concan wrote:What's French for surrender?
Rear view mirror.
doctorftf wrote:
Am i the only person who thinks its about time for our own civil war?
Mr. Valentine wrote:EdS, recognizing Quebecers as a nation does not imply that other groups are not a nation, nor does it imply the necessity to define them.
It is therefore not a problematic thing to do as you suggest, particularly since it was a response to a Bloc motion, and brought a federalist consensus about.
Am Ysroel ChaiEdS wrote:Mr. Valentine wrote:EdS, recognizing Quebecers as a nation does not imply that other groups are not a nation, nor does it imply the necessity to define them.
It is therefore not a problematic thing to do as you suggest, particularly since it was a response to a Bloc motion, and brought a federalist consensus about.
Which "Quebecers" are you referring to? Only French Quebecois? Or all Quebecois? Does that include the fiercely federalist Jewish Quebecers? The fiercely federalist Italians of Montreal?
Are we all nations then? What happened to Canadian unity?
freedominoes wrote:EdS wrote:Mr. Valentine wrote:EdS, recognizing Quebecers as a nation does not imply that other groups are not a nation, nor does it imply the necessity to define them.
It is therefore not a problematic thing to do as you suggest, particularly since it was a response to a Bloc motion, and brought a federalist consensus about.
Which "Quebecers" are you referring to? Only French Quebecois? Or all Quebecois? Does that include the fiercely federalist Jewish Quebecers? The fiercely federalist Italians of Montreal?
Are we all nations then? What happened to Canadian unity?
Those Jews, Italians and the other immigrants the liberals brought in are foreign occupiers brought in to force Quebec (electorally) to stay in the country. F them. If I was the PQ, I wouldn't even recognize their votes. They can pack their sh!t and leave if they don't want to live in an independant Quebec. That goes double for Alberta.
freedominoes wrote:EdS wrote:Mr. Valentine wrote:EdS, recognizing Quebecers as a nation does not imply that other groups are not a nation, nor does it imply the necessity to define them.
It is therefore not a problematic thing to do as you suggest, particularly since it was a response to a Bloc motion, and brought a federalist consensus about.
Which "Quebecers" are you referring to? Only French Quebecois? Or all Quebecois? Does that include the fiercely federalist Jewish Quebecers? The fiercely federalist Italians of Montreal?
Are we all nations then? What happened to Canadian unity?
Those Jews, Italians and the other immigrants the liberals brought in are foreign occupiers brought in to force Quebec (electorally) to stay in the country. F them. If I was the PQ, I wouldn't even recognize their votes. They can pack their sh!t and leave if they don't want to live in an independant Quebec. That goes double for Alberta.
doctorftf wrote:Sadly,your probably right.We just seem to sit back and take everything.I've reached my limit,but i could be alone.Zip.com wrote:doctorftf wrote:Am i the only person who thinks its about time for our own civil war?How else do we get rid of Quebec before they destroy the entire nation?Step by step they are taking over the country.Its pretty disgusting if you asked me.They(Quebec & Ottawa) are laughing all the way to the bank.Roy Wilson wrote:concan wrote:Roy Wilson wrote:As a nation will Quebec have its own army? Oh sorry I forgot .![]()
![]()
![]()
What's French for surrender?
Je suis le français![]()
![]()
There will never be a civil war against the French. You haven't paid attention to the passivity of the average Canadian.
Canadians do not feel the French are that much of a threat. Not until they actually do something, like separate, will the English side of Canada sit up and say "Oh, did they actually do it?"
I've never seen very much passion for anything, Canadians are sleeping lemmings.
muncher wrote:freedominoes wrote:EdS wrote:Mr. Valentine wrote:EdS, recognizing Quebecers as a nation does not imply that other groups are not a nation, nor does it imply the necessity to define them.
It is therefore not a problematic thing to do as you suggest, particularly since it was a response to a Bloc motion, and brought a federalist consensus about.
Which "Quebecers" are you referring to? Only French Quebecois? Or all Quebecois? Does that include the fiercely federalist Jewish Quebecers? The fiercely federalist Italians of Montreal?
Are we all nations then? What happened to Canadian unity?
Those Jews, Italians and the other immigrants the liberals brought in are foreign occupiers brought in to force Quebec (electorally) to stay in the country. F them. If I was the PQ, I wouldn't even recognize their votes. They can pack their sh!t and leave if they don't want to live in an independant Quebec. That goes double for Alberta.
This is the most intelligent post i saw in a long long time.......for a baboon.
freedominoes wrote:EdS wrote:Mr. Valentine wrote:EdS, recognizing Quebecers as a nation does not imply that other groups are not a nation, nor does it imply the necessity to define them.
It is therefore not a problematic thing to do as you suggest, particularly since it was a response to a Bloc motion, and brought a federalist consensus about.
Which "Quebecers" are you referring to? Only French Quebecois? Or all Quebecois? Does that include the fiercely federalist Jewish Quebecers? The fiercely federalist Italians of Montreal?
Are we all nations then? What happened to Canadian unity?
Those Jews, Italians and the other immigrants the liberals brought in are foreign occupiers brought in to force Quebec (electorally) to stay in the country. F them. If I was the PQ, I wouldn't even recognize their votes. They can pack their sh!t and leave if they don't want to live in an independant Quebec. That goes double for Alberta.
Dave from Alberta wrote:If I had to drug test only one of you two, freedominoes would get my vote hands down.
Return to National Forum on Official Bilingualism
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest