George W. Bush is a Slow-Witted Liar and I Hate Him!

[Dogpatch]

(spoof)

George W. Bush is a Slow-Witted Liar and I Hate Him!
Commissarka Pinkie
7/30/2011, 6:04 pm

My fellow comrades:

As the subject line indicates, George W. Bush is a slow-witted liar. And I hate him. He is so slow-witted that on September 11, 2001, it took him seven whole minutes to realize what he should have known already, since he was in on the conspiracy—that planes had flown into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.

You’d think that he couldn’t get any more slow-witted than that, but no. Look at how long it took him to come up with an explanation—and a pretty lame one at that—for why he just sat there for seven minutes like the creeping slug he is, trail of slime and all . . .

Almost ten years!

Ten years to come up with a half-baked, half-assed, half-witted lie—jeez, you’d think someone who lies as much as he does would at least be good at it—in desperate hope of covering up his unprecedented stupidity. You’d think there could be no greater testimony than this to his unparalleled ignorance and inimitable ineptitude, but I’m sure there are such testimonies and rest assured they are legion.

Read this, if you dare, and I will dare you not to puke:

http://news.yahoo.com/bush-explains-slo ... 50794.html

«Former President George W. Bushsays his apparent lack of reaction to the first news of the September 11 2001 attacks was a conscious decision to project an aura of calm in a crisis.

Apparent? How about obvious? How about blatant? And conscious? When has he ever been conscious of anything? I have drunks on the floor of my hovel more aware of what’s going on than he ever was. And that’s after I bash their brains in with my shovel.

But still Bush lies, while thousands die:

«My first reaction was anger. Who the hell would do that to America? Then I immediately focused on the children, and the contrast between the attack and the innocence of children," Bush says in an excerpt of the interview shown to television writers on Thursday.

Ha! Like he never knew who the hell would do something like that to America! He orchestrated the whole thing and then tried to blame it on the Religion of Peace, so he could have an excuse to pound them into the sand and steal their oil the way he stole the presidency—just like he stole from the government by giving tax cuts to his fat cat billionaire and millionaire cronies, and corporate jet owners (who should never be confused with billionaires and millionaires, but are just as evil), and to junior senators from Illinois who didn’t need them and never asked for them. The nerve of Bush, forcing decent American citizens to take stuff they don’t need and never asked for. And since when did he ever care about the children?

But wait, there’s more . . .

«Bush said he quickly realized that a lot of people beyond the classroom would be watching for his reaction.

Can you believe his narcissism? (Oh yes, stupid incompetents can be narcissistic, too!) Instead of thinking about the children, or the thousands he’d just killed, or all the destruction he’d wrought so far and the destruction he had yet to wreak, what was he thinking about? How he looked! What people might think about him, or say about him! The world is falling to pieces all around him, and all he can do is sit there and wonder if his fly is open. Or maybe not, since stupid people tend to be oblivious to open flies.

But the narcissism doesn’t stop there. Just look at how many times he says “I” in this statement:

« "So I made the decision not to jump up immediately and leave the classroom. I didn't want to rattle the kids. I wanted to project a sense of calm," he said of his decision to remain seated and silent.

Oh, baloney. He simply didn’t know what he should do, except sit there looking as if he’s above the fray. Talk about a failure of leadership. Talk about incompetence. Talk about not being able to handle that phone ringing at 3 in the morning, even if it was just after 9.

«Executive producer and director Peter Schnall said Bush, who has adopted a low public profile since leaving office in January 2009, brought no notes to the interview.

Obviously Mr. Schnall didn’t check the palms of Bush’s hands. Everyone knows that’s where stupid people write their notes.

«"What you hear is the personal story of a man who also happened to be our president.
Listening to him describe how he grappled with a sense of anger and frustration coupled with his personal mandate to lead our country through this devastating attack was incredibly powerful," Schnall said.

Why, this is nothing but shameless right-wing propaganda! He did not happen to be our president! He stole to be president of a bunch of right wing loons. Where does Schnall—whose name sounds suspiciously German and ergo Nazi to me—but where does he get off saying that Bush had a mandate?

