Canadian Charter of Rights

[Shamus11]

<BR><A HREF=”http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfifteen/id7.html” target=”_new”>Click here to Fix Canada</A>

<div align="center"> <img border=0 src="http://www.gifs.net/animate/a_4racoon.gif" /><BR><BR>



The Charter of Rights

By

James Bredin

The Charter of Rights created a sense of dependency among Canadians. It stipulated that Canadians should depend on their government and appointed Supreme Court for rights and unless these rights were written down in the Charter, they had no rights. Canadians did not demand these rights. They did not even ask for them. You might wonder why the government of the day -- Trudeau and Chretien -- insisted that Canadians should have these rights in writing if they didn't need them and already had them. And Canadians were not allowed a referendum on this overwhelming issue. Quebec refused to sign this Charter. Was there more to this Charter than meets the eye?

The Charter reads:
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
The "Everyone" in (2) does not mean Canadians. It means everyone in the world who can make it to Canada. It now means that as everyone in the world arrives in Canada including terrorists they can claim refugee status and not be questioned about it. They are then entitled to Canadian taxpayer funded welfare and housing and Medicare and dental for themselves and their extended families for the remainder of their lives. The Charter therefore saddled Canadians with the responsibility of supporting everyone in the world including terrorists -- as they arrive in Canada.

There are three types of people who like this: immigration lawyers, government social workers and Liberal international socialists. We have them all in abundance. That is why they put "everyone" instead of every Canadian in the Charter. They prefer to talk about human rights rather than Canadian rights. It is a euphemism that shrouds the multi million-dollar immigration business, the planning ideas of international social engineers and the politics of international socialists. It marries Canada to the UN regardless of which direction the UN goes -- anti US.

Sections (d) gives everyone the right to associate. Does this mean that everyone is compelled to associate? Do people have the right not to associate? Do people have the right not to belong to an association or a union? The Liberals, like the communists in the Soviet Union, want everyone to belong to an organization or a union. They dislike people who are capable of independent thought.

And in the true spirit of international socialism/communism, the Charter does not mention the right of Canadians to own property.

International socialists who appoint judges to the Supreme Court are apt to appoint people who think as they do about international issues rather than Canadian issues. All Canadian prime ministers since Trudeau have been international socialists. None of them have used the notwithstanding clause (Sec 33) of the Charter to interfere with weird Supreme Court decisions. They like to impress the world rather than their fellow Canadians. Canadians as a whole do not vote for their prime ministers so there is no need for a prime minister to impress Canadians -- only control his party. Mulroney tried to be appointed leader at the United Nations after he left office. Chretien tried to have the UN moved to Montreal, even to take over the US so-called debt to the UN while Canada had (still has) a national debt of $576 billion. (One third of all taxes just to pay the interest -- nothing off the principal.)

These Supreme Court judges are charged with interpreting Canadian laws and legal decisions according to what they see in the tea leaves of Charter on that day -- it could be Indian fishing rights or same-sex marriages. These Supreme Court judges who were appointed for life (Until they turn 75 or die) by international socialists, interpret Canadian legal decisions according to an international Charter which was written for everyone in the world by international socialists. And these Supreme Court appointees cannot be questioned about their prejudices -- feminism, homosexuality or prisoners rights -- before they take their seats on the bench or after their crazy decisions.

Democracies that depend on a Charter or a written dogma are less democratic. There is no need for public debate. Decisions are made by appointed-for-life judges and outweigh decisions made by elected parliamentarians. We then get strange decisions about kiddie porn and centuries-old Indian treaties and the definition of spouse. And we have international socialists in Ottawa who refuse to use the notwithstanding clause to control it. Public opinion has no input as Canadians step closer to judicial dictatorship. Dictatorships do not happen overnight. It is a slow progression from democracy to completely obedient citizens. It happened before in many great countries. It is happening again. Those who turn themselves into sheep, according to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, are liable to be eaten by the wolves. He should have known. He spent a long time in the Gulag.

Unless Canadians change the Charter or cancel it completely, this creeping form of international socialism and creeping dictatorship will grow and grow until Canada is no longer recognized as Canada. We will be known as the socialist dictatorship that was once known as Canada. Fix Canada.

Friday, June 27, 2003

<BR><A HREF=”http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfifteen/id7.html” target=”_new”>Click here to Fix Canada</A>

[LondonLady]

Since when I clicked on the link it said URL NOT FOUND does this mean Canada is unfixable?????

[lethbridge_east]

No LL just a bad link:
http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/&#822 ... /id7.html&#8221; is what he put when he actually meant...

http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfour/id17.html

Like Zo

[matti]

The "Everyone" in (2) does not mean Canadians. It means everyone in the world who can make it to Canada. It now means that as everyone in the world arrives in Canada including terrorists they can claim refugee status and not be questioned about it. They are then entitled to Canadian taxpayer funded welfare and housing and Medicare and dental for themselves and their extended families for the remainder of their lives. The Charter therefore saddled Canadians with the responsibility of supporting everyone in the world including terrorists -- as they arrive in Canada.

Trust me...the "everyone" excludes Aussies ! When living there, (with my Canadian born husband...who incidently paid a fortune in taxes!) I couldnt get my daughter into school until she got her permanent residency...yet....I had to watch as refugees got admitted straight away. Hence, I returned to Oz after 18mnths of bashing my head against a brick wall. Your education dept even suggested I send her over the border into the US to attend school. I approached the Aust embassey who informed me this was quite common. Upon my return I had to have a chuckle at some information I found out. If I had simply said I was from a Pacific Island, I would have been able to claim refugee privilages. Last time I looked....Australia WAS a Pacific Island !

I hope the Cretins nobel peace prize looks good next to Arafats !


Mat