Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Examining the use of 'environmentalism' as a means to power.

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 11/ 27/ 11 6:34 pm

http://minx.cc/?post=324129

Crony Socialists Unite To Save the Planet. Or Something.

The Climategate 2.0 emails are proving to be a treasure trove of confirmatory evidence for things we "deniers" have long suspected known.

Ace beat me to the punch on the BBC story (that used to be the first part of this post). But is finding the media aligned with a lefty pet cause really that shocking?

What may be more surprising to some, however, is the participation of big business in this scam. On the surface, it would seem that they'd be staunchly in opposition since they frequently find themselves in the crosshairs of anti-CO2 measures like Kyoto. But not so much.

One of the major themes of The Hague was the
continued evolution of private sector initiative in advancing both the
policy and reality of market mechanisms. Some of the best-attended of COP6
side events were those which brought together industry panels to discuss
actions and opportunities to get out in front and make these emerging
markets work. Traders are trading; buyers & sellers are buying & selling;
and companies/accountants are looking systematically at how to standardize
documentation to facilitate those market activities. It is all happening
in spite of the lack of concrete action defining a global framework. It is
the private sector gearing up to seize the moment as government regulators
find themselves both challenged by the magnitude of their emission
reduction task and tantalized by the possibility of harnessing global
markets to advance to that end. (emphasis added)


Ah yes, the private sector and government joining forces to give us all a good screwing. Tantalizing indeed, if you're one of the beneficiaries.

Who wrote this, you ask? H/t to a commenter at Watts Up With That?:

THOMAS R. JACOB

Government Affairs Manager, Western Region

DuPont Company

Tom Jacob is responsible for DuPont’s relations with state governments of California and the other Western states. He manages legislative and other activities from a newly established office in Sacramento. His responsibilities extend across the spectrum of DuPont’s science-based business interests. Prior to returning to California in late 2005, Tom spent the previous decade managing DuPont’s involvement with environment-related intergovernmental negotiations, ranging from the World Trade Organization to the World Summit on Sustainable Development. This has included extensive direct involvement with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and various chemicals-related treaties and negotiations.

Tom began his DuPont career with the Economics & Policy Division of its
former petroleum subsidiary, Conoco…. http://www.cicc.org/pdf/Jacob_bio.pdf (emphasis added)


DuPont is one of many companies that has engaged in the process of "greenwashing" its business. They're not an eeeevillll, polluting chemical company anymore, and they spun off that icky Remington Arms Co. nearly 20 years ago. Now they're a trusted steward of Gaia, contributing to environmental causes and committed to saving the planet. I mean, they still make all those chemicals ... but they do it with a heart.

And DuPont is a master at this. Back when the ozone hole was the new hotness, guess who was arguing in support of the Montreal Protocol that banned Freon, among other CFCs? As luck would have it, DuPont just happened to have a replacement waiting in the wings.

A good list of fellow bullshit artists can be found here: U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP).

I actually don't mind greenwashing much. It's just PR spin, and isn't much different than any other positioning that companies do. But USCAP is greenwashing on steroids. Rather than just polishing up their image for the public, member companies joined together with enviro-nut groups like the NRDC to advocate for climate change legislation.

We know the cost of such legislation would run into the trillions of dollars, so why would they do such a thing? Because those trillions come out of your pocket, with many finding a home in theirs, that's why.

They see an artificial market opportunity just like DuPont did with its Freon replacement. Why compete in the free market when you can have government put its heavy thumb on the scale?

But something happened on the way to the cash register. The cratering of the economy made the public's concern about an entirely different kind of green front and center. And despite the "nothing to see here, move along" stance of the organizations involved in Climategate, blind trust in consensus science has passed its peak.

Why, it's almost enough to make a greenie politician begin to rethink this thing:

Steve Hilton, [U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron's] director of strategy and ‘green guru’, is the latest person to admit to doubts about climate change.

‘I’m not sure I believe in it,’ he announced at a meeting of the Energy Department, prompting one aide to blurt out: ‘Did I just hear that correctly?’


Posted by: Andy at 05:15 PM

3 1. Develop freon and make a ship load of money.

2. Just before the patent on freon runs out, create junk science that claims it's bad for the environment. Now no one's making money off the product you developed.

3. Viola! Develop the replacement for freon that has a nice fresh patent and start making money again.

That's how you do it, bitches.

Love and kisses,

DuPont
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 12/ 03/ 11 6:59 pm

http://minx.cc/?post=324321

Climategate 2.0 Roundup

The Climategate 2.0 emails continue to produce some really great examples of scientists, or maybe that should be "scientists", behaving badly. There's so much, in fact, that it's hard to pick ones to excerpt. "Target rich environment" is an understatement.

Anthony Watts has two excellent summary threads (here and here)
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/22/climategate-2-0/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/30/climategate-2-0-emails-thread-2/
that chronicle the discoveries coming out of this latest batch of over 5,000 email messages. And, as always, Steve McIntyre's Climate Audit
http://climateaudit.orga
an indispensable resource. (Aside: If I were president, my first executive order would be to turn over to McIntyre every shred of climate research ever conducted on behalf of the taxpayer. Not sure we're going to get that from AGW believer-of-convenience Mitt or couch-sittin' Newt).

What strikes me as most interesting about the emails is how focused the coterie of warmist scientists are on keeping any dissenting papers from seeing the light of day. Other scientists and journal reviewers are fair game if it looks like they're not devoted to "the cause".

