Sex exhibition aimed at teens in Ottawa museum

[GeronL]

Isn't kiddie porn supposed to be illegal in Canada??

Videos of masturbating children??

What kind of freaks are running Canada?

[GeronL]

Children are not forced to view this. With every field trip comes a permission slip.................DON'T SIGN IT. There, problem solved.

Are you sure about that??

The problem is that taxpayers are paying for it, condoning it and its somehow okay to do this to children at all, ever.

Videos of masturbating children isn't illegal?? Is that something you want to see or pay for??

[GeronL]

One good thing about this exhibit is that no one is forcing another person to go. I for one, wish I lived closer so I could take my teenaged (16 and over) grandchildren to see it.

So you support child molesting with your taxdollars??

Just have sex with your kids and grandkids and get it over with.


Perverts everywhere

[Brown envelope]

Children are not forced to view this. With every field trip comes a permission slip.................DON'T SIGN IT. There, problem solved.

Are you sure about that??

The problem is that taxpayers are paying for it, condoning it and its somehow okay to do this to children at all, ever.

Videos of masturbating children isn't illegal?? Is that something you want to see or pay for??

Yup. I'm surprised that nobody complained in Regina when the exhibit when there, but not surprised in the slightest that everyone in the socialist sesspool of Paybec loved it.

[Connie Fournier]

And you would have them represent scientific issues as ones that are dictated by Christian morality. Have you read the Song of Solomon? That's got more sexual content in it than 18 of these exhibits.

Stupidest comment ever. Saying that Song of Solomon has more sexual content than an exhibit that has masturbation videos? (Or 18 exhibits?)

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

[FiscalConservative]

And you would have them represent scientific issues as ones that are dictated by Christian morality. Have you read the Song of Solomon? That's got more sexual content in it than 18 of these exhibits.

Stupidest comment ever. Saying that Song of Solomon has more sexual content than an exhibit that has masturbation videos? (Or 18 exhibits?)

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Ok, so how do you interpret this?

O that thou wert as my brother, that sucked the breasts of my mother! when I should find thee without, I would kiss thee; yea, I should not be despised.

We have a little sister, and she hath no breasts: what shall we do for our sister in the day when she shall be spoken for?

My beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door, and my bowels were moved for him.

[Julian]

Are the taxpayers subsidizing this and graphically presenting to the youth of the nation?

[Edward Kennedy]

And you would have them represent scientific issues as ones that are dictated by Christian morality. Have you read the Song of Solomon? That's got more sexual content in it than 18 of these exhibits.

Stupidest comment ever. Saying that Song of Solomon has more sexual content than an exhibit that has masturbation videos? (Or 18 exhibits?)

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Ok, so how do you interpret this?

O that thou wert as my brother, that sucked the breasts of my mother! when I should find thee without, I would kiss thee; yea, I should not be despised.

We have a little sister, and she hath no breasts: what shall we do for our sister in the day when she shall be spoken for?

My beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door, and my bowels were moved for him.

You know as much about hermeneutics as you do about modesty...nada.

[FiscalConservative]

And you would have them represent scientific issues as ones that are dictated by Christian morality. Have you read the Song of Solomon? That's got more sexual content in it than 18 of these exhibits.

Stupidest comment ever. Saying that Song of Solomon has more sexual content than an exhibit that has masturbation videos? (Or 18 exhibits?)

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Ok, so how do you interpret this?

O that thou wert as my brother, that sucked the breasts of my mother! when I should find thee without, I would kiss thee; yea, I should not be despised.

We have a little sister, and she hath no breasts: what shall we do for our sister in the day when she shall be spoken for?

My beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door, and my bowels were moved for him.

You know as much about hermeneutics as you do about modesty...nada.

This is what I mean by cowardly, and let me explain, because it's not actually cowardly, it's more passive aggressive. I have chosen the wrong words to express myself.

So rather than argue the points made, you simply make a statement saying "yeah, I could refute that argument, but it's not worth my time." This is pretty much the definition of passive aggressive, as in trolling someone into a fight, rather than arguing the argument itself.

Instead of labeling my ignorance, demonstrate it. Please, if you feel I am in error dispute my statements.

I honestly hold that teaching children about sex and sexuality is a good thing. Children growing up without explanations for their urges is a bad thing and this exhibition helps kids understand why they feel the way they do.

Turning a blind eye to a child's sexuality is a bad thing and having an exhibit like this can help generate a dialog between parents and children.

I just don't understand how more information can be harmful. Withholding information is always harmful in the long run.

[virgey]

And you would have them represent scientific issues as ones that are dictated by Christian morality. Have you read the Song of Solomon? That's got more sexual content in it than 18 of these exhibits.

Stupidest comment ever. Saying that Song of Solomon has more sexual content than an exhibit that has masturbation videos? (Or 18 exhibits?)

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Ok, so how do you interpret this?

O that thou wert as my brother, that sucked the breasts of my mother! when I should find thee without, I would kiss thee; yea, I should not be despised.

We have a little sister, and she hath no breasts: what shall we do for our sister in the day when she shall be spoken for?

My beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door, and my bowels were moved for him.

You know as much about hermeneutics as you do about modesty...nada.

This is what I mean by cowardly, and let me explain, because it's not actually cowardly, it's more passive aggressive. I have chosen the wrong words to express myself.

So rather than argue the points made, you simply make a statement saying "yeah, I could refute that argument, but it's not worth my time." This is pretty much the definition of passive aggressive, as in trolling someone into a fight, rather than arguing the argument itself.

Instead of labeling my ignorance, demonstrate it. Please, if you feel I am in error dispute my statements.

I honestly hold that teaching children about sex and sexuality is a good thing. Children growing up without explanations for their urges is a bad thing and this exhibition helps kids understand why they feel the way they do.

Turning a blind eye to a child's sexuality is a bad thing and having an exhibit like this can help generate a dialog between parents and children.

I just don't understand how more information can be harmful. Withholding information is always harmful in the long run.

What you fail to realize is that this sex exhibit is not appropriate for 12 year old children in the way it was presented. The teaching of sexual matters is not the responsibility of the state or schools. It is the responsibility, and right of only the parents. This exhibit is too graphic besides being counter to many parents beliefs, and wishes. This exhibit pushes an agenda that is not healthy, and wrongly assumes they can highjack the parents responsibility to educate their children in non academic matters.

[drummer]

What you fail to realize is that this sex exhibit is not appropriate for 12 year old children in the way it was presented. The teaching of sexual matters is not the responsibility of the state or schools. It is the responsibility, and right of only the parents. This exhibit is too graphic besides being counter to many parents beliefs, and wishes. This exhibit pushes an agenda that is not healthy, and wrongly assumes they can highjack the parents responsibility to educate their children in non academic matters.

From what I heard on the news, the attendance age for this exhibit was raised to 16, which is quite appropriate. Anyone who thinks a 16-year old has not found about or does not engage in some of these sexual activities, is delusional. A 16-year old should have all the necessary information to deal with issues related to sex. It becomes the responsibility of the states because parents are often not the best teachers for this subject and they are not comfortable discussing it with their teenagers or only provide selective information. Parents have no right hiding these discussions from the children. There is nothing healthier and more important than teaching our children to understand the issues and dangers of sex in today's highly sexualized environment and media.

[drummer]

So you support child molesting with your taxdollars??

Just have sex with your kids and grandkids and get it over with.

Perverts everywhere

You seem to be the only pervert around here. fantasizing about sex with your kids and grandkids! The law should have allowed castrating pedophiles like you.

[mindyrbusiness]

They're mainstreaming pedophilia and judging by some of the commentary here many are ok with that.
The only reason the age was raised to age 16 was public outcry.
Michael Coren had a guest who visited this exhibit and said it was disgusting.
Michael also pointed out how sad it is many military history museums are facing extinction due to lack of funding.


Presuming one has read the Song of Solomon then one should know of the book of Ecclesiastes Ch.1: v2"Vanity of vanities! saith the Preacher,Vanity of vanities! all is vanity!"i.e., all man's efforts to find happiness apart from God are without result.
The Confession of King Solomon. “The writer is a man who has sinned in giving way to selfishness and sensuality, who has paid the penalty of that sin in satiety and weariness of life, but who has through all this been under the discipline of a divine education, and has learned from it the lesson which God meant to teach him.” "The writer concludes by pointing out that the secret of a true life is that a man should consecrate the vigour of his youth to God." The key-note of the book is sounded in ch. 1:2,(Web-Bible Network)

[drummer]

pedophilerapeenablers.jpg

They're mainstreaming pedophilia and judging by some of the commentary here many are ok with that.

As a matter of fact, those who oppose sex education for teenagers are contributing more to spread of pedophilia and child rape. A teenager who is well informed about sex, is far more able to protect herself/himself from potential abuse by older people who may have emotional control over him. I daresay there were more pedophilia and child abuse a generation ago where such discussions were far less common and abused kids didn't even know what was happening to them or where to get help or were too ashamed to even discuss it.

[WestViking]

What you fail to realize is that this sex exhibit is not appropriate for 12 year old children in the way it was presented. The teaching of sexual matters is not the responsibility of the state or schools. It is the responsibility, and right of only the parents. This exhibit is too graphic besides being counter to many parents beliefs, and wishes. This exhibit pushes an agenda that is not healthy, and wrongly assumes they can highjack the parents responsibility to educate their children in non academic matters.

Sex: A Tell-all Exhibition is an elaborate con game in which a number of people with questionable credentials and no authority have created a sex exhibition aimed at instilling a particular mind-set respecting human sexual activity in impressionable children and are daring society to stop them.

The concept underlying this exhibit is that the creators can do a superior job of sex education. They have no mandate to undertake avant-garde sex education. The sex exhibit does not fall within the mandate of the Canada Science and Technology Museum; rather than acquainting us with science and technology that have shaped society, the CSTM is promoting an exhibit designed to shape society. The CSTM has moved from educating us into experiments in influencing society at its most basic level. Visitors to the exhibit are unpaid guinea pigs and there is no ethical scientific control over the experiment being conducted.

The Canada Science and Technology Museum is a federal facility and education is a provincial responsibility. Parental rights to supervise the moral education of their children are ignored.

This is a colossal send-up and we appear to lack the spine to insist these charlatans be thrown out on the street and pelted with rotten fruit which is far less than they deserve.