"women n***** imports knew their place" - Warman

[maxjones0]

It seems obvious to me that enough is known about the various HRC's to warrant a complete house cleaning of the entire organization.

And the paucity of complaints (44.7/ year average) makes you wonder if there ever really was a need for them. The Canada I know could not get more accepting of others without appearing sickeningly nice.

It sure is a juicy story. It is not often you get opportunities handed to you. The CPC is missing the boat on this one. I think our MP's should spend some time online rather than watching themselves on
TV.

[Red Green]

It seems obvious to me that enough is known about the various HRC's to warrant a complete house cleaning of the entire organization.

And the paucity of complaints (44.7/ year average) makes you wonder if there ever really was a need for them. The Canada I know could not get more accepting of others without appearing sickeningly nice.

It sure is a juicy story. It is not often you get opportunities handed to you. The CPC is missing the boat on this one. I think our MP's should spend some time online rather than watching themselves on
TV.

By all means, clean the house out!

And then burn it to the ground.

[backhoe]

Projection and displacement

http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2004/08/ps ... nisms.html

are Stock In Trade for our "friends" on the Left.

[cinyc]

I'm not 100% convinced that Richard Warman posted under the name 90sAREover. Based on a Google search, the IP address in question appears to have been dynamically assigned by Rogers at times to other people. That's why Lemire needs Rogers' log files to prove 90sAREover is Warman. (Though how many people were running a Mozilla Browser on Windows 98 in 2003? Windows Me was released in 2000 and Windows XP was released in late 2001.) But there's sure a lot of smoke there.

In particular, according to Paragraphs 57-60 of the Affidavit, Richard Warman admitted in HRC proceedings that he posted on the Stormfront website under the name "pogue mahone". According to the affidavt, "pogue mahone" posted 93 times on the Stormfront website. In one post, "pogue mahone" said that he'd vote for Nazi-sympathizer Adrien Arcand as "Greatest Canadian". "VIVE ARCAND!" In another post, "pogue mahone" wrote "Theres a reason it's called "White" Nationalism and why the founders of NS excluded sexual deviants that are like a Cancer to our movement..."

And, according to Paragraphs 52-56 of the Affidavit, Warman admitted in an HRC hearing that he posted on the VNN website under the name "Axetogrind". Axetogrind made 33 posts to that website, including a post that was signed "88" (which Warman told an HRC tribunal means "HH" or "Heil Hitler").

BTW - Mark Steyn has linked to this post on his website:

<a href="http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/901/128/">I'm not a hater, I just play one on the Internet </a>

If this is correct, I don't see how it's possible to regard the Canadian Human Rights Commission as anything other than a racket for one of its former employees. Why should Richard Warman collect five-figure sums from suing websites for "crimes" in which he has himself participated?

If the Affidavit is true, this is very disturbing.

The million dollar question is: is there any proof that Mr. Warman posted on Free Dominion?

[Edward Kennedy]

It seems obvious to me that enough is known about the various HRC's to warrant a complete house cleaning of the entire organization.

And the paucity of complaints (44.7/ year average) makes you wonder if there ever really was a need for them. The Canada I know could not get more accepting of others without appearing sickeningly nice.

It sure is a juicy story. It is not often you get opportunities handed to you. The CPC is missing the boat on this one. I think our MP's should spend some time online rather than watching themselves on
TV.

By all means, clean the house out!

And then burn it to the ground.

---------------------------------------------------

Wrong. Burn the house down period.

[Edward Kennedy]

<center> "Time to go back to when the women n***** imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!"

- Richard Warman referring to Sen. Anne Cools - </center>

--------------------------------------

I thin Crybaby used his racist and bigotted language here also for another purpose. Anne Cools has been an ally of the right side, a side Crybaby hates. Why would he not have chosen a black woman who is a radfem and/or proponent of lieberalism. I think crybaby has injected his lieberal anti-family bigotry into the equation.

