"women n***** imports knew their place" - Warman

[Wlyonmackenzie]

Anne Cools is a staunch defender of civil liberty and freedom. She was the only friend we had in the Senate when we were fighting the Liberal's civilian firearms confiscation bill.

She shocked the smug statist left in the LPC who doled out her senate appointment under the impression that a minority colored woman could not possibly have classic liberal ideals about peeling the nanny state back from encroachment on civil rights. They were devastated that she voted against them and rallied a bipartisan force in the senate to vote against their soviet gun laws...she has similarly POed statist feminists vetoing capricious sexual harrassment laws and POed HRC speech nazis by vetoing more stringent speech code laws. All the left wing special interest pressure groups see her as an enemy.

Overall this token minority "affirmative action" senator has been a vast disappointment to the crypto racists of the "progressive" left.

I think she would be a valuable ally worth contacting on this issue of CHRC corruption and charter-incompatible process.

She sounds like a good representative, a good woman, and a good person to have on your side.

She IS on our side she was a Chretien appointed Liberal senator that crossed the floor to sit as a Conservative because she was at IDEOLOGICAL and PRINCIPLED odds with the LPC policies and agendas.

She is the perfect person to put on this because her sanate committee has jurisdiction over the constitutional corruption of the CHRC

She is currently a member of The Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.....this issue with the CHRC/Warman corruption just dropped right into the committee's jurisdictional lap

Contact info here:

Contact Info

178-F, Centre Block
The Senate of Canada
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A4
Telephone: (613) 992-2808
Toll free: 1-800-267-7362
Fax: (613) 992-8513


Email Address: coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca

[leewgrant]

A thought experiment: What would be the Canadian Human Rights Commission's decision if they were ordered to open their files or close their doors?

In the words of Oliver North does shred like hell ring a bell.
If I were them I would.

Government agencies are past masters at making files disappear.

[CrunchyCon]

This issue needs to make it into main stream consciousness, and be seen as an issue, before the CPC is pegged as "attacking the CHRC".

Well, to be honest, the CPC is unworthy of our protection because this is happening on their watch. It was the CPC who appointed the current head of the CHRC and things are getting worse instead of better.

This is neither about partisanship nor a political party. Throughout Canada's history political parties have come and gone. The same with politicians.

This is about protecting freedoms fundamental to any working democracy. These are the freedom of expression, the freedom of religion, and the freedom of the press. Any politician who refuses to stand for these freedoms is not worthy to govern.

If this was about putting forward a leader with the name "Conservative" who would tread delicately, then I would suggest we dump Harper for John Tory. However, our fundamental freedoms as Canadians are much greater than any politician, even one who happens to be Prime Minister of Canada.

[Wlyonmackenzie]

I have reason to believe that Warman now works for the Department of Defense and considering the less than honest tactics I find he used, plus what I think could be defined as criminal conduct in his role as previous employee of the Inquisitors, I have uneasy feelings about him being employed by that agency,

I also feel that Anne Cools, a very proper woman and friend of democracy should be informed of the names she was called, in addition to a public investigation of the HRC, Crybaby, and the tactics they use relative to their bullying/censoring tyrannical bent.

I believe it is proper that the Senator be informed of the PROCESS violations of the charter that the CHRC has engaged in...however Warman and the other creepy terdball were/are employees of the CHRC and Warman continues to work closely with that Federal justice department commission as an unofficial special status "complainant"/witch hunter..... and Steacy is currently employed as an investigator on Warmans compaints...these mutts are Justice department employees....it is this man who needs a spark shot up his lethargic arse about his employees running rogue:

http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/mag/index.html



If I recall correctly this spud was a limp-wristed Ontratio PC fart-catcher who wrangled his CPC candidacy by pulling PC strings in the interim CPC exec when everything was done by appointment.

This corruption and criminality in the CHRC and Warman's and Steacy's acts are his concern directly.

Wouldn't it be nice to hear this question tossed at Justice Minister Rob Nicholson during question period:

http://ezralevant.com/2008/01/questions ... olson.html

Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Justice Minister. One of his staff, Dean Steacy of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, has admitted under oath that, as part of his job, he joined a neo-Nazi website called the "Stormfront", and posted racist remarks there. Can the Minister please explain why taxpayers' dollars are paying someone in his department to join neo-Nazi groups to spread propaganda?

Mr. Speaker, can the Minister tell us: was this a rogue act by a single hate-monger who infiltrated the human rights commission? Or did others at the commission approve of this race-baiting strategy, too? Did the minister himself know? Or did he turn a blind eye to state-sponsored bigotry in his own department?

Mr. Speaker, it's not just Dean Steacy who spreads hate in the name of human rights, using taxpayers' money. Richard Warman does it, too. He used to work for the CHRC, but then he left to work with them, filing dozens of complaints at the CHRC about hateful words. But now it turns out that Warman himself writes many of those hateful words, including calling Senator Anne Cools a "n*gger" and a "c*nt", and then complaining about it. Will the Minister immediately intervene to stay all of Richard Warman's complaints, and launch an internal investigation to see whether the evidence he planted was done with the collusion of his old friends at the CHRC?

Mr. Speaker, given the confession of the Minister's employee, Dean Steacy, that the CHRC plants racist evidence that the CHRC then uses to investigate and convict others, and given the proof that the CHRC's most prolific complainant has planted racist, sexist remarks, will the Minister launch an independent review of all so-called "hate message" cases that the CHRC has ever conducted to see if they were all corrupted by planted evidence?

[westcoast woman]

For years Senator Cools has been the best person
in government fighting for children. She worked on
a Senate Comittee for Divorce to give fathers
rights to be a part of their children's lives.
Senator Cools also worked to raise the Age of Consent for Sex. To be insulted like this, shows
us what these tax-payer paid idiots have for brains.

[Connie Fournier]

I agree, westcoast woman. Senator Cools is a classy lady. She doesn't deserve this.

[westcoast woman]

Whenever I am phoned to take out a subscription
to one of the mainstream newspapers I have a
speech ready. I tell the salesperson exactly what
I think of their birdcage liner. I stress that we
know the paper is biased because of what is omitted
as well as the slant on what they do print.
One way to give your opinion is to cancel the
subscription, although we would miss the sports
section.

[TomFoolery]

This is neither about partisanship nor a political party. Throughout Canada's history political parties have come and gone. The same with politicians.

This is about protecting freedoms fundamental to any working democracy. These are the freedom of expression, the freedom of religion, and the freedom of the press. Any politician who refuses to stand for these freedoms is not worthy to govern.

Moreso - this issue highlights the fundamental importance of the separation of the legislative branch from the judicial branch. From what I understand - the principle of separation of powers began its most recent evolution with the Magna Carta. As with all our British Common Law traditions - such separation and the discipline of impartiality that flows from the separation is also under attack.

The fact that politicians can appoint their ideological teammates to a judicial organization amounts to Political Persecution being a structural element of our democracy.

Its time to blow that structure apart. (politically, of course)

[Wlyonmackenzie]

I agree, westcoast woman. Senator Cools is a classy lady. She doesn't deserve this.

I respectfully disagree Connie.

I have met with the senator a couple of times and YES she IS a classy lady and she is well adjusted, intelligent and gracious enough to take being called a "lady" as a compliment.

She also lives for putting politically correct control freaks in their place...she took on the gun ban issue with the verve of a warrior and I have seen the passion in her when she was denouncing the fraudulent SSM science proffered by the queer pressure groups. I als0o remeber her opening up a can if whup-ass on the likes of SOWs like Sunara Tabani.

She loves a scrap Connie...just like you...G'wannn admit it... you like a scrap too... you and the Senator are two peas in a pod.

[EdS]

Question from an American about "hate speech" laws in Canada: Why not just use a US website hosting company and have a US citizen residing in the US as the administrator? Wouldn't that put you completely beyond the reach of the Canadian censors? I can start a website about Canada and say whatever I want about anyone I want. Here in the USA, we can still say almost anything as long as we don't directly threaten or incite violence. Even when threats and violence are involved, the US government has to prove it in a criminal court, not an administrative hearing that the prosecution always wins.
Even more important, most Americans support the right of free speech even when we find that particular speech repugnant. Bush and the neocons are trying to change that, using 9/11 as the tired old excuse, but I don't see them succeeding any time soon.
Thanks,
-Richard

<b>Free Dominion</b> has done one better. They have sold the site entirely to a corporaton residing in Panama. The ownership and administration is done from there. For many years previous, the site's servers were located in the U.S.A., but ownership was held in Canada.

Now, they can't touch us at all.

[Padraigh]

Question from an American about "hate speech" laws in Canada: Why not just use a US website hosting company and have a US citizen residing in the US as the administrator? Wouldn't that put you completely beyond the reach of the Canadian censors? I can start a website about Canada and say whatever I want about anyone I want. Here in the USA, we can still say almost anything as long as we don't directly threaten or incite violence. Even when threats and violence are involved, the US government has to prove it in a criminal court, not an administrative hearing that the prosecution always wins.
Even more important, most Americans support the right of free speech even when we find that particular speech repugnant. Bush and the neocons are trying to change that, using 9/11 as the tired old excuse, but I don't see them succeeding any time soon.
Thanks,
-Richard

<b>Free Dominion</b> has done one better. They have sold the site entirely to a corporaton residing in Panama. The ownership and administration is done from there. For many years previous, the site's servers were located in the U.S.A., but ownership was held in Canada.

Now, they can't touch us at all.

Nobody is untouchable.

[CrunchyCon]

Senator Cools is a classy lady.

Ditto.

I've met many politicians in my lifetime. Without a doubt, Senator Cools is one of the classiest.

[Edward Kennedy]

Question from an American about "hate speech" laws in Canada: Why not just use a US website hosting company and have a US citizen residing in the US as the administrator? Wouldn't that put you completely beyond the reach of the Canadian censors? I can start a website about Canada and say whatever I want about anyone I want. Here in the USA, we can still say almost anything as long as we don't directly threaten or incite violence. Even when threats and violence are involved, the US government has to prove it in a criminal court, not an administrative hearing that the prosecution always wins.
Even more important, most Americans support the right of free speech even when we find that particular speech repugnant. Bush and the neocons are trying to change that, using 9/11 as the tired old excuse, but I don't see them succeeding any time soon.
Thanks,
-Richard

<b>Free Dominion</b> has done one better. They have sold the site entirely to a corporaton residing in Panama. The ownership and administration is done from there. For many years previous, the site's servers were located in the U.S.A., but ownership was held in Canada.

Now, they can't touch us at all.

Nobody is untouchable.

---------------------------------------------------------------

...least of all the clowns and bigots of HRC's....

[Theresa]

EDs wrote:

Now, they can't touch us at all.

What about as individual's.

[carfix2000ca]

Whenever I am phoned to take out a subscription
to one of the mainstream newspapers I have a
speech ready. I tell the salesperson exactly what
I think of their birdcage liner. I stress that we
know the paper is biased because of what is omitted
as well as the slant on what they do print.
One way to give your opinion is to cancel the
subscription, although we would miss the sports
section.

I haven't received a newspaper for years. I just go on FD or the internet sites, or the TV or radio