'Reprehensible' is Not Enough - disband the CHRC/T

[Maikeru]

Recently, MP Irwin Cotler penned a opinion piece in Hoffpost entitled Why 'Reprehensible' is Not Enough.

The article was referenced earlier on FreeDominion in the 'Cotler Ruling coming next week' thread.

The cause that sparked Cotler's outrage and condemnation was a telephone 'poll' in the Mont Royal riding represented by Cotler.

...constituents of mine began reporting that they were receiving telephone calls asking if they would support the Conservative candidate in the pending or imminent by-election...
... ...
herein lies the problem. No Canadian voter should be confronted with false and misleading calls and expected to sort out truth from rumour; indeed, they should not receive such calls in the first place.
... ...
Indeed, unless the Conservatives disagree with the Speaker's finding that such conduct is "reprehensible," they should apologize for their involvement, cease and desist from such calls, and promise never to engage in them again.

Irwin Cotler's tenure as a Canadian MP from 1999 to present is highlighted by his appointment as Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, from Dec 12, 2003 until Feb 5, 2006.

From July 2002 until March 2004, Richard Warman worked for the CHRCommission.
During and after Mr. Warmans employ with the CHRC, he triggered numerous Complaints taken up by the CHRC and heard by the CHRTribunal under the auspices of CHRA Sec 13.1.

Richard Warman is a Master of Law graduate from McGill University, where the 'Human Rights Program' was directed by Law Professor Irwin Cotler from 1973 to 1999.

In 2005, the commission applied for, and got, an interim injunction from the Federal Court ordering Mr. Winnicki to stop spreading hatred on the Internet until the tribunal heard and decided his case.

"That was the first-ever injunction dealing with Internet hate," says Mr. Warman. "It was incredibly rewarding to see the law being advanced by virtue of the cases that I had brought."

What McGill graduate Mr. Warman was boasting about there was the commingling of Federal court litigation - at the time overseen by Justice Minister Irwin Cotler - and CHRC/T Complaints initiated by Richard Warman.

Both Mr. Cotler and Mr. Warman are outspoken activists who publicly rail against anti-semitic rhetoric.

Mr Warman is, quite literally, the poster boy for Sec 13 Complaints, and as such responsible for the period of CHRC/T activity which led to a private MP tabling a Parliamentary Bill to eradicate Sec 13.1.
(Mr. Warman is also responsible for forcing BC's Provincial government passing legislation to prevent vexatious litigation against literature contained in public libraries.)

Richard Warman is the instrument through which Irwin Cotler corrupted the Ministry of Justice in Canada, not only during the period when Cotler was Attorney General, but right up to the very moment Sec 13.1 is expunged from law as a direct result of the CHRC Warman v. Lemire Complaint, first announced in 2004, during Cotler's watch over the Canadian Justice system.

Calling the actions of these two men 'reprehensible' - for corrupting Canada's Justice system in aid of personal activism - is not enough.
Indeed, if the government finds CHRC/T conduct reprehensible, so much so that they extinguish Sec 13.1, they should apologize for their involvement in creating the conditions which led to that action, cease and desist from interfering in Canadian society through bureaucracies created to punish non-criminal behaviour, and promise never to engage in them again.

The precedent has been set by Canada's government after the 'Somalia Affair'. The then Canadian Airborne Regiment was disbanded to ensure that the circumstances which led to 'human rights' abuse by Canadians, in Somalia or elsewhere, would not be repeated.

That solution - disbanding an organization regardless of it's previous good works - is a precedent which should also be applied to the CHRC/T, to ensure that 'human rights' bureaucracies in Canada are never again abused by the actions of persons who use that convenience to further their own ambitions.

Disbanding the CHRC/T would be appropriate. and send the right message out to lawmakers and the media, that Justice in Canada itself is not a concept to be trifled with for personal gain, howevermuch it may be portrayed as for the good of society at large, and echoed as such by adherants to such cause.

[backhoe]

As I noted three years ago, here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1929538/posts?page=597#597

Fire.

Them.

All.

"Close their doors, and open their files..."

The quote is attributed to Mark, but I'd say it myself and add:

Defund.
Follow the money because money is behind it all.
Shine the light of day upon their shady dealings.
Then prosecute them all to the fullest extent of the law.

Pursue it until "human rights" has the same stigma as its close cousin NAZI-ism.

[Edward Kennedy]

Maikeru continues to ne the cause of worry and hand wringing by the real intolerant bigots and his astute observations has comeplled them all to wear diapers so they do not read his minor masterpieces of invective and soil their drawers.

BH continues to perfom the essential rubbing of salt in the wounds of these bigots, and while their screams have been muffled, that does not mean they do not feel the pain...


...and a big salute to these pair

[Maikeru]

Anti-Racist Canada, and the various internet sites which repeat the information published on that site, are an integral element in the corruption of Canada's Justice system associated with Mr. Cotler.

When examined in depth, Anti-Racist Canada will prove to be the undoing of the persons who use that site to disseminate information in cyberspace intended to foster and maintain discrimination against the victims selected for CHRC Complaints triggered by Richard Warman.

Anti-Racist Canada has published five separate articles entitled 'An Examination of Marc Lemire: Part I; Part II; Part III; Part IV; Part V'.
Individually, and in the context of a blog site purportedly giving voice to personal opinion, the first 'examination' may not be construed as any more defamatory than many opinions expressed in cyberspace when alcohol is a factor.
Collectively, however, they indicate an ongoing effort to defame a Canadian involved in legal litigation with the CHRC/T for 8 years.

This leadoff to 'An Examination of Marc Lemire:'Part IV' is intended to insulate the source of the data which follows:

Oh, how we love freedom of information requests which result in information that was wholly unexpected.
... ...
Although we had been content with our efforts regarding Lemire, a recent re-examination of legal documents and evidence used in the Richardson and Kulbashian CHRT decision (found here) has provided us with cause to revisit Lemire’s involvement in organized racism.

[78] On September 28, 2001, Terry Wilson of the London Police Service obtained a warrant to search the apartment of James Richardson. ... At that time Richardson was charged with uttering threats. Evidence gained as a result of this investigation was later used in the CHRT case against Richardson and Kulbashian. This evidence included computers seized during the investigation:

[80] A police crime analyst specializing in electronic evidence was involved in the search operation. He seized a computer found in the apartment, and once back at the police station, made a mirror image of its hard drive and examined its content. Amongst the directories on the drive was one that contained the logs of Internet relay chats in which the user of the computer had participated.

Examination of the transcript which includes [78] and [80] above also includes this paragraph:

[105] In the end, the Crown prosecutor apparently decided to withdraw the criminal charges
against Mr. Richardson and Mr. Kulbashian before going to trial. According to Mr. Wilson, the
Crown concluded that there was no reasonable expectation of conviction on the charges laid
against them.

What occurred there was that a Canadian was arrested, and that person's personal effects and computer seized in a criminal investigation which was dropped prior to court proceedings.

However, information contained on the computer seized was copied and handed off to Richard Warman, then in the process of preparing a CHRC 'hate-speech' Complaint against the Canadian arrested by police.

Despite the fact that the arrest did not lead to a criminal court hearing, CHRTribunal Member Athanasios D. Hadjis allowed the Complainant to refer to the contents found on the computer by 'A police crime analyst specializing in electronic evidence'.

The transcript of the CHRC/T Hearing does not include actual 'chat room' discussions found on the computer.

However, specific content in the computer seized by police on September 28, 2001, eventually appear in an 'Anti-Racist Canada' blog post made on April 16, 2010, which is intended to prove that Marc Lemire was one of the participants in a 'chat room' discussion found therein.

The claim that the 'chat room' discussion was obtained by a 'Freedom of Information' request is true only by virtue of Mr. Warman freely disseminating information he came by as a result of the close cooperation of a law enforcement agency operating on behalf of Canada's government to protect Canadian citizens.

