The time now is 09/ 02/ 10 10:32 pm 
Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum Index
Home  ∴ Forum  ∴ Recent  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in
FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Donate ∴  Activist's Toolbox ∴  FD Links ∴  FD Swag  

[ Login to join chat ]  FD Arcade - Click Here-->    
   

Warman's Latest Trick
Armory
Edward Kennedy
C2C Journal
 Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada's phony-racism ind Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next Page 1 of 6
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  

 

 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexCensorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OfflineAdmin
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 2:34 pm    Post subject: Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada's phony-racism ind Reply with quote

editor's note - The original article that appeared in this post was successfully censored by Richard Warman using copyright law. To preserve the historical record it has been replaced by transcribed excerpts from Richard Warman's statement of claim against the author of the original article and against Free Dominion.

Quote:
(a) The headline of the article reads “Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada’s phony-racism industry.

(b) The words in the first paragraph “Canadians now know the precise moment when radical anti-racism became a more powerful sociological toxin than racism itself: 7:55pm EST on Sept. 5, 2003.

(c) The second paragraph where the text of the Cools note is reproduced.

(d) The third paragraph where it is stated “Horrible, shocking stuff. But even more shocking is the identity of the fellow whose electronic fingerprints were all over the message: famed human-rights lawyer Richard Warman.

(e) The fourth paragraph where it is stated “But during the proceedings surrounding one of Warman’s 2003-era complaints against freedomsite, the respondents turned the tables. A computer expert named Bernard Klatt did some digging under freedomsite’s back office, and determined that the Cools posting had been made from a computer bearing the IP address 66.185.84.204, the very same address from which Warman had admitted to visiting freedomsite using a different alias.

(f) The fifth paragraph where it is stated “Other technical details—such as the operating system and Web browser being used—also provided an exact match to Warman. Based on this evidence, Klatt concluded in a recently publicized affidavit, “Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed ‘Cools don’t belong in our Senate.’


Richard Warman sued over this article because he (Warman) said it means that:

Quote:
(a) Mr. Warman fabricates racist conduct;

(b) Mr. Warman authored the Cools Posting;

(c) Mr. Warman published the Cools Posting;

(d) Mr. Warman authored and published the Cools Posting;

(e) Bernard Klatt is a credible witness and his evidence is true;

(f) Mr. Warman fabricates allegations of racism to create bigots where there are none; and

(g) Mr. Warman creates hate speech.


These excerpts are from a public document.

The original article can still be found here: http://www.richardwarman.com/covert_ops-90sAreOver.html
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
styky
PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

visit the link and leave a comment for Johnathan
_________________
FREE DOMINION FORUM RULES
All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom; justice; honor; duty; mercy; hope ~ Sir Winston Churchill
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people''''s money." Margaret Thatcher
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineDarski
Avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Total posts: 2685
Gender: Female

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am not convinced that RW does not believe what he wrote about Sen. Cools. Those words came to him very easily it seems

We have seen his Hate in action in the videos about David Icke; why would this case be any different?
_________________
My Canada does not include Quebec bring on the vote
Back to top
View user's profile 
styky
PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darski wrote:
I am not convinced that RW does not believe what he wrote about Sen. Cools. Those words came to him very easily it seems

We have seen his Hate in action in the videos about David Icke; why would this case be any different?


The problem with making accusations is that they can come back and bite you. I hope he has plenty of bandaids because he may need them.
_________________
FREE DOMINION FORUM RULES
All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom; justice; honor; duty; mercy; hope ~ Sir Winston Churchill
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people''''s money." Margaret Thatcher
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineMaikeru
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Total posts: 4880
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 5:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada's phony-racism Reply with quote

Jonathan Kay wrote:
As I’ve written before, this would not be so much a problem if their various speech codes were used merely to prosecute men such as David Ahenakew, Ernst Zundel, Jim Keegstra and the like.

Huh?
Is Jonathan actually positing that 'various speech codes' in Canada are okay as long as they only accrue to Jew-baiters ?
_________________
“There were not six million Jews murdered; there was one murder, six million times.— Holocaust survivor Abel Herzberg
"Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like." - Chesterton -
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineMark Fournier
Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 15602
Location: Kingston, ON
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's gone!
_________________
"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you." - Entropy Squared
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
texasredtop
Avatar

Gender: Female

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What seems more likely is that – like other anti-racism activists – Warman simply found himself running out of Aryan Nation types to chase around the Internet.


Exactly what I thought. When there isn't anymore money to be made from your cash cow, play dirty. Afterall, he thinks he's the smartest person on two legs and no one would ever dream that he could come up with such a scheme. Rolling Eyes
_________________
Pardon me Dick, but opinions posted on Free Dominion are those of the individual posters and are not necessarily the opinion of Free Dominion or its operators.
Free Dominion does not advocate violence, hate speech or an overthrow of the government.


PRAY FOR ROY
Pray
Back to top
View user's profile 
styky
PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Entropy Squared wrote:
It's gone!


That's odd Think
_________________
FREE DOMINION FORUM RULES
All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom; justice; honor; duty; mercy; hope ~ Sir Winston Churchill
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people''''s money." Margaret Thatcher
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineEdS
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 16956
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 15
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably got a threat from Warman Kinsella.

Good thing we published it. I'm going to send it out to my email list.
_________________
"There are some opinions so stupid, only liberals could hold them"
-- after George Orwell

General Militia of Flight 93 reporting for duty!
"Let's Roll!"

"Groyser Chochem" of the Shadowy GroupTM


Am Ysroel Chai
Back to top
View user's profile 
styky
PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did a seach on the title and this article related to it shows up.....

Bernie M. Farber and Len Rudner: The 'banalization' of hatred
Posted: February 18, 2008, 4:48 PM by Marni Soupcoff
Bernie M. Farber, Len Rudner
July 28, 2006 must have begun as a normal day for Pamela Waechter, but it ended horribly wrong. She died at the hands of a gunman at the Seattle Jewish Federation where she worked as a campaign director. Her crime, and that of five wounded co-workers, was being Jewish.

In 2004, Statistics Canada issued a report detailing hate crime activity in Canada based on information provided by 12 major police services. It noted that 928 incidents targeting specific groups took place in 2001-2002, including mischief, assault and threats. In Toronto, the number of such crimes between 1993 — when police began tracking hate/bias crimes — and 2006, neared 3,000.
Full story
_________________
FREE DOMINION FORUM RULES
All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom; justice; honor; duty; mercy; hope ~ Sir Winston Churchill
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people''''s money." Margaret Thatcher
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineEdS
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 16956
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 15
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 02/ 18/ 08 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farber and Rudner are doing precisely what Jonathan Kay described - they are fetishzing hatred.

Like the typical timorous, fearmongering liberals they are, they presume hatred all around them. They are still living in the '70's and '80's, when the enemies of the Jews really were so-called neo-nazis and white nationists. Today, they ignore the real antisemites in society; the ones who burned down tyhe Jewish Day School in Montreal, and who continue to vilify Jews in our society.

The neo-nazis and White Nationalists are picayune in comnparison with our new crop of hatemongers.

Farber and Rudner are living in the past and fetishzing hate.
_________________
"There are some opinions so stupid, only liberals could hold them"
-- after George Orwell

General Militia of Flight 93 reporting for duty!
"Let's Roll!"

"Groyser Chochem" of the Shadowy GroupTM


Am Ysroel Chai
Back to top
View user's profile 
fourhorses
PostPosted: 02/ 19/ 08 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What isn't in the least banal about this piece is that Farber & Rudner have managed to avoid reference to the real threat posed by Islamofascism. Why the silence when B'nai Brith has been actively involved in attempts to censor a Pro-Palestinian internet site via the CHRC that it considers to be unduly critical of Israel, a site whose articles it claims have crossed the line of hate speech violations? Examples cited include :“The idea that Israel has no right to exist or that Israel is an apartheid state”. Newsflash guys, I can visit virtually any progressive/leftist blog and run into this stuff, heck it's a staple at Rabble.ca. Hell I think Judy Rebick may even have a tattoo like that, Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

This is pure speculation on my part but I am given to wonder if the whole Basement Neo-Nazi Hunt was simply a means to an end. Was the goal to test the elasticity and sticking power of Section 13 (1), to set precedents that could then be applied against other enemies? The Neo-Nazi's are virtual pariahs and hence a fine target, who wants to be seen coming to their aid? Right Warren?

