Censorship freaks gangstalking Mark at work

[Connie Fournier]

Mark was talking to his boss today and he told him a really weird story.

He said a number of days ago a middle-aged blonde woman with her hair pulled back in a bun entered his office and asked for Mark by name. His boss told her that he wasn't there. She said she was his aunt. Mark doesn't have any living aunts.

Then, when Mark's boss refused to give her any more information, out of the blue, she said to him something like this, "Do you know if it is possible for someone to transfer the title of their house into someone else's name?"

So, the question is, was this person a REALLY STUPID private detective, or just a gangstalker groupie who decided to go freelance and try to find out information about our personal lives and our assets?

One way or another we will find out. If you are going to impersonate someone's family for nefarious purposes, you should check for the presence of security cameras first.

Morons.

[WestViking]

Oh dear! Security cameras!

[Red Green]

Oh dear! Security cameras!

Word that. Put up her mug on this thread.

[RadicallyLiberal]

Due to the misrepresentation and the potential threat you could post the pic on social media to find her.

Ontario was notoriously bad when it comes to Private Investigators and training.

Most people have no idea how bad it was. They lumped them in with security guards with the P.I. and Security Guard Act. Many security guard supervisors were dually licensed as a P.I. as long as the company sponsored them.

I got stuck dealing with a security guard contract as the liasion at an old job of mine and learned way too much of both groups.

seems they finally got around to basic training of them... ESL should be at the top of the training, from my experiences.
http://www.mcscs.jus.gov.on.ca/english/ ... sting.html

[Connie Fournier]

We are checking into the security camera thing. If we get a clear photo, it will be posted. For sure. Depending on where she parked, we might even get lucky and get her car and plate.

[styky]

Legal Definitions for Identity Fraud

http://www.business.mcmaster.ca/IDTDefi ... dLEGAL.htm

[styky]

Up until the time you mentioned the property question from her my immediate thought had been she's a process server.

[Connie Fournier]

Up until the time you mentioned the property question from her my immediate thought had been she's a process server.

We know the process server in our area and we have quite a good rapport with him. We usually have a nice chat when he gives us Richard Warman's stuff.

Somebody is obviously obsessed with knowing if we own property.

[pirapoi]

Connie Fournier wrote:

So, the question is, was this person a REALLY STUPID private detective, or just a gangstalker groupie who decided to go freelance and try to find out information about our personal lives and our assets?

There might be more options.

If the person wanted to try and get information without revealing too much about themselves why wouldn't they phone?
Something else that I wonder about - did this woman know for sure Mark wouldn't be there?

Then, when Mark's boss refused to give her any more information, out of the blue, she said to him something like this, "Do you know if it is possible for someone to transfer the title of their house into someone else's name?"

Whose house? and to whom?

[Connie Fournier]

Good digging, styky. I like this one:

1. Section 403 – Personation with Intent
Every one who fraudulently personates any person, living or dead,

(a) with intent to gain advantage for himself or another person,
(b) with intent to obtain any property or an interest in any property, or
(c) with intent to cause disadvantage to the person whom he personates or another person,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or an offence punishable on summary conviction.

I guess this means that Mark's old Auntie Racist could do some time.

[Connie Fournier]

Connie Fournier wrote:

So, the question is, was this person a REALLY STUPID private detective, or just a gangstalker groupie who decided to go freelance and try to find out information about our personal lives and our assets?

There might be more options.

If the person wanted to try and get information without revealing too much about themselves why wouldn't they phone?
Something else that I wonder about - did this woman know for sure Mark wouldn't be there?

We really don't know the answers to those questions. All we know is that she pretended to be Mark's aunt. For all we know she might have shot him if he had been there. (I'm only half kidding) All we really know is that she was lying to try to get information on Mark/us.

Then, when Mark's boss refused to give her any more information, out of the blue, she said to him something like this, "Do you know if it is possible for someone to transfer the title of their house into someone else's name?"

Whose house? and to whom?

She didn't specify a particular house. This question came out of the blue and I think Mark's boss gave her a WTF look so she dropped it. It seemed, in context, that she was attempting to get information on some house she thought we owned.

[styky]

Good digging, styky. I like this one:

I try

[shiva]

Connie Fournier wrote:

So, the question is, was this person a REALLY STUPID private detective, or just a gangstalker groupie who decided to go freelance and try to find out information about our personal lives and our assets?

There might be more options.

If the person wanted to try and get information without revealing too much about themselves why wouldn't they phone?
Something else that I wonder about - did this woman know for sure Mark wouldn't be there?

We really don't know the answers to those questions. All we know is that she pretended to be Mark's aunt. For all we know she might have shot him if he had been there. (I'm only half kidding) All we really know is that she was lying to try to get information on Mark/us.

Then, when Mark's boss refused to give her any more information, out of the blue, she said to him something like this, "Do you know if it is possible for someone to transfer the title of their house into someone else's name?"

Whose house? and to whom?

She didn't specify a particular house. This question came out of the blue and I think Mark's boss gave her a WTF look so she dropped it. It seemed, in context, that she was attempting to get information on some house she thought we owned.

That's creepy weird Connie. I hope you'll be able to find out who she was.

The only positive thing about all of this is that one day it will make a great movie! The script is writing itself.

[Blaze Pascal]

. "Do you know if it is possible for someone to transfer the title of their house into someone else's name?"

A threat to be relayed? If so that's extortion, a threat to affect a legal proceeding.

[Narrow Back]

This is deeply disturbing. I hope you find this person and get them thrown into jail.