The time now is 02/ 09/ 10 11:26 am 
Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum Index
Home  ∴ Forum  ∴ Recent  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in
FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Donate ∴  Activist's Toolbox ∴  FD Links ∴  FD Swag  

[ Login to join chat ]  FD Arcade - Click Here-->    
   

mckenzie
CRU Documents
Warman's Latest Trick
C2C Journal
 "women nigger imports knew their place" - Warman Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12  Next Page 1 of 12
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  

 

 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexCensorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OfflineMark Fournier
Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 15061
Location: Kingston, ON
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 12:16 am    Post subject: "women nigger imports knew their place" - Warman Reply with quote

Mark Fournier
Free Dominion
January 18, 2008

"Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!"


- Richard Warman referring to Sen. Anne Cools -


Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he "just following orders" issued by his masters at the Canadian Human Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn't seem to consider these words to be a problem.

But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse.

“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.
She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before
there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced
their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!


It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.

Complaint-less investigations by the CHRC have been in the news lately because information has surfaced concerning CHRC operative Dean Steacy and his official exploits as 'Jadewarr'. But compared to his colleague Richard Warman, Dean Steacy is a piker. Richard Warman enters a forum swinging as '90sAREover'.

In testimony beginning January 29, 2007 Richard Warman admitted under oath in Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing (Case T1073/5405) that he was, in fact, the poster named 'lucy' who had registered on the Freedomsite (and other) forums. What he neglected to add was that 'lucy' was not his first Freedomsite screen name. He failed to mention that his complaint-less investigation of Freedomsite actually began two months before 'lucy' hit the scene, it began when he registered on the Freedomsite under the screen name '90sAREover'.

Another miscalculation by Richard Warman was the technical expertise of the target of this particular setup operation. Marc Lemire is a techie, a networking nerd, so it was not much of a problem for him to find information on both 'lucy' and '90sAREover' in the Freedomsite database.

The table reproduced below shows information found in the Freedomsite database comparing Richard Warman's admitted 'lucy' identity (left column) to information about '90sAREover' (right column). This table infomation was gathered by expert technology witness Bernard Klatt and submitted as evidence to a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on February 8, 2007.

Admitted Richard Warman/lucy info
90sAREover info
IP address = 66.185.84.204IP address = 66.185.84.204
ISP = Rogers CableISP = Rogers Cable
OS = Windows 98OS = Windows 98
Browser = Mozilla 4.0 compatible MSIE 6.0Browser = Mozilla 4.0 compatible MSIE 6.0
ID = lucy (lucyaubrack@yahoo.ca)ID = 90sAREover (rob_m_simpson@hotmail.com)
setup using anonymous email accountsetup using anonymous email account
on obscure message limited-interest boardon obscure message limited-interest board
logged onto message board only twicelogged onto message board only twice
very short usage time (120 min)very short usage time (14 min)
no optional info suppliedno optional info supplied
created for single purposecreated for single purpose
used Nov. 11, 15, 23, 2003used Sep. 5, 2003


Mr. Klatt concludes in Paragraph 71 of his affidavit:

"Based on the information provided in this affidavit, in my expert opinion, I concluded that the Freedomsite message board user accounts "90sAREover" and "lucy" are those of Richard Warman and that Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed "Cools don't belong in our Senate" posted September 5, 2003."

There is also no doubt that the CHRC was aware of this internet posting by 90sAREover because it was a part of the original complaint filed by Richard Warman, when referred to tribunal. But this posting is no longer a part of the CHRC complaint against Lemire, the CHRC dropped it from the complaint the day after Mr. Lemire won a decision to subpoena Rogers' internet records.

This posting by 90sAREover would be a slam dunk in a real court of law, so why did the CHRC drop it from the complaint?

This story is far from over because the attacks on Marc Lemire by the CHRC are ongoing and with no end in sight, as are the attacks on many other Canadians by this government agency. This story is also far from being completely told. More ugly twists and turns will be revealed as those at the center of it all give us leave to report the details.

Slowly but surely the truth is coming out.

And it isn't pretty.
_________________
"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you. If you are willing to use violence to impose your ideas on your fellow man, you are a menace to society." - Entropy Squared


Last edited by Mark Fournier on 01/ 22/ 10 10:44 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
fourhorses
PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineVundo Draxon
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Total posts: 4536
Location: Arkham Asylum
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Warman should file a complaint against FD for the use of the N-word in this thread. Wink
_________________
The cause of liberty becomes a mockery if the price to be paid is the wholesale destruction of those who are to enjoy liberty.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail 
Offlineccrb
Avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Total posts: 1021
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 1:08 am    Post subject: Re: "women nigger imports knew their place" - Warm Reply with quote

Entropy Squared wrote:


"Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!"


- Richard Warman referring to Sen. Anne Cools -


Shaking Finger Shaking Finger Shaking Finger Shaking Finger Shaking Finger Shaking Finger Shaking Finger
_________________
Opinions posted on Free Dominion are those of the individual posters and are not necessarily the opinion of Free Dominion or its operators. Free Dominion does not advocate violence, hate speech or an overthrow of the government. Shaking Finger
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineConnie Fournier
Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2001
Total posts: 21101
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Age: 44
Gender: Female

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vundo Draxon wrote:
Warman should file a complaint against FD for the use of the N-word in this thread. Wink


He probably will. Rolling Eyes
_________________
There is nothing worse than a wormy, half-decomposed cheesebread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
Offlineccrb
Avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Total posts: 1021
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny how it is. I detected that the Clintons were racist a long time ago. And this "crusader" seems to be as well, judging from that posting.