Once posted to Anti-Racist Canada, that same information was syndicated and sent out to other internet sites associated with Anti-Racist Canada, including, but not restricted to: Anti-Racist Action; Antifa.ca; Onepeoplesproject.com; Progressivebloggers.ca; Searchlightmagazine.com; fachowatch.com.

Anti-Racist Canada is the 'third rail' which shows corruption of the Canadian Justice system leading right up to the highest office of government - the Ministry of Justice.

What the CPC government and the current Attorney General Mr. Nicholson inherited from former Attorney General Irwin Cotler, and the Liberal government which appointed the man, is a corrupted bureaucracy operating as a 'human rights' agency, while employing means and methods suited only to totalitarian regimes.

'Human Rights' bureaucracy casts a pall over Canadians who have been cowed to submit to unacceptable behaviour by agencies meant to protect Canadians, but who engage in the sort of actions long associated with bureaucracies such as the East Germany 'Stasi' :

[Edward Kennedy]

Interesting stuff Maikeru, but the big joke to me is that all of these in name only "anti racist" organizations are the most bigotted and hating organizations exsting today.

Like the lieberal establishment, with cooperation of the msm whores and academia kooks, they label(LIBEL) their targets as racists, even if they are not guilty. These anti racist bigots are generally pro aborticide and the worst racist cannot hold a candle to any twisted facsimile of subhuman ant racist bent who enables/supports the torture and murder of an identifiable group in society, innocent unborn babies. This gives rise to the question, if these so called anti racist kooks and hypocrites are in fact as they claim to be, what are the fools and bigots doing discriminating and participating in hate crimes against innocent babies and denying these victims the basis right to life? Huh?

They are not SPEAKING hate alone, they are COMPLICIT IN ACTUAL TORTURE AND MURDER.

By this blatant act of hypocrisy, they are totally demolishing any credibility they may have.

Sickening and disgusting.

[Peter O'Donnell]

I honestly believe that our lawfare strategy should have been, and should now be, to walk out of the process and declare that it is morally bankrupt and without any legal foundation. I suppose that is what will be argued in court. But the problem is, the decision to go into court and argue before a judge who is bound to be limited by his or her membership in Canadian elite society with all its pretensions and foibles, amounts to a de facto acceptance of the moral legitimacy of the other side. This has always troubled me. I do not grant that moral legitimacy. So many awful things have been done to me over a lifetime by this class of Canadians, that I simply do not feel like a Canadian so much as a singularity, an exceptional climate researcher well known in other countries, ignored here in large part because of a vicious blacklisting and defamation campaign begun over thirty years ago.

Nobody has ever done anything about this over a lifetime. That makes my citizenship even less valid. Who am I representing except myself in this matter? There is no shared struggle or perspective. I have never been that comfortable with the politics involved either. My views are different from both sides. But whatever, the deliberate campaign to destroy me has been so massive, so life-altering, that I find a need to take a different course of action against this lawfare and the surreal paradigm represented, that there is some point in prosecuting an individual whose life has already been essentially overturned and from a materialist perspective, destroyed.

Clearly what is missing is any realization of what this means, of how this impacts on Canada's need for counter-revolution against political correctness. I am probably the unknown soldier of this confrontation. But I find that I cannot remain passive and just go along without trying to shift the emphasis to what is more important, the blacklisting of my research and the long-standing attempt to turn me into a non-person, a campaign that has apparently succeeded now with just about everybody except my family and one or two friends. I have massive support for my work in Ireland and the United Kingdom, and even some growing support in the United States. It makes me uncomfortable to be my own publicist, but as nobody has stepped forward, I think it fair to say that I am near the top of my field in climate research.

Yet in Canada, in those circles at least, I am a reviled and despised figure, subject to any form of arbitrary defamation and openly called mentally ill when there is no such diagnosis and no such reality. Just as in Stalinist times, this is a feeble attempt to destroy me by innuendo and not to confront the issues that my research raises (especially in view of how much time and money is being wasted on currently favoured avenues of research). Warman and Baglow represent a second round of the same old attempt to shift blame onto me, and it amounts to a vast case of double jeopardy, if you consider that I was already found "guilty" of not holding Canadian values in the court of liberal public opinion.

Anyway, my resolution for 2012 is to do the best I can, but also to be very open to God's guidance, which at this point, I believe, would have to be along pathways out of rather than into Canadian society. Bearing in mind my advanced age and reduced circumstances, the situation is desperately unfortunate and speaks very, very badly of Canada as a formed or mature national society. Greatness is fleeting and not handed out en masse. Taking a person of substance and turning them into waste product is the exact process of both the holocaust and the gulag.

I hope that in 2012, things will finally be different, that Canadians will investigate what happened over 32 years, what it means, who I really am and not who narrow-minded people say I am, without knowing much about context or substance.

But I am not optimistic. This is a life just about extinguished and used up. And the nativist "thing" works very much against me. I don't think people want me to be a very prominent example of anything other than whatever negative stereotype would work out for their life mission to connect perception to inadequacy.

[Edward Kennedy]

The injustice suffered by you is just another example of things like the Bruce Montague and lInda Gibbons persecution by the spawn of satan and fuels my hatred and anger against lieberalism and their useful idiots.

[Maikeru]

I honestly believe that our lawfare strategy should have been, and should now be, to walk out of the process and declare that it is morally bankrupt and without any legal foundation.

Doug Collins believed that as well...
excerpts:

Did anybody here actually even read the Pardy Vs. Earle decision?

Did you get to the part where he was heard 'in absentia' ?
Did that remind you of your own showy trial, when Doug Collins withdrew from the ring, knowing who would get the Oxcart well before the Academic Award announcement ?

Both Collins and Earle made the same mistake. Figuring that if they showed contempt for a legal process, then everyone else was supposed to also.

Too bad for both of them that these tribunals are indeed fully legislated legal forums. Collins and his lawyer contemptuously hoped to short-circuit the process and do an end-run. That got them nowhere, fast.

Actually, both Collins and Earles paid proper respect to a contemptible, quasi-judicial, process.

Talking about contempt, paragraph 100 of the Abrams v. Collins Judgement, concocted by Tom Patch:
"[100] "As I noted in the introduction to these reasons, issues related to the constitutional validity of the Code were severed from the issues that I have decided in these reasons. I reserve the right to hear and decide those constitutional issues".

Heh. Good one. It's amazing what's possible when folks can make up law as they go along.

Collins sought the right to appeal on Constitutional grounds against the BCHRT engaging in serial hearings of the same person for the same material by the same tribunal.

He was sent to the same tribunal which had upheld the Abrams Complaint, and which thereafter reserved the right to hear Constitutional argument about the right to hear the complaint.

As I said earlier, it was doubletalk that won the day against Doug Collins.

It's really quite fitting that, after suffering months of very public Collins' columns, your dignity and self respect, (not to mention those you claim to be representing), are worth 9% of the dignity and self-respect lost by a drunken homosexual brawler in a few minutes at a XXX comedy venue.

Abrams v Collins was eclipsed by ever more egregious examples of 'human rights hate-speech' persecutions, but that Complaint, when heard, was the moment the Canadian Justice system was corrupted.

[Maikeru]

...injustice... things like the... LInda Gibbons persecution

Linda Gibbons - Winner of the 2011 George Orwell Free Speech Award:

and in other news...

[styky]

Maikeru when the dust settles on all this I hope you put it all in the form of a book and let me be one of the first to order a signed copy. It will be a cherished possession I assure you.

[Maikeru]

Maikeru when the dust settles on all this I hope you put it all in the form of a book and let me be one of the first to order a signed copy. It will be a cherished possession I assure you.

Styky, the cyberbook - 'FreeDominion 451' - is under constant revision, and you are already credited as one of the lead authors.

[styky]

Maikeru when the dust settles on all this I hope you put it all in the form of a book and let me be one of the first to order a signed copy. It will be a cherished possession I assure you.

Styky, the cyberbook - 'FreeDominion 451' - is under constant revision, and you are already credited as one of the lead authors.

Lead Authors!!!! I don't see where I did anything besides dust and sweep occasionally while the owners were busy.

[Lucille]

...injustice... things like the... LInda Gibbons persecution

Linda Gibbons - Winner of the 2011 George Orwell Free Speech Award:

and in other news...

Therein is the insanity of this country, LInda Gibbons is the one who should receive The Order of Canada Award.

However, maybe she's not missing out by not getting the award considering that the likes of David Ahenakew the hate spewing antisemitic, and the Mass murderer Henry Morgentaler received it for their 'evil' deeds.

The irony of Ahenakew's rant is Jews and Native Canadians have the same issues stewing on the 'front' burner which should make them kindred, I would think.

I can't remember what, if anything, the human rights commission dealt out to David Ahenakew for his hate rant or even if it existed back then?

Anybody know?

Anyway, when the Order of Canada award is handed out with the same flippancy of handing out free hockey game tickets or hot-dogs as a promo to visit a car dealership during a sale event, as it seems judging by the two mentioned recipients, then it's a pretty meaningless award.

Worse than that, it comes across to me as an award by the hate filled liebrals given to those who 'action' their evil agenda!

[Lucille]

Edward

Maikeru continues to ne the cause of worry and hand wringing by the real intolerant bigots and his astute observations has comeplled them all to wear diapers so they do not read his minor masterpieces of invective and soil their drawers.

They are not minor masterpieces, Edward, they are major & brilliant masterpieces of truth.

Maikeru is a wonderful person who pours out heart and soul and is totally committed to exposing the corruption of the human rights commission and the corruption of all the players on the opposing side.

[Maikeru]

btw... Re:

Although we had been content with our efforts regarding Lemire, a recent re-examination of legal documents and evidence used in the Richardson and Kulbashian CHRT decision (found here) has provided us with cause to revisit Lemire’s involvement in organized racism

That's one powerful search engine Nosferatu200 has on hand.

On September 28, 2001, Police Detective Terry Wilson seized the computer which yielded up information instrumental in the CHRC/Warman v. Richardson/Kulbashian Complaint proceedings.
On March 10, 2006, Athanasios D. Hadjis rendered his Decision.

On April 16, 2010, Nosferatu200 posted chat room conversations which had been briefly referenced in the Hadjis Decision when recounting the testimony of Police Detective Terry Wilson:

[101] Interestingly, in a relay chat conversation that took place on September 6, 2001, which was recorded on the "fdajews" log found on the computer seized in the London apartment, a participant named "fdajews" asked "wpcanada" (Mr. Richardson) how it was that "Alex" was giving "all these people" web space, post office boxes, and so on.

Possibly, Police Detective Terry Wilson is Nosferatu200, which would explain the ready access to legal documents and evidence from 5-8 years ago.
Possibly, CHRC Counsel Monette Maillet or Valerie Phillips is Nosferatu200, which would explain the ready access to legal documents and evidence from 5-8 years ago.
It's unlikely that either CHRC/T victims Alexan Kulbashian or James Richardson is Nosferatu200.

More 'likely', Richard Warman is playing silly buggers as Nosferatu200, which would explain the re-examination of obscure legal documents and evidence, in turn leading to the online posting of detailed chat room exchanges by "fdajews" - alleged to be Marc Lemire, - to prove his "involvement in organized racism".

That's also 'likely' how Anti-Racist Canada gains such quick access to Warman Affidavits to broadcast online.

Anti-Racist Canada & Richard Warman are joined at the hip, CHRC & Richard Warman are joined at the lip, while Irwin Cotler & Richard Warman are joined at the tip.