I don’t believe any of this, comrades. To believe it would require me to accept that maybe George W. Bush once told the truth. That maybe he cares, even if he doesn’t care as much as I do. That maybe he isn’t the vilest, most depraved clump of cells ever to multiply in the swamp from whence he surely emerged.

No, he had some other reason for just sitting there, and the only possible explanation is that he was too stupid to know what to do.

Now, if anyone has any dumber ideas about why he just sat there, I’d like to hear them.

Commissarka Pinkie is a regular contributor to The People’s Cube, and is renowned and admired by the masses for her dedication to raising awareness of how much she cares. When she isn’t busy making an issue out of everything, she likes to unwind by beating proles with her shovel, spending other people’s money, and indulging her Obamaphilia with Obamabilia until she’s Obamabilious.

The People's Cube

[RedDog]

Right. Yale. Harvard. Jet Pilot. Ball team owner. State Governor. 2 term President. A regular retard.

[Gerry T. Neal]

I never liked George W. Bush very much, although I tried to initially for the sake of some Christian friends who had been supporters of him during his first campaign for the U. S. Presidency. By the end of September 2001 I loathed the man. One of the first responses of the Bush administration to the terrorist attack on the United States was to push a piece of legislation through Congress that enhanced the powers of the executive branch of the US government, ostensibly for security purposes, to help them prevent future attacks of this nature from occurring.

The problem was, I remembered that someone else had tried to pass that exact kind of legislation half a decade previously. That person was Bill Clinton and the occasion he had used to introduce anti-terrorist security legislation was the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. The Republicans in Congress killed the bill and I remember well what conservative commentators were saying about it at the time. One conservative commentator wrote an article explaining that such legislation was the wrong approach, that the government had all the power that it needed to deal with terrorism, and that an enhancement of government powers would be a threat to the liberty of the average American. The commentator in question was John Aschcroft, at the time the Senator for Missouri. In September of 2001 he, as George W. Bush's first Attorney General, was a key figure in having the USA PATRIOT Act rushed through Congress. Rush Limbaugh and countless others who had condemned Clinton's proposed terrorist legislation as a power-grab that would lead to the tyranny of a police state sang a completely different tune in September 2001.

The lyrics to the tune were "But it's cute when I do it".

What these individuals were doing was placing their party ahead of their principles. That is a repulsive characteristic and I have never been able to respect these people the same ever since. Placing party ahead of principle is a completely different thing from putting loyalties to people ahead of ideals. The duty of filial piety towards one's parents, love for one's spouse and children, and the bonds of brotherhood and friendship, should all have more influence on a person's actions than cold, rationally thought out, ideals. That in and of itself is a principle. Principles are not ideals. They are personal standards of conduct that a person absorbs from the culture and tradition of his family, community, and society from earliest childhood and are much deeper, more important, and lasting than ideals. Abandoning your ideals is a step towards maturity. Abandoning your principles is a step towards selling your soul to the devil.

A few years later just after the invasion of Iraq I was talking with some friends and the subject of politics came up. I was asked my opinion of the Bush Presidency and I gave a rather negative assessment. The Bush administration consisted of power-crazed people who had taken advantage of their own people's exposed vulnerability in 2001 to enhance their own powers and start a string of expensive and unnecessary wars that would make the United States the shortest lived empire in the history of mankind. One of my friends, an American liberal, had applauded everything I said. Until, that is, I was asked who I would have voted for in 2000 had I been an American instead of a Canadian. I didn't have to think hard about that one and immediately said "Pat Buchanan". At that point the conversation began to go in a rather different direction.

[Red Green]

Good observations Mr. Neal and quite eloquently expressed.

[Dogpatch]

"By the end of September 2001 I loathed the man. One of the first responses of the Bush administration to the terrorist attack on the United States was to push a piece of legislation through Congress that enhanced the powers of the executive branch of the US government" ...

and

"A few years later just after the invasion of Iraq I was talking with some friends and the subject of politics came up. I was asked my opinion of the Bush Presidency and I gave a rather negative assessment"

GTN - It seems to me that you're just splitting hairs

[Gerry T. Neal]

GTN - It seems to me that you're just splitting hairs

Perhaps. But either Ashcroft and Limbaugh were right in 1995 and wrong in 2001, or they were wrong in 1995 and right in 2001. I incline towards the first position myself.

Here is what the late, great Sam Francis had to say about the Patriot Act back in September of 2003:

http://www.vdare.com/francis/habits_of_freedom.htm

Note especially the following:

But the larger point is not what this administration does or doesn't do with the new powers.

The point is that the powers are far larger than the government of any free people should have and that whatever powers this administration doesn't use could still be used by future ones.

[Red Green]

GTN - It seems to me that you're just splitting hairs

Perhaps. But either Ashcroft and Limbaugh were right in 1995 and wrong in 2001, or they were wrong in 1995 and right in 2001. I incline towards the first position myself.

Here is what the late, great Sam Francis had to say about the Patriot Act back in September of 2003:

http://www.vdare.com/francis/habits_of_freedom.htm

Note especially the following:

But the larger point is not what this administration does or doesn't do with the new powers.

The point is that the powers are far larger than the government of any free people should have and that whatever powers this administration doesn't use could still be used by future ones.

Penn Jillette made the same argument. Even if you believe that the current occupant of the WH is the most honorable, smart and wise man that has ever walked the face of the earth, at some time as a matter of inevitability there will be someone else occupying that spot who may be less than the current occupant and that is why everyone should oppose the PA.

[Gerry T. Neal]

Penn Jillette made the same argument. Even if you believe that the current occupant of the WH is the most honorable, smart and wise man that has ever walked the face of the earth, at some time as a matter of inevitability there will be someone else occupying that spot who may be less than the current occupant and that is why everyone should oppose the PA.

When we consider who actually succeeded Bush into the White House and some of the ways in which Homeland Security has been used since, the argument becomes irrefutable. It was, of course, irrefutable at the time it was first made too. People just didn't want to hear it then.

[Red Green]

Penn Jillette made the same argument. Even if you believe that the current occupant of the WH is the most honorable, smart and wise man that has ever walked the face of the earth, at some time as a matter of inevitability there will be someone else occupying that spot who may be less than the current occupant and that is why everyone should oppose the PA.

When we consider who actually succeeded Bush into the White House and some of the ways in which Homeland Security has been used since, the argument becomes irrefutable. It was, of course, irrefutable at the time it was first made too. People just didn't want to hear it then.

Precisely. I saw an article I should track down and post up on how the Norwegians, in the aftermath of there most recent episode of political violence and mass-murder, have rejected any calls to become a police state.

Apparently the Nordic temperament is such that they are not quick to make hasty, broad decisions in light of unspeakable tragedy. It's too bad we don't have such fortitude on this continent. If Dubya Bush was right and they attacked us because they hated our freedoms, then he was quick to remove the very thing they hated, thereby becoming the Country's most prominent "Islamist appeaser".

[Dogpatch]

GTN and RG

Thank you - I understand a bit more

[DA_Champion]

Right. Yale. Harvard. Jet Pilot. Ball team owner. State Governor. 2 term President. A regular retard.

How about Obama?

Columbia. Harvard. Corporate Lawyer. University of Chicago professor. State senator. Federal Senator. President.

[Dogpatch]

Right. Yale. Harvard. Jet Pilot. Ball team owner. State Governor. 2 term President. A regular retard.

How about Obama?

Columbia. Harvard. Corporate Lawyer. University of Chicago professor. State senator. Federal Senator. President.

Worst Prez Ever

[DA_Champion]

Agreed,

Which shows that we shouldn't be superficial like Red Dog when evaluating resumes.

[Dogpatch]

Yeah, that sums up the Big O

[RedDog]

Obama has never followed through and completed anything. Half a term of anything does not a label make. He's a "community" builder by his own definition. He's a drifter and a moocher public servant. A black Jack Layton if you will who has never employed anyone or produced anything nor served up any military service.