled for religious worship; nuisance; mischief to property; and theft (they stole two altar cloths) - appeared not to be "appropriate" according to the police. When questioned about why more obvious charges, such as inciting hatred, were not laid, a police spokesperson replied that there was no evidence of a "hate" crime here but merely a political statement (made by the ski-masked intruders!)
Concordia history professor Graeme Decarie supported the police in this astonishing conclusion with the trenchant thought that unlike attacks on synagogues and mosques, this attack was motivated by serious "policy" differences. We see. Hate crimes are truly special, and they only become "hateful" when the attacks are made on favoured, protected identifiable groups - attacks on all other groups are not "hateful."
The Media
Equally astonishing was the reaction of the media to this vile event. The only newspapers to cover it were the National Post., the Sarnia Observer and the Guelph Mercury. The Montreal Gazette, only a stone's throw away from the church (or, as noted by National Post columnist, Mark Steyn, "…only a sanitary napkin's throw away from the church"), made a brief reference to this event only on the back page of the newspaper. The article was nestled in between the classified ads for call girls, escort services and massages. This gives some indication as to how very unimportant this incident was to the editors of the Montreal Gazette.
In an editorial in the National Post on March 9th, entitled "Where is the Outrage?":
Imagine the reaction if a Jewish synagogue in Toronto was attacked by an anti-Semitic-mob, shouting insults and ripping up prayer books. Imagine if members of the Ku Klux Klan were to burn a cross on the front lawn of a black church in Halifax. The result takes little guessing ¯ these hateful acts would dominate the national media for days, and politicians would be denouncing the perpetrators.
Not only would the police charge those involved with everything from trespass to arson, to vandalism to spreading hatred against identifiable groups, but federal and provincial human rights commissions would slap the offenders with civil actions as well. The CBC's public soul-searching would be mind-numbing.
Well, it happened in Montreal ¯ but instead of a Jewish synagogue or a black church, it was a Catholic church that was attacked, robbed, vandalized and desecrated with a burning cross.
… Anti-Christian hostility is one of the last acceptable bigotries in Canada.
… Whenever such examples are cited to justify the charge of a double standard penalizing Christian groups, eyebrows are raised and shoulders politely shrugged. But we would never accept an attack on other religious groups and we should not remain silent when Catholics are the targets of intolerance.
Have we, as a nation, come to this: hypocrisy and blatant intolerance for the Christian faith?

Particularly alarming is the complacence of our legal system and the media to these attacks on the Christian faith in Canada. Human Rights Commissions repeatedly disparage Christian beliefs, as do our courts (such as in the Surrey School Board case). Much of the media fails to express any concern about these attacks on Christians. When the legal and social structures of society tolerate these attacks, it is not unreasonable to assume that Christians in Canada today are becoming genuine victims.
Hedy Fry is in need of "sensitivity" training - to make her sensitive to the attacks on all Canadians, including Christians.
_________________
Did you pray for Roy today? Pray

http://tiny.cc/Gz84b
`There is nothing more beautiful than to be surprised by the Gospel, by the encounter with Christ. There is nothing more beautiful than to know Him and to speak to others of our friendship with him.” Pope Benedict XV

Posted: 09/ 20/ 05 10:08 pm Post subject:

Posted: 09/ 20/ 05 11:11 pm Post subject:

Posted: 09/ 20/ 05 11:24 pm Post subject: Re: Wake Up!!!

CHRISTIAN MEETING ATTACKED BY GAY MILITIA
CALGARY POLICE TO LAY CHARGES
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COMPLAINT TO BE FILED

(Calgary) The Concerned Christian Coalition Inc., (CCC) held it’s national convention in Calgary, Alberta on Saturday, April 17, 2004. At the national convention dinner the Gay Militia stormed the meeting with sticks, angry chants and verbally assaulted the delegates at hand. The dinner was being held in support of Rev. Stephen Boissoin who is currently being dragged before the Alberta Human Rights Commission for defending the Biblical view of homosexuality. Half of all profits were donated to Rev. Stephen Boissoin and fundraising will continue in order to help offset his legal costs. Further, information on Rev. Stephen Boissoin can be found at www.concernedchristians.ca

"I was dumbfounded at the fact that the Gay Militia would storm into a private meeting where we were praying and discussing Bill C-250 a bill that will affect our freedom as Christians to discuss certain beliefs. Just as our guest speaker Rev. Tristan Emmanuel was discussing how Bill C-250 is about silencing our freedom of speech and freedom of assembly the Gay Militia stormed the meeting and proved the point," stated Jim Blake, CCC Business Chair.

The CCC feels that all groups have a right to freedom of speech, freedom of religion and the freedom to assemble and protect their deep held personal and moral beliefs. "We are very concerned about the Christophobia and the growing hatred towards Christians in Canada. We are also very concerned that the media continually ignores the blatantly bigoted actions of the militant minority in this country. Can you imagine if our organization stormed a Homosexual gathering? It would be on the front page of every paper in the country and the headlines would not be flattering towards us," continued Blake.

The Calgary City Police arrived at the event just moments after the Gay Militia was cleared out by hotel security. The Calgary Police Service seized all the videotapes but one and some video footage has been placed on the internet at http://www.justicenetworkcanada.com/justicenetworkcanada.com.rmvb and on the CCC website of www.concernedchristians.ca The Calgary Police Service has assured the CCC that charges will be laid against members of the Gay Militia when they are found. The CCC has cited 3 sections of the Criminal Code that have been breached by the Gay Militia. Those sections are as follows:

175-1 A i Causing A Disturbance - every person who not being in a dwelling house causes a disturbance in or near a public place by fighting, screaming, shouting, swearing, singing or using insulting or obscene language.

176 2 Disturbing a Religious Worship - everyone who willfully disturbs or interrupts and assemblage of persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

265 1 B Assault - A person commits an assault when he attempts or threatens by an act or a gesture to apply force to another person if he has or causes that other person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has present ability to affect his purpose.

Posted: 09/ 21/ 05 12:50 am Post subject:

Heres what I get when I go to http://www.justicenetworkcanada.com/

(domain not registered)
_________________
Qur''an, 9:5 "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."

"I have nothing against Islam because it educates the men in this division for me and promises them
heaven if they fight and are killed in action. A very practical and attractive religion for soldiers."
- Heinrich Himmler (head of Nazi SS troops)

Posted: 09/ 21/ 05 1:00 am Post subject:

Posted: 09/ 21/ 05 7:56 am Post subject:

WatchX4 wrote:

Posted: 09/ 21/ 05 8:14 am Post subject:

Posted: 09/ 21/ 05 9:07 am Post subject:

GuzmanQ wrote:

Uh oh, another one cutting and running.

Can’t deal with the argument so the tactic is to switch the spotlight to what the adversary may or may not have done to provide aid to the homosexual afflicted.
Doesn’t work Theresa.
Begin a self-righteous rant to distract from it if you will, but the argument is still there.

Yeah that would be me cutting and running Rolling Eyes

and that would be you avoiding the context of the confrontation as usual.
You are correct about the self righteous rant…it was not necessary and I allowed myself a weak a moment of irritation with you. Point conceded.

You are all talk and no action Guz. You speak like a homosexual but you are very quick to accuse me of bearing false witness when I publicly tell you I think you are homosexual. According to you me calling you a homosexual in public is equivalent to you calling me a harlot in public. I think you assumed that I would be highly offended if you called me a harlot in public.( I wasn't) Therefore I am assuming by your comparison that I highly offended you by referring to you as homosexual in public. Why don't you want to be referred to as homosexual in public? What does it matter? Let me get this right, you accuse me of hating homosexuals. You publicly defend them to rant against Christians, but God forbid no one can suggest you are one. That would be a mortal sin.

Guzman Q wrote:

Well Theresa, you’re free to assume anything that you like.
But you made an unqualified public assertion.
Theresa wrote:
Guzman is part of a community that can be very aggressive when it comes to using inciteful language … homosexuals..

There can be no doubt Theresa that you have publicly branded me a “homosexual”.

I’m also free to assume anything that I like
For example, I’m free to assume that you Theresa are a harlot.
But if I say so publicly, if I aver it, then I’m sure that you’d have the HRC descending upon me pronto, and rightfully so.

You tell me that I would run to Human Rights if I were called something I wasn’t. I point out that I have been called many things…including having my physical safety threatened. I told you to act like a man and face things head on instead of running to mommy and daddy human rights. You did not address that Guzman. Why? Because you need mommy and daddy human rights to silence those who oppose you?

Your bigotry towards anything Christian has stunted (IMO completely) your ability to reason on any issue that has a Christian slant. Therefore discussion with you is pointless. You don’t have a clue Guz, you drank the Kool-aid and you believe everything you have been spoon fed about Christians. That is sad, because your bigotry is blinding you to the truth of what is happening in society right now. The sexual revolution is a failure, but we cannot accept that fact because then we might have to put constraints on our behavior. We will instead deny the truth and silence those who oppose us.

You tell me now Guzman how does the silencing of christians and the advancement of homosexuality enhance our society? How has and does sexual liberation enhance our society? Who pays the health care costs for all of this behavior? Who pays for the emotional cost for all of this? You will silence Christians and one by one all of the social safety nets set up by the Christians will close shop, then what? Will it be you and your homosexual community who steps up to the plate and feeds the poor, opens the aids hospices…ministers to the homeless? Tell me Guz what homosexual charities can I donate to, to help them in their cause to help the needy? I am just asking an honest to goodness question. According to you and your community, Christians have caused all of this pain and suffering, to the point that men like Stephen, Bishop Henry, Chris Kempling, are silenced….. What do we get in exchange for these men? Pride Parades!!!! More sex ed in school, sex, sex and more sex…. Maybe you can direct me to an information outlet that educates me on how the homosexual community will step in and replace all of the Christian workers out there who are presently keeping the social safety net together? Or maybe Guz, you and your friend just want the taxpayer to foot the bill, after you succeed in silencing the Christians?
_________________
Did you pray for Roy today? Pray

http://tiny.cc/Gz84b
`There is nothing more beautiful than to be surprised by the Gospel, by the encounter with Christ. There is nothing more beautiful than to know Him and to speak to others of our friendship with him.” Pope Benedict XV

Posted: 09/ 21/ 05 9:33 am Post subject:

Somehow I think this Simpson’s lyrical parody has messages for both GQ & Theresa:

kid: Hey! Who left all this garbage on the steps of Congress?

rolled up amendment: I'm not garbage.

(singing to the tune of Schoolhouse Rock’s “I’m just a Bill”)
I'm an amendment to be, yes an amendment to be,
and I'm hopin' that they'll ratify me.
There's a lot of flag burners who have got too much freedom.
I wanna make it legal for policemen to beat 'em,
cause there's limits to our liberties.
'Least I hope and pray that there are,
cause those liberal freaks go too far.

kid: Well why can't we just make a law against flag burning?

Amendment: Because that law would be unconstitutional.
But if we changed the Constitution...

kid: Then we could make all sorts of crazy laws!

Amendment: Now you're catching on!

---

Bart: What the hell is this?

Lisa: It's one of those campy 70's throwbacks that appeals to Generation-X'ers.

Bart: We need another Vietnam to thin out their ranks a little.

---

Kid: What if people say you're not good enough to be in the Constitution?

Amendment (singing):
Then I'll crush all opposition to me,
and I'll make Ted Kennedy pay.
If he fights back, I'll say that he's gay.

Congressman: Good news, Amendment! They ratified ya! You're in the U.S. Constitution.

Amendment: Oh yeah! Door's open, boys.

http://www.esquilax.com/flag/simpsons.html

	The time now is 02/ 09/ 10 10:15 am
	Home ∴ Forum ∴ Recent ∴ Register ∴ Profile ∴ Log in to check your private messages ∴ Log in FAQ ∴ Search ∴ Donate ∴ Activist's Toolbox ∴ FD Links ∴ FD Swag [ Login to join chat ] FD Arcade - Click Here-->