Back to black women, I can see why the preponderancy of black males to islam. Regular black males with some exceptions tend to be abusive of black women(impregnate and abandon) and since abuse is a given towards women by islamic males, what better way to abuse women than under the guise of religion?

Black women generally have a burden, imposed by members of the opposite gender of their own race.

[Right-Wingnut]

And still the thot plickens.

I wonder what the opinion of the professional conduct committee of the Law Society of Upper Canada would be of his antics.

[Roy Wilson]

Interesting info.

This is one of many reasons I believe all posters should be made use real names that can be verified.

[Darski]

But again, trying to take Warman down is the wrong strategy. Warman and the CHRC need to be wedded so that they cannot be separated in the minds of Canadians. The worst case scenario is that Warman goes away while the CHRC lives to see another day.

I agree with this. The two must be as one. (ball of slime)

Edited to add...

has Senator Cools been informed of this opinion of her existence by a member of the government?

[Mark Fournier]

The million dollar question is: is there any proof that Mr. Warman posted on Free Dominion?

The only thing we know about the CHRC operatives working their scams at Free Dominion is that the screen name jadewarr is registered here but has not been used for posting.

According to sworn testimony by Warman's colleague, Dean Steacy, Steacy was the only CHRC operative using Jadewarr but sworn testimony by any CHRC operative is really meaningless.

Just for the fun of it I may write an article on the lies told under oath by CHRC operatives. The biggest problem in writing the piece will be limiting the number of examples to include because they seem endless and they are very easy to find in the public records.

[Mark Fournier]

But again, trying to take Warman down is the wrong strategy. Warman and the CHRC need to be wedded so that they cannot be separated in the minds of Canadians. The worst case scenario is that Warman goes away while the CHRC lives to see another day.

I agree with this. The two must be as one. (ball of slime)

If you leave a turd on the ground it will attract flies. The first step in getting rid of the flies is to get rid of the turd.

[Connie Fournier]

Interesting info.

This is one of many reasons I believe all posters should be made use real names that can be verified.

Unfortunately, the current political climate has made people even less likely to want to post as themselves. It's like wearing a target.

[Roy Wilson]

Interesting info.

This is one of many reasons I believe all posters should be made use real names that can be verified.

Unfortunately, the current political climate has made people even less likely to want to post as themselves. It's like wearing a target.

Guess so but I like wearing a target.

[Mark Fournier]

If the Affidavit is true, this is very disturbing.

Neither Richard Warman nor the CHRC are trying to dispute the veracity of the affidavit. They tried to have it excluded from their Red Star Chamber hearings, but now that the affidavit has been entered into evidence nobody is trying to deny its facts.

It must also be remembered that when all this was happening the CHRC and its operatives were riding high. The public was so terrified of being targeted next that very few people were willing to speak out.

In their arrogant over-confidence, the CHRC and its operatives never imagined they would be called to task for what they were doing.

[CdnRepublican]

Criminal code:

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.

That's a stretch.

But IMHO Warman is the symptom, not the problem. You need to focus on the CHRC rather than the individual.

Is it? What protection did Warman enjoy? The answer is none as the CHRC tries to shield him through use of an escape clause.

Whether Warman was an employee or a complainant, his uttering is just as pertinent as anything else the complaint addressed. Thus Warman can be cited for hate speech.

Now the CHRC process collapses, as the complainant is one of the respondents.

Again, I think the criminal complaint is a stretch, especially trying to tie it back to Warman.

But again, trying to take Warman down is the wrong strategy. Warman and the CHRC need to be wedded so that they cannot be separated in the minds of Canadians. The worst case scenario is that Warman goes away while the CHRC lives to see another day.

That is true they are linked and it is a crime to entrap, induce or create a criminal act where none previously existed.

Such evidence should look good in FDs case against Warman. Based on legal advice a reverse suit might be possible. I would suggest fight one battle at a time.....