I would agree that it's glass half full, which means half empty ... and so on a good day Harper looks good, on a bad day he looks bad.
Problem is, what the world community needs desperately right now is a conservative leader with the sort of stand-up-and-fight mentality of Vaclav Havel, but he was representing too small a player, it needs to be Harper or more ideally Cameron, or best case scenario Sarah Palin.
Somebody has to start swinging hard at the globalist lurching frankenstein monster, whether you view it from the Hubert Mitchell perspective or just see it as the mass-unconcsious synergy of millions of leftist-progressive dreams of socialist utopia randomly coalescing around opportunities such as climate change and gay rights, the conclusions are the same, we face the hell on earth of becoming Chinese colonies and wage slaves ever more squeezed and then placated by a new flood of cheap trinkets to make our situations tolerable.
We have to get off the globalist treadmill and overthrow political correctness, otherwise our societies will rot from within and something strong and energetic, whether Islam or Chinese communism, will take over the structure. In fact, I agree with those who say, we need to investigate very carefully the links between Chinese cash under the table and our political elites. Who is in the pay of the Beijing government even today? There have been suggestions that this includes cabinet ministers at various levels of government. With the steady flow of resources out to China at very favourable exchange rates vis-a-vis the flood of return trade, it can be argued that we are already more or less the crown jewel of the Chinese empire, with financing partly supplied by the co-operative friends in the Gulf states.
Liberals are only concerned about their entitlements. They neither notice these things, nor care about them. Among them, there is a great nostalgia for the hippie times when Chairman Mao was the icon of revolutionary change. The idea of becoming Chinese slaves probably appeals to most Canadian pot-smoking progressives. Harper says he's a conservative but increasingly, he thinks like a liberal -- "how do I get things really cushy for my faction, my tribe?" It may work well short-term in high-vote-yield areas but in the long term there is no strategic thinking about our place in the world, what if the Chinese decide to squeeze us harder for our resources?
Harper doesn't think in terms of personal freedom or cultural integrity, he's really more of a textbook economist and probably an asset in that limited sense, but if we lose our souls what good is the second car in the driveway? His attitude to abortion tells a lot, it would cost him nothing politically to say that he had personal misgivings about abortion but he makes it sound like he isn't going to let that "fringe issue of evangelicals" end his stay at 24 Sussex Drive -- I wonder what he says on Sundays about all that.


