Peter O'Donnell wrote:I don't think anyone has yet taken in the fact that I am not going to subject myself to this lawfare farce.
My citizenship has to remain invalid under the assumptions of the Ontario Court of Appeal decision. There can be no question of Canadians setting themselves up to determine what my opinions should be. I am the sole arbiter of that process. If this is inconvenient for anyone, I regret that, but I want to make it absolutely clear that I will not be participating in any Canadian lawfare trials voluntarily, and if subjected to force, will remain silent.
This is the approach that should be taken by all conservative bloggers faced with lawfare. Our opinions are not subject to review by a politically correct elite. There can be no discussion or poking around the edges of this principle. If you don't get it, then you don't get freedom of speech. I will not appear anywhere to justify my opinions to anyone.
Something about your post has bothered me for a couple of days now. It is the part about remaining silent.
There seemed to be an element about your plan that felt wrong. Not your decision I don't blame you.
It finally came to me.
If Dr Dawg gets judgement signed against the three of you and Free Dominion then what happens next?
It dosen't matter if the judgement comes about by default or by a loss to a crooked court system.
Let's work our way through the worst case scenario.
The first thing is Dr Dawg and his legal snake wait for payment. They won't wait long.
The second thing that happens is Dr Dawg drags all parties into court for debtor examination. Here was the issue that I couldn't get a grasp on.
You are all COMMANDED by the court to appear with all your financial records, deeds, bank statements, pension info, if you own gold, stamps or art work, ownership info on cars, boats, cottages, land investment- the whole thing.
We live in the information age. You can hide nothing. Numbered Swiss bank accounts are now public. There is no place to hide. All property records are now online and available to one and all. There was a time you could hide assets in your spouses' name. I bet Dawg's legal snake is too sharp to let that go by!
To be forewarned is to be forearmed.
All of you need to sit down with your spouse, if you are married or living common law. This is so so important! Don't fail your spouse if you have one!.
Matrimonial property can be a real problem. Connie, Mark and Peter O'Donald, or whatever your name is, have to look at your assets and liabilities.
Approach the problem this way with your spouse, imagine you are sitting down with your divorce lawyer. What your lawyer can grab from your spouse in a settlement is what Dr Dawg's lawyer will have an interest in.
There is no place to hide save the grave and then the claim goes against your estate.
In the back of my mind was a thread on Richard Warman where he got an old couples' house- I think it worked that way. I believe the lady had recently put the house in both names or something???
The three of you need to sit down with your lawyers and your spouses need to sit down with their lawyers. I read on this site where legals alone could be well north of $200,000.00. What of Dawg's lawyer fees, what he is suing for and any punitive damages.
I am not trying to be a Cassandra prophetess but prepare yourself for the end of this game.
Plan for the worst and hope like h3ll that I am all wrong. I'm just an old man that has no trust whatsoever in our court systems.
These bassturds will even ask you if you expect to receive an inheritance. Nothing is sacred.
It is the type of event that can destroy a marriage!
Just my thoughts for what they are worth.
Don't forget- in November write in Ross Perot.