

Connie Fournier wrote:Awesome job, BK. You got a nice little war going here. Your mentor would be proud.
Connie Fournier wrote:WV only got involved in this thread because BK was attacking me. I believe that BK was deliberately trying to start a war. He did this the last time he was a member here, too.
Hailey wrote:I agree with Freelife.
You are a fraud and a liar. I have pointed out that the Supreme Court of Canada has held that under Charter Section 7 (security of the person) a pregnant woman cannot be deprived of her right to choose an abortion if she so wishes. The SCC went on to opine that there may be valid restrictions on abortion that do not violate Charter Section 7 and suggested that our legislators examine the issue with the help of qualifies experts. Citing the law as it presently stands respecting abortion does not make me pro-abort and you know it.free_life2 wrote:You have stated repeatedly you support women's right to choose to abort and the legality of it in Canada. But as in this thread you blow more smoke, you are not pro life in the least. Yes that is my opinion, but there is no middle ground in life and death.WestViking wrote:AS IF YOU WOULD KNOW.free_life2 wrote: As for WV and all his usual smoke blowing he is pro baby killing.
You don't have a point; you simply chose an opportunity to pretend that you can sit in judgement of others. Get a life.free_life2 wrote: My point in this thread regarding you is, you once again blow smoke in criticizing someone else while you support the status quo which is the murder of children in Canada. The facts speak for themselves. At least with most pro abortion people they don't try and hide what they believe with some pretense of being for both the right of women to murder their babies while pretending you have some concern for the dead babies.
WestViking wrote:You are a fraud and a liar. I have pointed out that the Supreme Court of Canada has held that under Charter Section 7 (security of the person) a pregnant woman cannot be deprived of her right to choose an abortion if she so wishes. The SCC went on to opine that there may be valid restrictions on abortion that do not violate Charter Section 7 and suggested that our legislators examine the issue with the help of qualifies experts. Citing the law as it presently stands respecting abortion does not make me pro-abort and you know it.free_life2 wrote:You have stated repeatedly you support women's right to choose to abort and the legality of it in Canada. But as in this thread you blow more smoke, you are not pro life in the least. Yes that is my opinion, but there is no middle ground in life and death.WestViking wrote:AS IF YOU WOULD KNOW.free_life2 wrote: As for WV and all his usual smoke blowing he is pro baby killing.You don't have a point; you simply chose an opportunity to pretend that you can sit in judgement of others. Get a life.free_life2 wrote: My point in this thread regarding you is, you once again blow smoke in criticizing someone else while you support the status quo which is the murder of children in Canada. The facts speak for themselves. At least with most pro abortion people they don't try and hide what they believe with some pretense of being for both the right of women to murder their babies while pretending you have some concern for the dead babies.
The pro-life movement will never successfully ban abortions. We could eliminate many abortions if we were to support Stephen Woodworth's Motion 312, currently before the Commons, which seeks to strike a parliamentary committee to examine at what point an unborn child should be considered a human being. The current definition is about 400 years old and the issue desperately needs to be examined. Are you lobbying your MP to give the Woodward Motion support and get this examination started?
Connie Fournier wrote:Ben Kenobi wrote:When you don't know all of the facts, perhaps you should refrain from acting like a dickhead.
Which is why I asked the question in the first place. If I knew all the facts, I wouldn't be asking you a question.
You weren't just asking a question. You were accusing and badgering me. You made a baseless assumption that I was behaving unfairly, and you acted like a jerk. Even now, when you know the facts, you haven't been man enough to apologize for treating me like that. You've shown your true colours, anyway.



You are actually quite funny when you are angry and losing an argument. You lose the ability to comprehend what you read or just ignore valid arguments. It appears that your righteousness can be a problem for you.free_life2 wrote: You blow more smoke WV, YOU support a womans right to choose to abort her baby and have said so many times here on FD, that makes you pro abortion and not pro life in any respect. You are a coward that tries to have it both ways. I agree this thread has become useless ....I have said what I felt needed to be said and am done...you WV can blow all the bs smoke you want but you are fooling no one.
Return to Gatherings & Activism
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests