"women n***** imports knew their place" - Warman

[backhoe]

Anne Cools is a staunch defender of civil liberty and freedom. She was the only friend we had in the Senate when we were fighting the Liberal's civilian firearms confiscation bill.

She shocked the smug statist left in the LPC who doled out her senate appointment under the impression that a minority colored woman could not possibly have classic liberal ideals about peeling the nanny state back from encroachment on civil rights. They were devastated that she voted against them and rallied a bipartisan force in the senate to vote against their soviet gun laws...she has similarly POed statist feminists vetoing capricious sexual harrassment laws and POed HRC speech nazis by vetoing more stringent speech code laws. All the left wing special interest pressure groups see her as an enemy.

Overall this token minority "affirmative action" senator has been a vast disappointment to the crypto racists of the "progressive" left.

I think she would be a valuable ally worth contacting on this issue of CHRC corruption and charter-incompatible process.

She sounds like a good representative, a good woman, and a good person to have on your side.

[Edward Kennedy]

What concerns me is that this newsworthy item will not have any pick-up in the MSM...not unlike Ezra's situation.

The MSM has either been threatened into silence, or are complicit and agreeable with such activities.

ITs disgusting where we are at as a nation.

There are so many angles here for the MSM to investigate were they so intrepid. For example, assuming the affidavit is true (and there's little reason not to if Warman and the CHRC haven't denied it), what does Senator Cools think about a member of the HRC, likely acting under color of law, calling her the n-word AND the c-word (a twofer in politcally correct circles) in an apparent attempt to manufacture evidence to shut down a website and/or entrap its users?

By the way, according the answer, 90sAREover not only deliberately typed the n-word. He also approved it when told the word wasn't in the website's spell checker.

Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn will be on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor on Tuesday. What does it say about the Canadian MSM when a US cable news network is paying more attention to a Canadian story than they are?

--------------------------

It says loud and clear the MSM are a bunch of Whiteaphobic, truthaphobic, cowardly, shite for brains lieberal droidic Ditzy White females and Wimpy White males who most would not piss on the best part of.

[Mark Fournier]

Notice too, backwoods, that the word 'is' appears twice in the first sentence making it grammatically incorrect. I have made a similar mistake myself when posting, and it has always been when I had done some editing to the sentence and screwed it up in the process.

What this tells me is this wasn't something Richard Warman just rattled off in a peak of rage because Sen. Anne Cools was speaking out against SSM at the time. I believe Warman took enough care to edit his post to how it now reads.

This was either Warman's real thoughts or an obvious setup by him on behalf of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. But either way, the CHRC has been in on it from the beginning and they have been doing everything they can to hide Warman's tracks.

[Edward Kennedy]

I have often found that when someone acts maliciously and plays dirty games, inevitably it comes back to bite them. I have reason to believe that Warman now works for the Department of Defense and considering the less than honest tactics I find he used, plus what I think could be defined as criminal conduct in his role as previous employee of the Inquisitors, I have uneasy feelings about him being employed by that agency, unless it be as a toilet bowl cleaner part time worker.

When Crybaby filed the CHRC complaint against Terry Tremaine, he reportedly contacted his employer (a university or college I think) and gave them a deadline to do something about Tremaine or he would go to the media and to the police. Ultimately, Tremaine was fired and he wound up having a nervous breakdown. He was destroyed.

I wonder if Crybaby, now being in a very vulnerable position that he has placed himself in, would be wondering if the same could be done to him. I also feel that Anne Cools, a very proper woman and friend of democracy should be informed of the names she was called, in addition to a public investigation of the HRC, Crybaby, and the tactics they use relative to their bullying/censoring tyrannical bent.

After all, as I ahve always said, let the other side set the rules and then play by them yourself. How about it Crybaby, what do you think?

[Connie Fournier]

I agree that we've sunk pretty far. We have quite a long way to climb back and I would hate to see more damage done by making knee-jerk statements that will be used against the cause of free speech.

This issue needs to make it into main stream consciousness, and be seen as an issue, before the CPC is pegged as "attacking the CHRC".

OK, I'm going to try to be delicate here....

Quipu, you have made a grand total of three posts on this site and at least two of them have been begging us to be careful that we don't hurt the CPC.

Well, to be honest, the CPC is unworthy of our protection because this is happening on their watch. It was the CPC who appointed the current head of the CHRC and things are getting worse instead of better.

The way I see it, they can grow some balls and do something about this, or they can expect the exactly same amount of protection that their government has given us.

OK, maybe that wasn't delicate.

[Red]

When I read his words and then realised he was an agent of the State of Canadastan my first thoughts were he "Really believes what he writes". I could never write a post like that because it's so far away from the person that I am. He did it with ease and conviction, me thinks he's more like the people he persecutes than he'd like society to believe.

[Bunty Lawless]

If I may interject, this subject is a very good example of how a news media such as a Conservative Gazette, could possibly reach across and carry this issue to the forefront of a greater public. Too often, issues such as these will be buried in obscurity.

[Red]

I agree that we've sunk pretty far. We have quite a long way to climb back and I would hate to see more damage done by making knee-jerk statements that will be used against the cause of free speech.

This issue needs to make it into main stream consciousness, and be seen as an issue, before the CPC is pegged as "attacking the CHRC".

OK, I'm going to try to be delicate here....

Quipu, you have made a grand total of three posts on this site and at least two of them have been begging us to be careful that we don't hurt the CPC.

Well, to be honest, the CPC is unworthy of our protection because this is happening on their watch. It was the CPC who appointed the current head of the CHRC and things are getting worse instead of better.

The way I see it, they can grow some balls and do something about this, or they can expect the exactly same amount of protection that their government has given us.

OK, maybe that wasn't delicate.

You tell him sister, perhaps we have a new spy. Has a blindly loyal Conservative joined with the SSS HRC Agents on their war against Freedom of Expression???

[Mark Fournier]

The CPC has completely abdicated its leadership responsibilities when it comes to these 'human rights commissions'. If we don't lead them, they will continue to do nothing.

[Roy Wilson]

When I read his words and then realised he was an agent of the State of Canadastan my first thoughts were he "Really believes what he writes". I could never write a post like that because it's so far away from the person that I am. He did it with ease and conviction, me thinks he's more like the people he persecutes than he'd like society to believe.

Dissagree. I think he has this granduer idea he/ it whatever is a covert agent that is beyond the law. Isnt very good or bright and got his balls on the block.

[leewgrant]

The CPC has completely abdicated its leadership responsibilities when it comes to these 'human rights commissions'. If we don't lead them, they will continue to do nothing.

Right. I don't care if Stephen Harper had discovered how to turn camel dung into gold there is no justification for "going easy" on a political party when fundamental freedoms are at stake.

[Mark Fournier]

The Stephen Harper conservatives have the legitimate power and authority to bring this to a screeching halt. There is nothing stopping them but fear.

[Mark Fournier]

A thought experiment: What would be the Canadian Human Rights Commission's decision if they were ordered to open their files or close their doors?

[Fabulous Fred]

And if Warman's comments are argued to have not been sincere - my second question is: Since when did PROFESSIONAL LAWYERS conduct themselves in a manner that puts ends ahead of means? Especially when it involves the Apparatus of the State?

Sincerity is not a prerequisite for incitement. People reading those posts have no idea whether the post is sincere or merely a ruse. The printed word must always be assumed to be sincere unless it is made clear that the poster is being sarcastic.

These is Stalinist tactics at their worst. The CHRC employee makes the offending comments anonymously, fans the flames and then makes a complaint based on those comments.

[Roy Wilson]

A thought experiment: What would be the Canadian Human Rights Commission's decision if they were ordered to open their files or close their doors?

In the words of Oliver North does shred like hell ring a bell.
If I were them I would.