These guys are getting more and more funny every day.


Forgive me Connie but they are as funny as a serious case of diarrhea on a trans-Pacific flight. They are stinky and debilitating, but there is nowhere to go to get away. The good news is that eventually they get flushed and I do not mean turn slightly red.Connie Fournier wrote: These guys are getting more and more funny every day.
Red Green wrote:styky wrote:shiva wrote:Alec Bachlow wrote:Racists are always pointing out race- Conservatives never mention race.
Exactly. And socialists are obsessed with money. Funny that.
I just can't help myself![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTrhQd9GHlE
As a pup foster parent, I am outraged that dirtbag outfits like the HSUS is getting donations from people who think they are helping abandoned dogs. We work on a budget of about $0 and save hundreds of dogs every year. Good video for whoever produced it.
FreeDominion is a lightly moderated discussion forum wherein members post/read/discuss various and diverse topics.Nosferatu200 wrote:7 July, 2012
Answering Free Dominion: Part I
When we write an article in which Free Dominion is mentioned, it is often the case that they respond in some way.
'Anti-Racist Canada' has repeatedly mounted threads 'mentioning' FreeDominion since May, 2008.Nosferatu200 wrote:Usually with nasty names with what we could only assume to be spittle flying forth from their mouths in something approaching, though not quite reaching, apoplectic rage.
They don't seem to like us all that much.
Usually we ignore what they write about us, but after reading some of the responses to our article regarding the JDL fundraiser for Free Dominion on the thread, "Anti-Racist Canada member joins FreeDominion - Breaking !!" we felt that it might be useful to address some of what they have said about us. In fact the nature of the responses might necessitate a few different posts on our part.
Connie Fournier wrote:By the way, the only spittle that comes out of my mouth as a result of the idiocy at the ARC is mixed with the coffee that sprays out and hits my monitor from the force of uncontrolled laughter. What a bunch of self-important losers.
Am Ysroel ChaiHarry Abrams wrote:Well here it is about 8:30 am on Sunday morning, and our "friends" at that other blog have already been hard at work. I think they read and consider ARC with greater regularity than most of the rest of us do!
A few more thoughts about Weinstein's JDL and this tragic/comic situation playing out at hand.
As a teenager in Montreal in the late 1960's, my B'nai Brith youth group received a friendly visit from a JDL recruiter/organizer. I don't remember the fellow's name or many particulars, but It was at a time when the FLQ separatist forces were staging violent protests, and blowing up things. People were getting hurt, even killed. Aspects of this nationalist movement were very antisemitic. It made sense to at least listen to what this fellow had to say. Because we all knew that if the police and other regular authorities couldn't control this phenomenon, then it could very well, as history had shown many times, be left to us to defend ourselves as well as we could.
The fellow brought along a few pieces of "street fighting gear." A motorcycle helmet with a darkened face shield, a police-style truncheon. Protective clothing. He seemed a little crazy. We didn't go for it.
Years later, and here in Victoria we made our own local arrangements for citizen night patrols (in touch with police) to protect the synagogue and our Jewish cemetery, after a series of threatening desecrations.
So I approach this issue with respect. To be fair, I think that Weinstein is supporting the Fourniers in this scrap because it's with Bagelow, and only incidental that Fromm has chimed in.
My own view is that this whole thing has been a comedy of compounded errors from day one. Freedom of speech?
No. Hardly the issue. There's a lot of drive-by bad-mouthing that comes off of that Freedo blog. Sometimes it can be directly answered, other times not. Sometimes if you ask Connie nicely enough, she'll fix the problem or at least put your rebuttal alongside whatever stupid remark was made. But sometimes they'll get on their hind feet and "make a stand." Or worse yet.. paint themselves into a very expensive corner. Whatever. I really don't think the Fourniers themselves are racist.
But accepting Christie's "free speech" award, knowing as they had to, that most of its earlier recipients were some very bad actors, was a mistake.
8 July, 2012 10:04 AM
Harry posted several comments on an 'Anti-Racist Canada' thread titled 'Answering Free Dominion: Part I' - including the first, posted 7 hours after the thread was mounted online,Harry Abrams wrote:Well here it is about 8:30 am on Sunday morning, and our "friends" at that other blog have already been hard at work. I think they read and consider ARC with greater regularity than most of the rest of us do!
I note, and I'm sure others will agree, that there's less 'drive-by bad-mouthing' coming off FreeDominion since Harry Abrams' membership was rescinded.Harry Abrams wrote:To be fair, I think that Weinstein is supporting the Fourniers in this scrap because it's with Bagelow, and only incidental that Fromm has chimed in.
My own view is that this whole thing has been a comedy of compounded errors from day one. Freedom of speech?
No. Hardly the issue. There's a lot of drive-by bad-mouthing that comes off of that Freedo blog.
Connie and Mark Fournier host FreeDominion, a 'discussion board' for members who identify with 'Principled Conservatism'.Harry Abrams wrote:Sometimes it can be directly answered, other times not.
Sometimes if you ask Connie nicely enough, she'll fix the problem or at least put your rebuttal alongside whatever stupid remark was made.
But sometimes they'll get on their hind feet and "make a stand."
Or worse yet.. paint themselves into a very expensive corner.
One of the baddest recipients was Journalist Doug Collins.Harry Abrams wrote:Whatever. I really don't think the Fourniers themselves are racist.
But accepting Christie's "free speech" award, knowing as they had to, that most of its earlier recipients were some very bad actors, was a mistake.
Nosferatu200 wrote:
19 July, 2012
Answering Free Dominion: Part II
The way you deal with Nazis is to, “break their heads.”
The JDL fundraiser for Free Dominion took place about a week ago and was attended a who's who of the Canadian right-wing blogosphere as well as some of the more active members of Free Dominion. Prior to this, Connie responded to our last article:
Well, we really don't have to paint the JDL as violent, Connie, since your own membership seem to agree:
Now, our Free Dominion friend here couches the violence of the JDL in more respectable terms; they represent the "warrior race" that is befitting of the Jewish people. Our Free Dominion friend also goes on to claim that the reason why we or anyone else would be concerned about the JDL is because we are closet anti-Semites who want Jews to be powerless in the face of those who would harm them.
It's a ridiculous accusation (especially directed at us) but this is sort of Free Dominion's schtick.
It might be instructive, however, to learn how the JDL earned the honor of being referred to as warriors since the Canadian branch of the JDL has engaged in the very activities that Free Dominion has accused (and condemned) us at ARC of engaging in.
But we begin at the beginning.
The JDL, as we noted in our earlier article, was formed in the late 1960s in response to the real dangers that American Jews were facing in their communities in the United States. The JDL's original rationale was to protect American Jews from the violence (including teaching self-defence skills) they had been subjected to for decades, a goal that we certainly agree with. However from our perspective as people who would use legal means to achieve our goals, the JDL eventually began to engage in violent and illegal activities themselves such as attacks (and voicing support for attacks) on Soviet government and cultural institutions, as well as Soviet citizens, in the United States....
Williamson Daily News - Jan 12, 1971
St. Joseph News-Press - May 11, 1976
Ottawa Citizen - Jan 14, 1980
Reading Eagle - Sep 4, 1981 (first part)
Reading Eagle - Sep 4, 1981 (second part)
The Montreal Gazette - Nov 3, 1984
The Telegraph-Herald - Jan 5, 1986
Record-Journal - Oct 21, 1986
The Milwaukee Journal - Oct 21, 1986
.... and Muslim organizations and individuals:
The Times-News - Jun 17, 1982
Anchorage Daily News - Oct 13, 1985
Lodi News-Sentinel - May 8, 1996 (first part)
Lodi News-Sentinel - May 8, 1996 (second part)
Lodi News-Sentinel - May 8, 1996 (third part)
Herald-Journal - Dec 14, 2001 (first part)
Herald-Journal - Dec 14, 2001 (second part)
Eugene Register-Guard - Feb 1, 2003
It is for these types of attacks that the American government listed the JDL as a terrorist organization. And later, after the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre, KACH was listed as a terrorist organization by the Americans, Israel, European countries, and Canada.
Not that these listings have influenced their supporters views of the JDL or KACH:
But we don't for a moment suspect that attacks on Soviet communists or Arabs/Muslims/PLO really matter all that much to our detractors onFree Dominion. These examples however are really only part of the reason why the JDL has earned the the reputation it has. For you see the JDL members have earned the title as "warriors" not just because of the alleged attacks and/or support for attacks on Soviet and Muslim/Arab targets, but also because they engaged in and encouraged a quite a bit of bonehead smashing in their day (particularly from the early 1970s to the mid 1980s):
The Milwaukee Journal - Jan 31, 1972
The Deseret News - Jan 31, 1972
The Milwaukee Sentinel - Mar 11, 1975 (first part)
The Milwaukee Sentinel - Mar 11, 1975 (second part)
The Telegraph - Apr 15, 1976
The Miami News - Jun 30, 1977
The Southeast Missourian - Nov 8, 1977
The Calgary Herald - Mar 17, 1978
Washington Afro-American - May 30, 1978
The Palm Beach Post - Aug 16, 1985
The Milwaukee Journal - Aug 25, 1985 (first part)
The Milwaukee Journal - Aug 25, 1985 (second part)
The Modesto Bee - Sep 7, 1985 (first part)
The Modesto Bee - Sep 7, 1985 (second part)
Times Daily - Jul 4, 1986 (first part)
Times Daily - Jul 4, 1986 (second part)
The Spokesman-Review - Feb 11, 1998 (first part)
The Spokesman-Review - Feb 11, 1998 (second part)
Let's take a look at some of the direct quotes from these articles:
The way you deal with Nazis is to, “break their heads.”
The Nazi who would, “put me [Kahane] in the gas chamber has no right to free speech… he has no right to live.”
“Nazis have no right to speak or march. If they use their freedoms to deprive other people of their rights, they themselves have no rights.” We actually agree with that statement.
“This [$500.00] is for any Jew or gentile who kills, maims or seriously injures any member of the Nazi party in defence of the Jewish or gentile community,” and “I promise the streets (of Skokie) will be red with Nazi blood. It will not be a peaceful counterprotest.”
Regarding a pipe bomb that took off the foot of an accused Nazi war criminal that also injured his wife and daughter, “The Jewish Defence League is certainly not responsible for the bombing, but we applaud the action.”
“[Kahane] told us, ‘if you see a Nazi don’t try to convince him you’re a nice guy.’ He told us to smash him.”
If you're a reader of this blog, you will know that we have no love for Nazis (original blend or "neo" decaf) or organized racism. However we have always been opposed to the violence that groups like the JDL have engaged in above and have instead chosen to use legal means to fight against racism. In our view, this kind of violence doesn't help the cause. For one thing, society often doesn't view those groups that engage in such violence as any better than those they oppose. From a moral point of view, we're not sure how one could live with one's self if innocent people were harmed.
NOTE: It dawned on us that here might be an appropriate place to list organizations that do use legal means in the fight against discrimination. It isn't an exhaustive list, but these certainly are respectable organizations that do some very good work and should be supported:
* The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs
* Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
* League for Human Rights of B’nai Birth Canada
* Simon Wiesenthal Center
* National Anti-Racism Council of Canada
* African Canadian Legal Clinic
* Canadian Race Relations Foundation
* Northern Alberta Alliance on Race Relations
* Canadian Council of Muslim Women
* Canadian Rainbow Health Coalition
* Egale Canada
* PFLAG Canada
We're sure we missed a lot of good ones, so feel free to let us know what other ones should be added to this list.
But as Harry noted in the comments section of the previous article on this matter, thankfully the Canadian branch of the JDL has not engaged in this kind of violence. That being said, and as we have already mentioned, they have engaged in a lower level of violence, the kind which ARC is routinely accused of engaging in by our friends at Free Dominion
The Fourniers, Kennedy, and others on Free Dominion have accused us of engaging in political violence. At one point Mark claimed that we had been involved in all of the political violence of the past two decades, no mean feat considering most of our membership would have been in junior high at the time we're supposed to have been active. In reality, none of their claims about us is true, however they continue to erroneously promote the idea that we are violent and that the ARA and ARC are the same organization.
But even if we were to look at the violence the ARA is accused of engaging in,Free Dominion really only discuss four incidents (which they attribute to both the ARA and to ARC):
1. The trashing of Heritage Front voice Garry Schipper's home.
2. The stabbing of an anti-racist during an encounter with boneheads.
3. The firebombing of Ernst Zundel's home.
4. The ARA protest outside Paul Fromm's residence.
Regarding the attack on Schipper's residence, Free Dominion does have a legitimate point here, though we aren't sure that any of those arrested were members of the ARA. Such action isn't something that we support though.
On the second incident, what appears to have been a fight between anti-racist and boneheads is being used to justify the attempted murder of one of those anti-racists (that being said, that kind of direct engagement with boneheads isn't something we support or engage in ourselves).
On the third point, this is a claim that has no evidence to support the accusation in the first place.
Finally, the protest near Paulie's home was not violent. No one was assaulted. No threats were made. And from what we understand the protest occurred on public property well away from Paulie's home with police standing between the boneheads who were visiting Paulie (some of whom had criminal records for violence themselves) and the ARA members.
So this, ladies and gentlemen, constitutes the ultraviolent terrorism of Anti-Racist Canada, essentially four incidents that we were not a part of at all.
But if Free Dominion members are to be consistent in their condemnation of such behavior, the might look at similar incidents and threats made by their friend Meir in the past:
Ottawa Citizen - Aug 23, 1986
Calgary (Sunday) Herald - Sep 22, 1986 (first part)
Calgary (Sunday) Herald - Sep 22, 1986 (second part)
Calgary (Sunday) Herald - Sep 22, 1986 (third part)
Ocala Star-Banner - Sep 24, 1986
The Spokesman-Review - Sep 24, 1986
The Leader-Post - Sep 24, 1986
Imagine if it had been a member of ARC who threatened to level the Aryan Nations' camp or took a swing at Terry Long. What do you think the reaction of Free Dominion might be?
You don't have to imagine actually.
How about paying a visit to Jim Keegstra and suggesting that the use of violence, if provoked, wouldn't be ruled out?
The Phoenix - Jul 25, 1985
How would Free Dominion respond if we suggested what Meir suggested?
If we were to suggest that those convicted of hate crimes should be subject to a prison term we would be accused of being, "anti-freedom" scum.
But when the JDL suggests the same remedy....
The Sun - Jul 25, 1985
.... a Free Dominion member will write: These strange bedfellows you speak of share a belief in freedom, something you clearly don't value.
Connie and Mark didn't like the protest that occurred near Paulie`s home? Well then, they will likely be outraged about this happening:
Or perhaps not.
And let's not leave out Ernst Zundel:
The Montreal Gazette - Dec 29, 1983 (first part)
The Montreal Gazette - Dec 29, 1983 (second part)
The Montreal Gazette - Jan 9, 1985
The Phoenix - Jun 6, 1985
The Sun - Jun 6, 1985
The Montreal Gazette - Jun 14, 1985
Ottawa Citizen - Jun 21, 1985
Just to add a little bit of irony to the mix....
Actually, that last post by Mark is even more ironic when you consider this article:
The Jewish Post & News - May 31, 1995 (first part)
The Jewish Post & News - May 31, 1995 (second part)
Meir and Irv hanging out with two members of the ARA at the remains of the Zundel bunker.
Yeah, we think that constitutes irony.
So yes, the Canadian branch of the JDL aren't as anywhere near as bad as the American branch when it comes to engaging in and promoting violence in the past, but they still don't come out smelling like roses.
Look, if Free Dominion wants to celebrate the JDL support for the website and the Fourniers in their legal struggles, that fine, but it sort of an insult to one's intelligence to suggest that the JDL are champions of free speech while at the same time condemning ARC for the very behavior that their friends in the Canadian branch of the JDL have actually engaged in and promoted in the not so distant past.
Let's not pretend this has anything to do with freedom of speech.
Posted by Nosferatu200 at 7:38 PM
Labels: ARA, Connie Fournier, Free Dominion, JDL, Keegstra, Kennedy, Long, Mark Fournier, Meir Weinstein, Paul Fromm, Zundel
Labels:Nosferatu200 wrote:Excerpt:
NOTE: It dawned on us that here might be an appropriate place to list organizations that do use legal means in the fight against discrimination. It isn't an exhaustive list, but these certainly are respectable organizations that do some very good work and should be supported:
* The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs
* Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
* League for Human Rights of B’nai Birth Canada
* Simon Wiesenthal Center
* National Anti-Racism Council of Canada
* African Canadian Legal Clinic
* Canadian Race Relations Foundation
* Northern Alberta Alliance on Race Relations
* Canadian Council of Muslim Women
* Canadian Rainbow Health Coalition
* Egale Canada
* PFLAG Canada
We're sure we missed a lot of good ones, so feel free to let us know what other ones should be added to this list.
Am Ysroel ChaiReturn to Censorship Files - The Blogosphere under attack
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest