OBAMA ADMIN: THE WAR ON TERROR IS 'OVER'

[Narrow Back]

I have always thought the "war on terror" is a canard. Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy.

OBAMA ADMIN: THE WAR ON TERROR IS 'OVER'

Today, the National Journal reported that a senior State Department official has announced, “The war on terror is over.”

“Now that we have killed most of al Qaida,” the source said, “now that people have come to see legitimate means of expression, people who once might have gone into al Qaida see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism.”
The article itself describes the Obama administration’s new vision of foreign policy, which admits no enemies. Everyone, in this view, is a friend. Islamism, says the Obama administration, is just fine, so long as it does not openly support terrorism.

This, of course, is utter foolishness. Islamism is a religious ideological movement that brooks no real alternatives – so while the State Department proclaims “a legitimate Islamism,” it fails to acknowledge that Islamism, “legitimate” or not, is deeply intolerant of any other modes of expression. Not only that, but Islamism works hand-in-glove with terror groups around the world. Simply because a regime does not openly house al Qaida does not mean that the regime doesn’t support al Qaida; just because a regime pretends at democracy doesn’t mean that it has real democratic values.

Obama has created the brave new Middle East – a Middle East that assumes that every human heart has the desire to vote, but not to be truly free; a Middle East that oppresses women and gays and minorities, but pretends at liberalism; a Middle East that despises America but hides that hate behind a façade of multiculturalism, even as it disposes of its internal dissenters.

In truth, Obama isn’t declaring an end to the war on terror – terrorism continues unabated each day in Egypt and the Palestinian territories and Iraq and Afghanistan and Sudan and Yemen and Syria and Lebanon and a dozen other hotspots around the globe. Obama is truly declaring an end to the war on Islamism. He has made his peace; he has surrendered. In doing so, he has condemned broad swaths of the world to darkness, and more immediately, he has condemned America to a defensive position in the world. Now there is no proactive America shaping the world to her own ends. Now there is only an atomistic world, a series of billiard balls, in which America waits to be struck before bouncing back.

To Obama, the war on Islamism may be over. For Islamists, the war on America is far from over.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012 ... -on-terror

[mindyrbusiness]

We're Losing The Jihadists' War On America
By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. April 23, 2012( CNS. News.com)

Have you ever asked yourself why, despite more than ten years of efforts –involving, among other things, the loss of thousands of lives in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, well-over a trillion dollars spent, countless man-years wasted waiting in airport security lines and endless efforts to ensure that no offense is given to seemingly permanently aggrieved Muslim activists – we are no closer to victory in the so-called “war on terror” than we were on 9/11?

Thankfully, we have been able to kill some dangerous bad guys. The sad truth of the matter is that, by almost any other measure, the prospect of victory is becoming more remote by the day. And no one seems able to explain the reason.

In an effort to provide the missing answer, on April 24th, the Center for Security Policy is making available via the Internet a new, free ten-part video course called “The Muslim Brotherhood in America: The Enemy Within.” (http://www.MuslimBrotherhoodinAmerica.com). This course connects the proverbial dots, drawing on a wealth of publicly available data and first-hand accounts to present a picture that has, for over a decade, been obscured, denied and suppressed:

America faces in addition to the threat of violent jihad another, even more toxic danger – a stealthy and pre-violent form of warfare aimed at destroying our constitutional form of democratic government and free society. The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover behind this seditious campaign, which it calls “civilization jihad.”

The Muslim Brotherhood? Yes, that would be the same organization to which President Obama recently transferred $1.5 billion of our tax dollars in a lump sum payment. To do so, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had to waive Congressionally imposed restrictions born of fully justified concerns about the nature and direction of the shariah-adherent government the Brotherhood is birthing in Egypt.

Mrs. Clinton’s presidentially-directed waiver came despite: the Brotherhood-dominated government’s hostage-taking of American democracy activists; murderous Islamist rampages against Coptic Christians and other religious minorities; the toleration and abetting of escalating violence against Israel in and from the Sinai; and official threats to jettison the 1979 peace treaty with the Jewish State. And matters have only gotten worse since the President’s largesse was made available in an unusual up-front, lump-sum payment.

Unfortunately, as the Center’s course makes clear, this episode is just the latest of many that flow from the subversion by Muslim Brotherhood operatives that has been happening within our civil society and governing institutions in every administration since Bill Clinton was in office. [During his presidency, a top Muslim Brother, Abdurahman Alamoudi, was actually put in charge of recruiting, training andcredentialing Muslim chaplains for the U.S. military and prison system. Incredibly, some of them are believed to still be in place today, even though Alamoudi turns out to have been a top al Qaeda financier and is himself doing hard time at Supermax on terrorism charges.]

The George W. Bush administration was similarly subjected to Muslim Brotherhood penetration and influence operations. As the course documents, the Brothers’ access to and influence with senior officials in the years after 9/11 helped shape policies that, among other things, induced the federal government to: use euphemisms like “terror” to describe our jihadist enemy; reach out to the Muslim community in this country using virtually exclusively Brotherhood front organizations as liaisons; and provide support to and participation in shariah-compliant finance – an industry engaged in what one of its leaders, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, calls “jihad with money.”

Unfortunately, those look like the good old days compared to what is happening under the Obama administration. Not only has Mr. Obama facilitated, and now underwritten, the Muslim Brotherhood’s takeover in Egypt and an increasing number of states elsewhere in the Middle East. At his direction, explicit or implicit, the U.S. government is systematically purging its training materials of any information that Islamists might find offensive – including, factual information about shariah, its impelling of jihad (preferably violent and, where necessary, pre-violent), the Muslim Brotherhood’s mission of destroying us from within, etc.

Worse yet, under Team Obama, Brotherhood operatives doing business as Muslim “community leaders” are being allowed to have a say in what sort of training and outreach is done from here on, and by whom. Could we have won the Cold War if we gave a similar role to the KGB or the American Communist Party it ran? Or World War II if that role had been assigned to the German-American Bund?

In short, we are losing what is more accurately described as the “Jihadist’s War on America” because we are being subjected to a systematic, disciplined and highly successful campaign of what the military would call “information dominance.” It leaves us, as a nation, witless about the true nature of the enemy and his motivations and therefore incapable of countering them effectively.

On April 25, Glenn Beck will release an important new hour-long documentary that addresses many of these same points entitled “Rumors of War III.” It concludes, as does our course, with a powerful reminder of what is stake if we persist in such behavior and continue to lose the Jihadists’ War on America – a quote from a speech Ronald Reagan gave 50 years ago that rings as true today as ever:

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”

[Julian]

The war on terror may well be over. The terrorists are in the White House and have taken over the senior administration of practically every institution and bureaucracy.

Meanwhile Americans sit on their hands.

[katsung47]

We heard no Al Qaida in Iraq, (in Saddam's regime) After US invasion, Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq to bomb the market and mosque.
We didn't hear Al Qaida in Kaddafi's Libya, now it is one force that "liberated" Libya.

Quote, "Libya: Al Qaeda flag flown above Benghazi courthouse

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...ourthouse.html "

We didn't hear al Qaeda in Assad's syria, now it conducts opposition attacks.

Quote, “top U.S. officials and analysts dismissed such proposals as hasty and unwise, especially given recent U.S. intelligence assessments that al-Qaida is operating in Syria to conduct attacks against the Assad regime

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/do...153756672.html “


The biggest question is what has "war on terror" done, after ten years war in Mid-east? Is that terrorist Al Qaeda? Does US cultivated Al Qaeda as its false flag force which is so strong now can "liberate" the "dictatorship countries"?

[Edward Kennedy]

The real enemy in every nation is lieberals and lieberalism.

[smallLliberal]

I have always thought the "war on terror" is a canard. Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy.

So true. It was a stupid name from the get-go.

They should have just called it what it was "war on al Qaida"

Bet then again, it would have made it more difficult to fool the American population into occupying Iraq.

That is what you get when you elect an MBA I guess, marketing slogans for a war.

[DA_Champion]

That is what you get when you elect an MBA I guess, marketing slogans for a war.

Right, they should elect a lawyer, so that he can't tell the difference between rhetoric and reality.

[RedDog]

The election campaign BS spins into high gear. Don't expect the Kenyan-Indonesian muslim to have a clue about anything remotely important. Time to make this naval gazing wanderer get a real job for the first time in his life.