Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Gatherings, Protests, Demonstrations, discuss them all here.

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Connie Fournier » 06/ 10/ 12 8:38 pm

Awesome job, BK. You got a nice little war going here. Your mentor would be proud. =D>
"Some of my policing friends would be horrified by the fact that I`ve come to speak to an Anti-Racist Action conference this morning. Some of you are probably horrified by the fact that I just used the words `police`and `friends` in the same sentence." - Richard Warman, July 6, 2005
User avatar
Connie Fournier
Member
 
Posts: 20387
Joined: 01/ 06/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Maikeru » 06/ 10/ 12 8:47 pm

“There were not six million Jews murdered; there was one murder, six million times.— Holocaust survivor Abel Herzberg
"Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like." - Chesterton -
User avatar
Maikeru
 
Posts: 6855
Joined: 11/ 05/ 04 2:19 pm
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby free_life2 » 06/ 10/ 12 8:50 pm

Connie Fournier wrote:Awesome job, BK. You got a nice little war going here. Your mentor would be proud. =D>


Connie my comments to WV have nothing to do with BK. As I already stated Ben has acted like an ass in this thread and I agree with your comments towards him. But WV hypocrisy to come into this thread and criticize anyone regarding the life and death of children while he hides behind his absolutely disgusting position of pro pro abortion is worthy of all our contempt in my opinion. I don't think I have ever seen a more disgusting display on FD than WV act in this thread. At least Ben for all his anger and rudeness is pro life.

I apologize to you if I am causing any trouble for you, that is not my intention, but as for WV his comments here are pure hypocritical trash and someone needed to call him on it, imo.
User avatar
free_life2
 
Posts: 12333
Joined: 11/ 18/ 04 3:34 pm
Location: Heaven

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Connie Fournier » 06/ 10/ 12 8:53 pm

WV only got involved in this thread because BK was attacking me. I believe that BK was deliberately trying to start a war. He did this the last time he was a member here, too.
"Some of my policing friends would be horrified by the fact that I`ve come to speak to an Anti-Racist Action conference this morning. Some of you are probably horrified by the fact that I just used the words `police`and `friends` in the same sentence." - Richard Warman, July 6, 2005
User avatar
Connie Fournier
Member
 
Posts: 20387
Joined: 01/ 06/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Hailey » 06/ 10/ 12 9:13 pm

I agree with Freelife.
User avatar
Hailey
 
Posts: 21619
Joined: 07/ 03/ 04 7:41 am
Location: Edmonton

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby free_life2 » 06/ 10/ 12 9:27 pm

Connie Fournier wrote:WV only got involved in this thread because BK was attacking me. I believe that BK was deliberately trying to start a war. He did this the last time he was a member here, too.


I submit to your assessments on this Connie I don't want to cause you any trouble. I just recognized again WV hypocritical lecturing a pro lifer while knowing he supports the continued butchering of babies and it made me angry as the life and death of these babies is a bigger issue than any reason WV may have to defend anyone or anything going on here and he didn't stop at just defending you but once again blew smoke on his supposed support of both sides.

I apologize for my anger but not the truth I believe regarding WV.
User avatar
free_life2
 
Posts: 12333
Joined: 11/ 18/ 04 3:34 pm
Location: Heaven

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Connie Fournier » 06/ 10/ 12 9:39 pm

You are WV are more than entitled to disagree with one another free_life2. :)
"Some of my policing friends would be horrified by the fact that I`ve come to speak to an Anti-Racist Action conference this morning. Some of you are probably horrified by the fact that I just used the words `police`and `friends` in the same sentence." - Richard Warman, July 6, 2005
User avatar
Connie Fournier
Member
 
Posts: 20387
Joined: 01/ 06/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Darren » 06/ 10/ 12 9:57 pm

Hailey wrote:I agree with Freelife.


Well, as long as we're voting here, can I cast my vote for locking this thread? Seriously, it's time to move on. This helps nobody.
I am a John Doe
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Merci Seigneur pour la belle journee."
------------
The opinion posted above is mine and mine alone, and is not necessarily the opinion of Free Dominion or its operators. Free Dominion does not advocate violence, hate speech or an overthrow of the government.
Darren
 
Posts: 2032
Joined: 06/ 08/ 04 6:55 pm
Location: Newmarket, Ontario

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby WestViking » 06/ 10/ 12 10:37 pm

free_life2 wrote:
WestViking wrote:
free_life2 wrote: As for WV and all his usual smoke blowing he is pro baby killing.
AS IF YOU WOULD KNOW. :barf:
You have stated repeatedly you support women's right to choose to abort and the legality of it in Canada. But as in this thread you blow more smoke, you are not pro life in the least. Yes that is my opinion, but there is no middle ground in life and death.
You are a fraud and a liar. I have pointed out that the Supreme Court of Canada has held that under Charter Section 7 (security of the person) a pregnant woman cannot be deprived of her right to choose an abortion if she so wishes. The SCC went on to opine that there may be valid restrictions on abortion that do not violate Charter Section 7 and suggested that our legislators examine the issue with the help of qualifies experts. Citing the law as it presently stands respecting abortion does not make me pro-abort and you know it.

free_life2 wrote: My point in this thread regarding you is, you once again blow smoke in criticizing someone else while you support the status quo which is the murder of children in Canada. The facts speak for themselves. At least with most pro abortion people they don't try and hide what they believe with some pretense of being for both the right of women to murder their babies while pretending you have some concern for the dead babies.
You don't have a point; you simply chose an opportunity to pretend that you can sit in judgement of others. Get a life.

The pro-life movement will never successfully ban abortions. We could eliminate many abortions if we were to support Stephen Woodworth's Motion 312, currently before the Commons, which seeks to strike a parliamentary committee to examine at what point an unborn child should be considered a human being. The current definition is about 400 years old and the issue desperately needs to be examined. Are you lobbying your MP to give the Woodward Motion support and get this examination started?
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks.
User avatar
WestViking
Member
 
Posts: 21609
Joined: 12/ 14/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Winipeg, MB

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby free_life2 » 06/ 10/ 12 10:49 pm

WestViking wrote:
free_life2 wrote:
WestViking wrote:
free_life2 wrote: As for WV and all his usual smoke blowing he is pro baby killing.
AS IF YOU WOULD KNOW. :barf:
You have stated repeatedly you support women's right to choose to abort and the legality of it in Canada. But as in this thread you blow more smoke, you are not pro life in the least. Yes that is my opinion, but there is no middle ground in life and death.
You are a fraud and a liar. I have pointed out that the Supreme Court of Canada has held that under Charter Section 7 (security of the person) a pregnant woman cannot be deprived of her right to choose an abortion if she so wishes. The SCC went on to opine that there may be valid restrictions on abortion that do not violate Charter Section 7 and suggested that our legislators examine the issue with the help of qualifies experts. Citing the law as it presently stands respecting abortion does not make me pro-abort and you know it.

free_life2 wrote: My point in this thread regarding you is, you once again blow smoke in criticizing someone else while you support the status quo which is the murder of children in Canada. The facts speak for themselves. At least with most pro abortion people they don't try and hide what they believe with some pretense of being for both the right of women to murder their babies while pretending you have some concern for the dead babies.
You don't have a point; you simply chose an opportunity to pretend that you can sit in judgement of others. Get a life.

The pro-life movement will never successfully ban abortions. We could eliminate many abortions if we were to support Stephen Woodworth's Motion 312, currently before the Commons, which seeks to strike a parliamentary committee to examine at what point an unborn child should be considered a human being. The current definition is about 400 years old and the issue desperately needs to be examined. Are you lobbying your MP to give the Woodward Motion support and get this examination started?


You blow more smoke WV, YOU support a womans right to choose to abort her baby and have said so many times here on FD, that makes you pro abortion and not pro life in any respect. You are a coward that tries to have it both ways.

I agree this thread has become useless ....I have said what I felt needed to be said and am done...you WV can blow all the bs smoke you want but you are fooling no one.
User avatar
free_life2
 
Posts: 12333
Joined: 11/ 18/ 04 3:34 pm
Location: Heaven

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby Soulforger » 06/ 10/ 12 10:53 pm

Connie Fournier wrote:
Ben Kenobi wrote:
When you don't know all of the facts, perhaps you should refrain from acting like a dickhead.


Which is why I asked the question in the first place. If I knew all the facts, I wouldn't be asking you a question.


You weren't just asking a question. You were accusing and badgering me. You made a baseless assumption that I was behaving unfairly, and you acted like a jerk. Even now, when you know the facts, you haven't been man enough to apologize for treating me like that. You've shown your true colours, anyway.


It is sad to see such an important thread / topic derailed by forum bickering. :barf:
We need an elected Senate! :hurray:
User avatar
Soulforger
 
Posts: 3857
Joined: 11/ 24/ 03 3:26 pm
Location: West Coast 4Life

Re: Supreme Court Dismisses Gibbons Appeal

Postby WestViking » 06/ 10/ 12 11:09 pm

free_life2 wrote: You blow more smoke WV, YOU support a womans right to choose to abort her baby and have said so many times here on FD, that makes you pro abortion and not pro life in any respect. You are a coward that tries to have it both ways. I agree this thread has become useless ....I have said what I felt needed to be said and am done...you WV can blow all the bs smoke you want but you are fooling no one.
You are actually quite funny when you are angry and losing an argument. You lose the ability to comprehend what you read or just ignore valid arguments. It appears that your righteousness can be a problem for you.
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks.
User avatar
WestViking
Member
 
Posts: 21609
Joined: 12/ 14/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Winipeg, MB

Previous

Return to Gatherings & Activism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest