Anti-Racist Canada member joins FreeDominion - Breaking !!

[Maikeru]

Sharp-eyed readers of the April 4 'nutterius200' post at 'Anti-Racist Canada', which morphed into Michael J. Murphy's April 5 'Daily Nazi' smear at 'BigCityLib Strikes Back' will note former FreeDominyan Kibbitznik Harry Abrams' April 7 comment left at ARC:

I know someone very well who used to work for Mr. Byfield at his magazine, and according to them, racism was not tolerated in that workplace, despite whatever views were held or expressed.

Fromm gets around quite a bit, and has made a career out of misrepresenting himself to others and hitching his wagon to "freedom and right wing patriotic causes" so I would hesitate at tarring Mr. Byfield just because he was seen sharing a podium with Fromm.

Harry missed a grand opportunity to voice a similar caveat on Feb 4 2012, when 'Anti-Racist Canada' mirrored Murphy's 'Daily Nazi' smear of FreeDominion co-host Mark Fournier.

For all intents and purposes, the 'Anti-Racist Canada' and 'BigCityLib StrikesBack' blogsites are closely associated with Richard Warman, who is actively engaged in litigation against FreeDominion.

...

In other news, the BCL thread referenced immediately above drew some interesting comments, shown below, some of which wouldn't be out of place on FreeDominion.
The final comment, however, reflects the mindset of those who support CHRA Sec 13.1 despite the 'deeds which betrayed the undertaking' of selective censorship.

Poyan said...
Whether or not section 13 is constitutional or not may be up to debate. What is not up to debate is the fact that section 13 is clearly a grotesque limitation of free speech.
Whatever happened to "I may not agree with what you say but I will protect with my life your right to say it"?

Frunger said...
"Whatever happened to 'I may not agree with what you say but I will protect with my life your right to say it'?"
The militant left/right has never believed in this statement.
Section 13 is a tool of these radical fringes of society but it's been the HRC that has chosen to ALLOW it to be used by only one side.
The vast majority of the Canadian public would agree with Voltaire, even if they couldn't tell you who he is.
Even lawyers who chase ambulances have more use to society than those who argue the benefits of the HRC. At least injured people have an easily understood reason for seeking compensation.
These lawyers should be spending their time setting up class action lawsuits against airlines for charging fat people for an extra seat. I hear that's a HUGE problem these days.

Terrence said...
Given my libertarianism, I can't exactly wish Warman good luck.
I do wish him a better class of enemies, though. Lemire... ugh.

Meir Weinstein said...
This sick Zundel follower is a nothing. The same Holocaust denial books that he follows is widely distributed through the many Muslim Brotherhood or Radical Islam groups. In fact, the first Holocaust denial books came out of Saudi Arabia authored by a so called Bill Grimstad ( a Saudi Agent) It should also be remembered that Mein Kamph is still widely distributed in Islamic Countries.

bigcitylib said...
Meir, he is one of the driving forces behind Bill C-304.

Meir Weinstein said...
It seems to me that you and your associates refuse to recognize the issues that I raised. I supplied the original evidence against Zundel when he was charged under section 177 (false news). In fact I helped get the AG of Ontario involved with the case. Roy McMurtry missed the Grey Cup game to attend a meeting at the Zionist Center. But times are different today. The Muslim Brotherhood and their allies are a clear and present threat worldwide. It is their web sites and material that should be investigated.

Hardy Weinberg said...
Ugh, these folks make me sick. Even if they are not convicted of hate speech, I am sure they will be convicted of other stuff

Professor of Reeducation said...
Sections 218, 219 of the criminal code do deal with hate speech. But, section 220 retracts it based on certain 'defences' one of which being 'religion'. If we can't see the historical problem with that, then this country is screwed imho.

Mordechai Maizel said...
Mr. Weinstein what you don't seem to get is that Section 13 can be used against Muslim Extremists in the same way it is used to deal with neo-nazis. By agitating for its removal you open the door even wider for these hatemongers to continue in their anti-Semitic ways.

[Edward Kennedy]

" for these hatemongers to continue in their anti-Semitic ways."


What about the politically correct bigotted hatemongers of the hrc's? Huh? What about the bigots of racist bilingualism? What about the bigots of affirmative action? What about the bigots of politically correct academia?

One and all are bigots, haters, and involve din hate crimes against Caucasians.

[Maikeru]

Yet another malicious commentary posted to 'Anti-Racist Canada':

We can also be thankful that Ted Morton lost his seat. Easily the most conservative member of the PC family (and someone who would have been at home in the Wildrose Party), his departure might move the PCs more to the center.

And we are also thankful for this from our friends at Free Dominion:

Alberta Election Results.....

Their tears of rage and anguish nourish us. If we could, we would lick them from their faces and call it sweet ambrosia.

Still, this doesn't mean our friends in Alberta shouldn't work at putting a real alternative in power next time. There's something a bit incestuous about having a very conservative party in power with an even more conservative (perhaps reactionary) party as the Official Opposition.

Apparently, 'conservative' parties in Canada are "...a threat to the Canadian way of life.", according to those behind the screen of anonymity at 'Anti-Racist Canada' - which purports to oppose 'racism' in Canada.

The ARC blogsite has shed any false pretense of objectivity, and revealed itself as a political blogsite demonizing 'conservatives', in close concert with Michael J. Murphy, aka 'BigCityLib' and Warren Kinsella, co-litigant with Richard Warman against FreeDominion.

There's nothing wrong with advancing political views online in Canada, which champion or disparage any particular political party in Canada

There is something wrong, however, with mounting a blogsite specifically to influence ongoing libel litigation, by consistent and malicious reference to one of the parties to such litigation, under the guise of being a 'third party' exposing 'neo-nazis' and 'white supremacists'.

[Maikeru]

Former FreeDominyan kibbitznik Harry Abrams reiterates the obvious after yet another political smear posted at 'Anti-Racist Canada' entitled Extremism in Wildrose
Excerpts:

Naberius200's article on Link Byfield's association with white supremacist Paul Fromm has resulted in more than 3000 hits since it was published, becoming the third most viewed article on this blog in only a little over 2 weeks.
... ...
Our friend Harry doesn't believe that Link Byfield himself harbours racist views himself (though even if that is true, we think that any association with Paul Fromm should result in electors questioning one's judgment) but an examination of other candidates indicate a worrisome lack of tolerance:

I don't really appreciate being misquoted.
That's a whole lot different than what I posted in comment to an article that discussed Mr. Link Byfield attempting to suggest that just because he was seen or known to share a podium with Fromm, doesn't necessarily mean that Byfield shared or shares Fromm's values and attitudes.

I personally don't know whether Mr. Byfield does or doesn't. But a friend of mine who I consider sensitive to racism conveyed to me their experience that Byfield wasn't.

I mind remind one and all again, that Paul Fromm commonly makes a practice of misrepresenting himself, sometimes as an innocuous "free speech" advocate, or "immigration pundit," and by so doing, gains audiences an even media coverage in what I would call a less than honest way. So one should not be too quick to judge others just because they happen to be standing next to Fromm on a podium or at any given event.

Without canvasing Mr. Byfield personally, or lacking any other substantive evidence it's simply not fair to tar the man as a presumed racist, or to misquote me one way or the other on the subject. Thank you.

Wasn't intending to misquote you Harry. I guess I just did a poor job of paraphrasing your position. I'll make the necessary addition.
* UPDATE: Not wishing to misquote Harry, we include the full text of his post here now:

I know someone very well who used to work for Mr. Byfield at his magazine, and according to them, racism was not tolerated in that workplace, despite whatever views were held or expressed.

Fromm gets around quite a bit, and has made a career out of misrepresenting himself to others and hitching his wagon to "freedom and right wing patriotic causes" so I would hesitate at tarring Mr. Byfield just because he was seen sharing a podium with Fromm.

It's all good now.
Cheers.

Say Harry, I'm a 'friend sensitive to racism' too !
I've personally met and had discussions with FreeDominion hosts Connie and Mark Fournier, and in my experience they aren't racists either !
Please pass that on to the nutters200 at 'Anti-Conservative Canada' will you ?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers...Maikeru

[Peter O'Donnell]

That's creepy, the part about licking tears off our faces ... but in general the rantings of the ARC collective sound like bad speeches given by creepy dictators at the United Nations, designed mainly to cover up nasty things that go on at home.

[Edward Kennedy]

It needs being said that the nutters at arc/ara have trouble with squirrels. I find it really odd that these yahools and lefturds in general think the biggest menace to the world is racists. Really? How come we never see any condemnation of the black pussy cats for putting a bounty on ZImmerman's head, or criticisms of those who openly state he should be killed?

It all seems so funny these dweebs are never condemning naacp, or nambla, pornography, or heaven forbid, aborticide. Did they condemn their own gaffe several years ago when the fools attacked three youths, and were armed with steel pipes, but got their asses kicked? One was seriously injured. How about these coweirdos outnumbering their targets six to one?

Have these hypocrites ever condemned the bigotry of affirmative action, or bilingualism? Of course not, because those things are bigotry against Caucasians. The real racists are ara/arc. Idiots.

Naw, for my money, it is a fact the real villains, haters, racists and criminals are the nutters who hypocritically condemn harmless people while they themselves are criminals and liars.

I would not trust any of these nutters with a dog, and so called racists they condemn are much to be preferred to a bunch of lefturd loonie enablers of baby murders and perverts.

Sick people! I would be the last to ever want to be associated with such intolerant women stalkers and harassers, and general scum.

The real problem is lieberals of whatever color, not races per se and you cannot get worse than ara/arc intolerant haters.

[Edward Kennedy]

That's creepy, the part about licking tears off our faces ... but in general the rantings of the ARC collective sound like bad speeches given by creepy dictators at the United Nations, designed mainly to cover up nasty things that go on at home.

I would be afraid to allow them to lick ANY part of me, with their filthy disease ridden mouths.

[Maikeru]

Life Imitates ARC Department:

October 15 , 2011 Occupy Canada @ 'Anti-Racist Canada'

"If any of our readers...would like to share their pictures,
we would be more than pleased to post them on this blog.
... ...We would like to do our part to spread the message far and wide."

Heh...here's a few:
May 1, 2012 Occupiers try to blow up a bridge near Cleveland

[Edward Kennedy]

What a bunch of twisted hopelessly lost people...no rational thought, no logic, no nothing except a misguided bent to running in circles.

More than a few of them have an idea something is terribly wrong but they have not the focus to identify what it is.

More than a few wasted white slags, typical ara/arc material.

[Edward Kennedy]

Mission Statement
A group of diverse but like-minded individuals, the members of ARC have come together in their common desire to fight hatred, bigotry, intolerance and violence because of the harm these antisocial behaviors cause to our society. In that effort, we will not use or sanction the use of illegal actions (such as violence or intimidation) in pursuit of our desired aims and if we learn of anyone who does use these unethical methods we will report those individuals to the authorities. Instead, we will use the guarantees found in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that ensure freedom of legal speech and expression.




History demonstrates what many see, including self, as a misbegotten accumulation of heterophobes, babyaphobes, peaceaphobes, truthaphobes are all about in reality. Do some digging, the dirt is on the surface, the juicy parts are buried but still retrievable.

[Peter O'Donnell]

I'll bet that the 1% quite often drive to work across that bridge in Cleveland. I mean, nothing says plutocrat quite like Cuyahoga River with its fiery glow.

[Maikeru]

...nothing says plutocrat quite like Cuyahoga River with its fiery glow.

Cayahoga River...

[backhoe]

...the members of ARC have come together in their common desire to fight hatred, bigotry, intolerance...

Anti bigot bigots. You have to laugh at these intolerant goofballs. Down here they'd wear white robes & try to burn crosses- and we'd laugh them out of town.

[troubleinutopia]

The question that I'd like answered is - Does the word racism convey to ARC anything but racism spouted by "white" people? If it doesn't, why is there an Ethnic Chinese Canadian Political Party (NAP) in Richmond, BC or countless other "visible minority" associations throughout Canada?

Doesn't the Charter give every individual, except of course descendants of white Europeans (by way of 15.2, affirmative action programs), equal status? If not, why don't they challenge supposed injustices in the courts?

[Maikeru]

The question that I'd like answered is - Does the word racism convey to ARC anything but racism spouted by "white" people?

No.
Conservatives? Yes.