And of course this makes sense, given that the entire AGW scam relies on Consensus Science™. The declines have to be hidden and the data can't be questioned because shut up.

Here's just one example. Pat Michaels at Cato is a thorn in their side, so they tried to have his PhD stripped. Michaels turns the tables:

The revoking of my doctorate, the clear objective of Tom’s email, is the professional equivalent of the death penalty. I think it needs to be brought to your attention, because the basic premise underlying his machinations is patently and completely false. Dr Wigley is known as a careful scientist, but he certainly was careless here.


Unconvinced scientists need not apply. There's a consensus to be manufactured, don't you know.

Until the science is conducted out in the open, the claims of the warmists can't be taken seriously. It's as simple as that.

11 The thing that most people are taking away from CG 2.0 is that there are a core group of these fraudsters who are running the whole show and stifling any deviation from their agenda.
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 12/ 28/ 11 5:56 am

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/

“YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF:” Don Surber vs. Amory Lovins. “Climategate proved climatology is fraud. If it were true, the proof would be easy picking and scientists would not have to manipulate data and dodge Freedom of Information requests.” See, once you start lying and fudging data, it’s hard to wrap yourself in the mantle of science.

Posted at 10:13 pm by Glenn Reynolds http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/48604

Yep- "epic fraud..."

We are all "carbon based..."

So how's that "sequestering" and "credits" foolishness workin' out for ya?

Clowns...
Fools...
Goofs...
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 01/ 07/ 12 5:26 pm

HT Maggie's Farm:

Amanda Carey: Green Movement Dead In The Water

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/01/06/amanda-carey-green-movement-dead-in-the-water/

Be sure to read the comments, viz

HuskerHomer says:

In addition, most people think that we’ve already cleaned up the environment by huge amounts, which we have. Rivers are cleaner, air is cleaner, lakes are cleaner. The public supported the enviros in the past because the pollution was clearly present and it was clear that things had to change.

Now, all we have are ridiculous claims that the world will burn up in 50-100 years. The Greens have changed “global warming” to “carbon pollutIon” in the hopes of repeating their past successes, but the population has become much more wary of the Greens due to their outrageous claims, in addition to finding out that many “green” ideas have either been counterproductive (ethanol, anyone?) or misguided. Plus, the hypocrisy of the Green leaders makes it clear that they only want to make life more difficult for the masses, not themselves. The public thus now correctly views the Greens as just another lobbying group that is in it for themselves and not for the public at large, and the public rightfully looks upon them with suspicion and disdain. Yes, many of the public still live in the fantasy world that the Greens are just doing what is best for everyone, including the middle class, but most are becoming more educated about just what the “Green agenda” will mean: higher prices, higher taxes, fewer jobs, more restrictions. Most people look around and say, we’ve reached a nice balance between economic growth and public health, and spending more for “pollution control” just isn’t worth it.
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 01/ 07/ 12 5:44 pm

Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 07/ 30/ 12 12:37 am

http://minx.cc/?post=331426

Conclusive Proof Of Manmade Global Warming

Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past ~ George Orwell

We "skeptics" have suspected for a long time that most Global Warming™ is indeed manmade.

No, not in the sense that there's an actual increase in the Earth's temperature from human production of so-called greenhouse gases that's discernible from otherwise natural temperature variations. But in the sense that temperature and other data is tortured by AGW-believing "scientists" until it tells them what they want to hear.

This is how Michael Mann erased the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, and it's how every year becomes one of the hottest years ever measured.

Today Anthony Watts and coauthors released a paper quantifying the impact of station quality issues and NOAA data adjustments on the USHCN temperature records that are one of the most important books in the warmists' bible:

A reanalysis of U.S. surface station temperatures has been performed using the recently WMO-approved Siting Classification System devised by METEO-France’s Michel Leroy. The new siting classification more accurately characterizes the quality of the location in terms of monitoring long-term spatially representative surface temperature trends. The new analysis demonstrates that reported 1979-2008 U.S. temperature trends are spuriously doubled, with 92% of that over-estimation resulting from erroneous NOAA adjustments of well-sited stations upward. (emphasis added)

Cutting to the chase (from the PowerPoint slides accompanying the release):

Instead of adjusting the poorly sited station trends downward to the levels of the well located stations, the well sited station trends are adjusted upward to match the poor station trends. The “official” trend data is higher even than that of the raw data for non-compliant stations.

No result is too ridiculous as long as it helps The Cause, I guess.

Watts included a handy graph of the impact that can be used to beat warmists over the head (metaphorically of course).

Read the whole thing. Also, be sure to heed James Delingpole's advice and resist the urge to gloat.

Links & graphics at the source. Rude comments, too.

Yep, you have been conned, once again...

131 This is clearly racist. Libs never lie.

Posted by: The Churchill bust, currently residing in Barack Obama's fevered imagination
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 03/ 14/ 13 5:46 am

Golly!

http://www.grouchyconservativepundits.org/index.php?topic=56886.0

Second round of "Climategate" emails released.

There are 200K of them. No one has gone through and found any smoking guns yet. I think that's why "FOIA" released them, he hopes somebody will do the grunt work. I do too.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/13/climategate-3-0-has-occurred-the-password-has-been-released/#more-82057
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]

Postby backhoe » 03/ 15/ 13 6:45 pm

Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32498
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Previous

Return to Global Warming and Other Junk Sciences

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest