Mark and Connie are APPEALING!! Report by Jordan Press

[Narrow Back]

What level of the court system will hear the appeal?

Also, can further documents be filed in the coming days to support the appeal?

What is the expected time line for a decision?

It will be heard in Appeals Court. I believe other documents can be filed, because we are allowed to have intervenors.

There will have to be a Motion hearing to determine if we are allowed to appeal. That is set for April 23rd. Now, there is a glitch that we will be in contempt on Thursday if we can't get a stay of the order until the motion hearing. We tried to get a motion hearing on Thursday, but that day was closed, and the 23rd was the first one available.

So, for those who are "pray-ers", you can pray that Barbara will be able to get a stay of the order until our motion hearing.

Otherwise, things fall apart.

The short timeline on this thing is really frustrating.

I seem to recall some slowness by You Know Who and/or his lawyers in meeting earlieer deadlines. Funny how some deadlines are easily extended while others are set ridiculously short. Even a rent review board gives 30 days to appeal a ruling in most jurisdictions that I am aware of.

Everybody knows the dice are loaded

This is utterly sickening. It is so obvious what is going on here. Disgusting.

[TomFoolery]

The MSM is doing its best to ignore/not report on much of this...

The conventional, mainstream MSM, (except for a few exceptions) are liberals who hold stereoptyped and platitudinous views of conservatives. They regard us as "right-wing", and even "far-right-wing". They are totally ignorant of conservatism and who we are, and rely on misperceptions, myths and falsehoods to label us. Thus, when reporting on HRC's they tend to lump us in with neo-nazis, and other "far-right" elements, thus delegitimizing us. As far as liberals are concerned only they are "normal", and the center. To them, conservatives are unknown territory, and potentially scary, and thus legitimate targets of the HRC's.

This is why I prefer the term "classical liberal"....it implies how far THEY'VE moved away from true liberalism, and pretty much describes my views. Principled Conservatism is very near the same as classical liberalism.

[BlawBlaw]

Something to think about is if Mark and Connie make it a policy to not keep any member information, they may be exposing themselves to liability as a matter of wilfull blindness.

A possibility is to use an interpleader to place the names and contact information in escrow with the court. If the John Doe's don't want their name released, then they can get their own lawyer and fight it rather than Mark and Connie having to carry the entire burden.

Talk to Barbara about these suggestions.

[TomFoolery]

Something to think about is if Mark and Connie make it a policy to not keep any member information, they may be exposing themselves to liability as a matter of wilfull blindness.

A possibility is to use an interpleader to place the names and contact information in escrow with the court. If the John Doe's don't want their name released, then they can get their own lawyer and fight it rather than Mark and Connie having to carry the entire burden.

Talk to Barbara about these suggestions.

Interesting. BB: Given there are 8 John Does and a lawsuit of 50k, how would the judge divide up the damages amongst them. What if one can't pay, do the other's have to make up the dif? eg. Several, joint and several, etc.

[Edward Kennedy]

Something to think about is if Mark and Connie make it a policy to not keep any member information, they may be exposing themselves to liability as a matter of wilfull blindness.

A possibility is to use an interpleader to place the names and contact information in escrow with the court. If the John Doe's don't want their name released, then they can get their own lawyer and fight it rather than Mark and Connie having to carry the entire burden.

Talk to Barbara about these suggestions.

Best thing is to be loaded for bear and then get in their facist faces by using one's real identity.

[Peter O'Donnell]

I would probably choose between civil disobedience and a hunger strike if confronted by Warman and his communist court.

I continue to view his activities as undeclared socialist, indeed communist, revolution.

The fact that the Canadian government is prepared to allow him to engage in this revolution on their dime makes them, de facto, communist revolutionaries, whether that's what they see in the mirror or not.

Truth hurts. Just like Obama and company finding out what Cheney told the Israelis about them -- so now Cheney's the problem according to the media.

Just like I'm supposed to be a Nazi because I correctly identified our homegrown communist revolutionaries as being what anyone can see that they are. Don't shoot the messenger.

Our legal and judicial system in Canada is completely corrupt, I would not want to have anything to do with the people in it. Canadian lawyers should have stood up and protested Section 13 when it was passed, instead of rubbing their hands in glee about all the new work it would bring them.

[fourhorses]

I would probably choose between civil disobedience and a hunger strike if confronted by Warman and his communist court.
.

I'd demand that your local MacDonalds with the food safety issue be the sole purveyor of food to the kangaroo court.

[Edward Kennedy]

I would probably choose between civil disobedience and a hunger strike if confronted by Warman and his communist court.
.

I'd demand that your local MacDonalds with the food safety issue be the sole purveyor of food to the kangaroo court.

I would prefer that the kangaroo court inquisitors be given Chinese chicken boated here in unrefrigerated ship, and served by a chef with HIV, all degrees of hepatitus, TB, and leprosy.

[Edward Kennedy]

I would probably choose between civil disobedience and a hunger strike if confronted by Warman and his communist court.

I continue to view his activities as undeclared socialist, indeed communist, revolution.

The fact that the Canadian government is prepared to allow him to engage in this revolution on their dime makes them, de facto, communist revolutionaries, whether that's what they see in the mirror or not.

Truth hurts. Just like Obama and company finding out what Cheney told the Israelis about them -- so now Cheney's the problem according to the media.

Just like I'm supposed to be a Nazi because I correctly identified our homegrown communist revolutionaries as being what anyone can see that they are. Don't shoot the messenger.

Our legal and judicial system in Canada is completely corrupt, I would not want to have anything to do with the people in it. Canadian lawyers should have stood up and protested Section 13 when it was passed, instead of rubbing their hands in glee about all the new work it would bring them.

My position is that a law, even passed by politico aholes, is not constitutional when it is immoral. hrc's are immoral and fascist, incompetent and damnable. Therefore they are illegitimate, especially when i have deceased relatives who shot better people than these twits and were hailed as doing their duty for doing so.

[Edward Kennedy]

It will be a hot day at the North Pole when some damned fascist tells me what I can think, or what opinions I can hold, and the law be damned!!!

[EdS]

I would prefer that the kangaroo court inquisitors be given Chinese chicken boated here in unrefrigerated ship, and served by a chef with HIV, all degrees of hepatitus, TB, and leprosy.

Mmm-mm, tasty!

[Edward Kennedy]

I would prefer that the kangaroo court inquisitors be given Chinese chicken boated here in unrefrigerated ship, and served by a chef with HIV, all degrees of hepatitus, TB, and leprosy.

Mmm-mm, tasty!

...and terminal. Good ending to a bad beginning.

[Connie Fournier]

I noticed that the Whig editorial that was written yesterday, that was critical of us...was unsigned.

[Peter O'Donnell]

I should be flattered, I suppose, that Mark Steyn apparently thinks that it would make any difference if I came out "into the open" and made my points using my public identity.

The problem is, my public identity is a non-event of stupendous proportions. It would go something like this:

R.S. of greater Vancouver says that ... blah blah.

Who is R.S. then?

Basically, some nobody that was blacklisted thirty years ago and turned into a non-citizen at that time.

So why is this relevant today?

It isn't. If Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant can't get through to Canada from their relatively powerful positions, my voice would be like a whisper from the grave.

Can you hear that whisper, above the noise of the rushing multitude? That is your freedom leaking out into the void of space.

[Johanecote]

perhaps none of you ever heard of cyberbullying

<img src=http://i44.tinypic.com/11l7up1.jpg>