Entropy Squared wrote:With such a safe sounding name as the Canadian Human Rights Commission, one would expect to be greeted by a human being, other than a security guard, and maybe be offered a cup of coffee. Instead, the CHRC foyer screams, "This is as far as you go!"
And it is.
Right on. I have had many meetings in the CHRC offices and there is a clear sense of not being welcomed. With most regulators you can usually establish a rapport if you deal with them often enough. That is not the case with the CHRC.
Fairweather set the tone with his confrontational approach and by running the Commission as a star chamber. He was well known for his rantings when told he would have to dismiss a case. He was always wanting to push the CHRA a lot further than the law allowed. His pernicious behavior is still present today in the Commission.
Harper had the opportunity to try and stop the rot but decided to appoint a technocrat as Chief Commish.
And so the beat goes on.
The CHRA needs to scrapped and a whole new approach to human rights needs to be developed. The CHRC's confrontational approach is merely bringing the administration of human rights into disrepute - as it is in many others countries too, especially the EU.
I once filed with the CHRC an access to information request - routine research reports. It took 15 months. I was told continually that "they were being translated". Eventually however I got them - bilingually!