nosferatu2000 would be interested in knowing what kind of bully I am. First unlike lieberal ingrates and coweirdos, I do not hide behind anonymous pseudonyms. Second, I have never stalked a woman like an idiot of your organization did in Calgary, nor did I ever harass/defame an innocent defenceless woman. Am I violent? Every air headed lieberal bureaucrat has at one time or another called the police on me and to what effect and for what purpose? The cowards try to intimidate me and shut me down. Did it work? No, it did the opposite and the half has not been told yet.
So the bottom line here, what is my view of violence? For the other side, violence is spitting in the faces of defenceless pro life women and children. I have heard reports about that, and if I ever witness that the perp will see what happens when a man who hates injustice and cowards exercises his right to arrest/subdue and hold the perp for the police, to be charged with assault. Groups of leftist trash screaming and denying freedom of expression does not impress me, nor does a cowardly system wearign badges humor me when instead of arresting the punks in question, they penalize the targetted victims by shutting down the event.
My view of violence is simple. Sane people generally regard violence as criminal insanity, However, when dealing with violent people, I regard violence as a tool. If violence is required in any situation, it is all that will suffice to deal with a bad situation. It is not right or wrong, if one chooses where it is appropriate to utilize it. It is a response mechanism that is legitimate to apply in response to violence against innocent people. It is not to be used in anger...anger and emotion greaty reduces the effective utilization of this tool. Violence need not be a "loose cannon" response to a fool who thinks that he is the only one who can effect injury on an innocent person as in lieberal ara/arc cowards in large numbers attacking a lone target. Like everything else, violence has a proper place and application. There are times when the only recourse to defend life and security of the person is the tool of violence. Violence can be the logical and only response to violence against innocent people, including oneself. It is applied when there is no other option, and it is a legally recognized recourse in such an event of self defense. It is used to disarm, and disable any attacker and there are no rules, no stopping point until the attacker is physically disabled and harmless. Whatever it takes is the only guiding point, and it does not mattter what one has to do to protect himself/herself. It is ugly and brutal, and requires a "do or die" mentality because often that is the result if you fail and better the attacker than you, even if it means the attacker suffers fatal injuries. It means that even if the attacker gives up that you do not until he is incapacitated and unable to harm the target. Being really violent is not easy, and knowing how to seriously injure or even kill someone, in self defense is the easy part...accomplishing that is yet anothe rmatter. Doing is always harder than knowing how to.
When given the unwelcome choice between violence or being hurt, or worse, the only right answer is to be violent and to not only know what to do, but to have the mental ability to get by what you may have to do. Using violence is always legitmate when used as a tool to effect self defence of oneself and/or innocent people.
What ara/arc fools do not realize is that trying to intimidate others could easily get them killed, as almost happened several years ago when a group of these coweirdos outnumbering three youths, six to one, and armed with steel pipes took some serious injuries when the youths pulled their own weapons and proceeded to defend themselves. One ara creep suffered a slashed throat and almost died. What liebereal ara/arc cowards learned here was that if you try to intimidate someone and they come back at you, it is too late in retrospect to withdraw because respondents to violence using violence too late screams at the perps that they have likely engaged a real dangerous foe. After all, a civilized target would back down and run, and anyone who is prepared to fight back is generally bad news. ara/arc fools seem to have not learned this yet, it is not a game they are playing, it is a dangerous activity that could require the services of an undertaker after the fact. That is why I am not a bully, I am more intelligent than that.
I doubt these idiots have considered these things as deeply as I have, and weighed the course of action a lot more people besides me have weighed. Calling or labelling (libeling)someone a bully does not make them one, and more often than not, the defamer is projecting just in essence, what he in reality himself is. What I have stated here is all relative to unarmed violence used against those who would threaten the security of persons. A gun is not needed to defend oneself using violence and would not be my choice except in rebuffing a home invasion mon my property. In that case, I am confident I am mentally prepared, without hesitation to do so effectively.
ara/arc rebels without a cause and tigers without claws should stop their bs before someone gets hurt..or worse.
Please let me know if I said something that offended you. I may want to offend you again sometime.