Why do Farber & Rudner cite the tragic death of Pamela Waechter, but fail to mention that she died at the hands of anti-Israel shooter Naveed Haq, who it should be rightly noted may have been suffering from mental illness? Failure to mention that Haq is Muslim and a Fanatic can't have been a charitable omission on the part of Farber & Rudner, otherwise why cite this example at all? Why the politically correct chill? The failure to discuss the threat of Islamofascism openly destroys the credibility of their defense. A whole raft of hate crimes statistics are also trotted out, without analysis, proving once again - nothing.

Finally Farber & Rudners defense of the Warmanization of hatred, hits a near hysterical pitch with the recital of the now familiar trope that opponents of Section 13(1) want to eviscerate the Canadian Human Rights Act. No not really guys. We just want to make sure that Section 13(1) is eviscerated, so the unscrupulous members of society won't use it against you and the rest of us.


http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.com/2008/02/bernie-m-farber-and-len-rudner.html
_________________
Freedom really does not evolve, it revolts.

Today`s rebel is a conservative and fiscal responsibility has become the new counterculture!
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineEdS
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 16956
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 15
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 02/ 19/ 08 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

National Post just published Farber & Rudner's poltroonish drivel on their Editorial page today. Time to write letters.
Letter just sent.
_________________
"There are some opinions so stupid, only liberals could hold them"
-- after George Orwell

General Militia of Flight 93 reporting for duty!
"Let's Roll!"

"Groyser Chochem" of the Shadowy GroupTM


Am Ysroel Chai
Back to top
View user's profile 
OnlineTomFoolery
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Total posts: 5872

PostPosted: 02/ 19/ 08 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to know definitively what happened to Jonathan Kay's article.

Last edited by TomFoolery on 02/ 19/ 08 1:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile 
WestViking
PostPosted: 02/ 19/ 08 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EdS wrote:
National Post just published Farber & Rudner's poltroonish drivel on their Editorial page today. Time to write letters.
Letter just sent.


My submission:

Section 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act prohibits . . . . "any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt" . . .

The notion that a person can be held guilty of potentially hurting some unnamed person's feelings sometime in future is nauseous.

Moreover, the purpose of the Canadian Human Rights Act is to extend the laws in Canada to give effect, within the purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of Parliament, to the principle that all individuals should have an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated, consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society.

There is no provision in the purpose of the Act to protect groups, sorts, or communities of people, but to protect the equality of opportunity for individuals.

We have Criminal Code provisions to deal with acts of hatred that endanger life and limb such as incitement to genocide, and further Criminal Code provisions to extend punishment for other crimes if it can be shown that those crimes were motivated by hatred.

The tiny and sorry minority who spout demeaning and degrading commentary respecting others need and deserve to hear the disapproving roar of millions of Canadians.

Silencing individuals who spout repulsive vindictive is dangerous, particularly when done through an arm of government. What Farber and Rudner propose is no better than the totalitarian censorship that led to two world wars; the only difference being that they are now the censors.

Irrespective of who acts as a censor in peacetime, our freedom of expression is extinguished and the stage set for silencing whatever critics Farber, Rudner and their ilk (or their successors) choose. These unelected busybodies need to be put in their proper place without delay.

My comments appear Here
_________________
Hall Monitor of the Shadowy GroupTM
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
Display posts from previous:   
 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexCensorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack


 

 Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada's phony-racism ind Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next Page 1 of 6
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
  Home ∴  Forum ∴  Recent ∴  FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in



Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs topic RSS feed 
Google Sitemap Generator
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group