It seems to me conservatives truly treat folks as folks.. at least those I know. In the US, I keep reminding myself that the republicans (conservatives) are the party of Abraham Lincoln and that the democrats are the party of Robert KKK Byrd and voter intimidation and suppression.

Getting back to Warman, seems to be a closet racist and it's gotten out.

That's what it appears ... anyway
_________________
Opinions posted on Free Dominion are those of the individual posters and are not necessarily the opinion of Free Dominion or its operators. Free Dominion does not advocate violence, hate speech or an overthrow of the government. Shaking Finger
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineTomFoolery
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Total posts: 5371

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am interested in understanding what provoked this little "outburst" by the man Warren Kinsella speaks so grandly about. Are they associates ?

And if Warman's comments are argued to have not been sincere - my second question is: Since when did PROFESSIONAL LAWYERS conduct themselves in a manner that puts ends ahead of means? Especially when it involves the Apparatus of the State?


Last edited by TomFoolery on 01/ 20/ 08 2:05 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineSmaug
Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Total posts: 7355
Location: Edmonton
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you kidding?

Warman manufactures "evidence" and the HRC knowingly continues to use that "evidence" until they are exposed.

This is far beyond entrapment. It is a crimminal use the levers of state to tyranize people.

Warman and the HRC should be sued for this deceit and the whole lot of them jailed.


Last edited by Smaug on 01/ 20/ 08 2:07 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineJ.B. Stone
Avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2003
Total posts: 38523
Location: Northwest Montana
Age: 60
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 2:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smaug wrote:
Are you kidding?

Warman manufactures "evidence" and the HRC knowingly continues to use that "evidence" until they are exposed.

This is far beyond entrapment. It is using the levers of state to tyranize people.

Warman and the HRC should be sued for this deceit and the whole lot of them jailed.


Yeah, it's called 'COLLUSION'.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
OfflineSmaug
Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Total posts: 7355
Location: Edmonton
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J.B. Stone wrote:


Yeah, it's called 'COLLUSION'.




I do not know what the iindictment should read for specific charges. But this demands a criminal investigation into the activities of the HRC, and a public enquiry to restore the peoples faith in their judiciary since such a tribunal is widely viewed as a judicial review.




I want blood Mad
Back to top
View user's profile 
WestViking
PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Criminal code:

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.
_________________
Hall Monitor of the Shadowy GroupTM
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineRed Green
Avatar

Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Total posts: 6852
Location: AZ
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WestViking wrote:
Criminal code:

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.


That's a stretch.

But IMHO Warman is the symptom, not the problem. You need to focus on the CHRC rather than the individual.
_________________
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death." ~ James Madison
Back to top
View user's profile 
WestViking
PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red Green wrote:
WestViking wrote:
Criminal code:

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.


That's a stretch.

But IMHO Warman is the symptom, not the problem. You need to focus on the CHRC rather than the individual.


Is it? What protection did Warman enjoy? The answer is none as the CHRC tries to shield him through use of an escape clause.

Whether Warman was an employee or a complainant, his uttering is just as pertinent as anything else the complaint addressed. Thus Warman can be cited for hate speech.

Now the CHRC process collapses, as the complainant is one of the respondents.
_________________
Hall Monitor of the Shadowy GroupTM
The most effective way to stifle democracy is to transfer decision-making from the public arena to unaccountable institutions: activist judges, human rights tribunals, parliamentary committees, civil service bureaucrats and political party hacks.
Back to top
View user's profile 
goldhound
Avatar


PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 3:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red Green wrote:
WestViking wrote:
Criminal code:

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.


That's a stretch.

But IMHO Warman is the symptom, not the problem. You need to focus on the CHRC rather than the individual.


Correct! There are ways to treat symptoms also though Eyebrows
I certainly hope that at least there will be vindication for Mark and Connie, as well as some recourse for their time, worry, and expences!
_________________
I have no "label" no "sticker" just a hidden price!
A liar will assume you are lying
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineRed Green
Avatar

Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Total posts: 6852
Location: AZ
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 01/ 20/ 08 3:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WestViking wrote:
Red Green wrote:
WestViking wrote:
Criminal code:

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.


That's a stretch.

But IMHO Warman is the symptom, not the problem. You need to focus on the CHRC rather than the individual.


Is it? What protection did Warman enjoy? The answer is none as the CHRC tries to shield him through use of an escape clause.

Whether Warman was an employee or a complainant, his uttering is just as pertinent as anything else the complaint addressed. Thus Warman can be cited for hate speech.

Now the CHRC process collapses, as the complainant is one of the respondents.


Again, I think the criminal complaint is a stretch, especially trying to tie it back to Warman.

But again, trying to take Warman down is the wrong strategy. Warman and the CHRC need to be wedded so that they cannot be separated in the minds of Canadians. The worst case scenario is that Warman goes away while the CHRC lives to see another day.
_________________
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death." ~ James Madison
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
Display posts from previous:   
 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexCensorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack


 

 "women nigger imports knew their place" - Warman Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12  Next Page 1 of 12
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
  Home ∴  Forum ∴  Recent ∴  FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in



Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs topic RSS feed 
Google Sitemap Generator
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group