Global warming? Do the math

[styky]

[Dacre]

Can't be true Styky. This chart was paid for by big oil and other heritics. If they aren't with the consensus they aren't credible. I can't wait to see the egg on the face and humiliation when this fraud is put to bed once and for all.

[Brown envelope]

Can't be true Styky. This chart was paid for by big oil and other heritics. If they aren't with the consensus they aren't credible.

[DA_Champion]

It would be easier to take that graph seriously if it had actual numbers along the ordinate. They don't, and hence it's not a real graph. They do however keep track of major biblical events. They have the number 75 written below, but there's nothing in the graph which adds up to 75.

[Brown envelope]

It would be easier to take that graph seriously if it had actual numbers along the ordinate. They don't, and hence it's not a real graph.

That's your opinion.

[styky]

It would be easier to take that graph seriously if it had actual numbers along the ordinate. They don't, and hence it's not a real graph. They do however keep track of major biblical events. They have the number 75 written below, but there's nothing in the graph which adds up to 75.

It's all against your religion isn't it. All praise the state of Global Warming. Admiting that it's all a big hoax would be admiting that you worship nothing.

[DA_Champion]

It would be easier to take that graph seriously if it had actual numbers along the ordinate. They don't, and hence it's not a real graph.

That's your opinion.

If I tell you 1+1=2, you may respond with some tripe about opinion as well. But it'll be just that, tripe. The bottom line is that's how the number 2 is defined.

Standard convention. You need to label the abscissa and ordinate. If you don't believe me, which is your right, go on the website of any real scientific journal and read their submission criteria. Another aspect which I didn't mention is that they lack error information - though sometimes that's allowed to slide.

Here's an example of a "plot".

[DA_Champion]

It would be easier to take that graph seriously if it had actual numbers along the ordinate. They don't, and hence it's not a real graph. They do however keep track of major biblical events. They have the number 75 written below, but there's nothing in the graph which adds up to 75.

It's all against your religion isn't it. All praise the state of Global Warming. Admiting that it's all a big hoax would be admiting that you worship nothing.

I don't consider basic science to be a religion.

[Brown envelope]

Standard convention. You need to label the abscissa and ordinate.

If an Ogive could speak, it would disagree,

[DA_Champion]

Standard convention. You need to label the abscissa and ordinate.

If an Ogive could speak, it would disgaree,

Thanks for teaching me a new word.

[Brown envelope]

No problem.

[Dacre]

I tell you I just can't wait.

[fourhorses]

[CdnRepublican]

Norse goddess Hel was queen of the frozen underworld. Hell is cold, not hot.

I look forward to seeing AlWhore there in his icy stupidity;

[bluecon]

It would be easier to take that graph seriously if it had actual numbers along the ordinate. They don't, and hence it's not a real graph. They do however keep track of major biblical events. They have the number 75 written below, but there's nothing in the graph which adds up to 75.

It's all against your religion isn't it. All praise the state of Global Warming. Admiting that it's all a big hoax would be admiting that you worship nothing.

I don't consider basic science to be a religion.

1% milk is going to kill us, is what they pass off as science in todays academic world. Note:the scientists who came up with that theory are in no way comparable to the scientists that invented the atomic bomb.